UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934

(Amendment No.    )

Filed by the Registrant    ¨

Filed by a Party other than the Registrant    ¨

Check the appropriate box:

 

¨   Preliminary Proxy Statement

 

¨       Confidential,for Use of the Commission Only

(as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))

x   Definitive Proxy Statement

 

¨   Definitive Additional Materials

 

¨   Soliciting Material Pursuant to § 240.14a-12

 

SVB FINANCIAL GROUP

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement if Other Than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

x

No fee required.

¨

Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.

1)

Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:

2)

Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:

3)Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (Set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):

4)

Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

5)

Total fee paid:

¨

Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.

¨Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.

1)

Amount Previously Paid:

2)

Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

3)

Filing Party:

4)

Date Filed:


LOGO

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

Thursday, April 21, 2016

4:30 P.M.

TO THE STOCKHOLDERS:

I am pleased to invite you to attend the 2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of SVB Financial Group, a Delaware corporation, which will be held at our offices located at 3005 Tasman Drive, Santa Clara, California 95054, on Thursday, April 21, 2016 at 4:30 p.m., Pacific Time. The purposes of the meeting are to:

1.

Elect eleven (11) directors to serve for the ensuing year and until their successors are elected;

2.

Approve an amendment to the Company’s 1999 Employee Stock Purchase Plan to reserve an additional 1,500,000 shares of common stock for issuance thereunder;

3.

Ratify the appointment of KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for our fiscal year ending December 31, 2016;

4.

Approve, on an advisory basis, our executive compensation (“Say on Pay”); and

5.

Transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting.

The foregoing items of business are more fully described in the Proxy Statement accompanying this Notice. To assure your representation at the meeting, you are encouraged to vote your shares as soon as possible. Voting instructions are included in: (i) for those stockholders receiving printed proxy materials, the enclosed Proxy Card, and (ii) for all other stockholders, the Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials (as further described in the Proxy Statement). Any stockholder attending the meeting may vote in person even if such stockholder has previously voted by proxy.

Only stockholders of record at the close of business on February 23, 2016 may vote at the meeting or any postponement or adjournment thereof.

BY ORDER OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS,
/s/ Roger F. Dunbar
Roger F. Dunbar
Chairman of the Board

Santa Clara, California

March 3, 2016

YOU ARE CORDIALLY INVITED TO ATTEND THE MEETING IN PERSON. WHETHER OR NOT YOU EXPECT TO ATTEND THE MEETING, PLEASE COMPLETE, DATE, SIGN AND RETURN THE ENCLOSED PROXY CARD, OR VOTE OVER THE TELEPHONE OR THE INTERNET AS PROMPTLY AS POSSIBLE, IN ORDER TO ENSURE YOUR REPRESENTATION AT THE MEETING. IF YOU HAVE RECEIVED PRINTED PROXY MATERIALS, A RETURN ENVELOPE (WHICH IS POSTAGE PREPAID IF MAILED IN THE UNITED STATES) IS ENCLOSED FOR YOUR CONVENIENCE. EVEN IF YOU HAVE VOTED BY PROXY, YOU MAY STILL VOTE IN PERSON IF YOU ATTEND THE MEETING. WE ENCOURAGE YOU TO VOTE: (I) FOR THE ELECTION OF ALL ELEVEN (11) NOMINEES FOR DIRECTOR AND (II) IN FAVOR OF THE ABOVE REMAINING PROPOSALS.


PROXY STATEMENT—TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page

SUMMARY INFORMATION

PROXY STATEMENT GENERAL INFORMATION

BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

¡Proposal No. 1 – Election of Directors

2

Corporate Governance Principles and Board Matters

13

Board Committees

16

Audit Committee Report

18

Compensation Committee Report

19

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

19

Compensation for Directors

20

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions

22

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

23

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND COMPENSATION

Information on Executive Officers

24

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

29

Compensation for Named Executive Officers

45

SECURITY OWNERSHIP INFORMATION

Security Ownership of Directors and Executive Officers

54

Security Ownership of Principal Stockholders

55

OTHER PROXY PROPOSALS

¡Proposal No. 2 – Approval of Amendment to the 1999 Employee Stock Purchase Plan

56

¡Proposal No. 3 – Ratification of Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

61

Principal Audit Fees and Services

61

¡Proposal No. 4 – Advisory Approval of our Executive Compensation

62

MEETING AND OTHER INFORMATION

Information About Voting and Proxy Solicitation

63

Stockholder Proposals and Director Nominations

66

Copy of Bylaw Provisions

67

2015 Annual Report

67

Other Matters

67

APPENDIX A – Reconciliation of GAAP

A-1

APPENDIX B – 1999 Employee Stock Purchase Plan

B-1

¡

Indicates matters to be voted on at the Annual Meeting.

i


SUMMARY PERFORMANCE AND PROXY INFORMATION

This summary highlights our 2015 performance, as well as information contained elsewhere in this Proxy Statement. This summary does not contain all of the information that you should consider, and you should review this entire Proxy Statement, as well as our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year 2015.

2015 PERFORMANCE

2015 FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE (COMPAREDTO 2014)

GROWTH

ASSETS. All-time high of $40.8 billion in average total assets (up 24%).

LOANS. All-time high of $14.8 billion in average total loan balances, net of unearned income (up 28%).

DEPOSITS. All-time high of $36.3 billion in average total deposit balances (up 28%).

CLIENT INVESTMENT FUNDS. All-time high of $39.2 billion in average total client investment fund balances (off-balance sheet) (up 31%).

PROFITABILITY

EPS. Earnings per diluted share (“EPS”) of $6.62 (up 25%).

NETINCOME. All-time high consolidated net income available to common stockholders of $343.9 million (up 30%).

      Net interest income of $1.0 billion (up 18%).

      Noninterest income of $472.8 million, with non-GAAP core fee income (fee income for deposit services, letters of credit, business credit card, client investment, foreign exchange and lending-related activities) of $265.4 million+ (up 27%).

FOCUS ON RETURNS

ROE. Return on average equity (annualized) (“ROE”) performance of 11.18%.

TSR. Total Stockholder Return ranked in sixth position against peer group of 17 financial institutions. See “Compensation Discussion & Analysis – CompetitiveBenchmarking Against Peers” and “– Elements of 2015 Compensation – Long-term Equity Incentives.”

DISCIPLINE

CREDIT QUALITY. Disciplined credit underwriting, with net charge-offs of 0.31% of average total gross loans.

CAPITAL/LIQUIDITY. Continued strong capital and liquidity levels, including “well-capitalized” capital ratios pursuant to applicable regulatory requirements.

+ This is a non-GAAP financial metric. See Appendix A for reconciliation.

LOGO

LOGO

ii

LOGO     SUMMARY INFORMATION


2015 BUSINESS PERFORMANCE

2015 marked another year of robust business growth. We continued to focus on building deep relationships with fast growth, innovation companies and their investors, and continued to leverage our platform and expertise to grow our market leadership. Key 2015 business highlights, compared to 2014, include:

MARKET SHARE GROWTH
¡Our net client count increased by 18%.
¡Approximately 47% of the “innovation economy” companies1 that completed initial public offerings in 2015 were our clients.
¡We increased our Private Bank client base by approximately 25%.

CONTINUED FOCUSONOUR GLOBAL GROWTH
¡Our international client count grew by approximately 33%.
¡Our UK branch continued to grow, increasing period-end loans by 48% year over year.
¡Our China joint venture bank reached an important milestone of obtaining a license to do business in the local renminbi currency.

PAYMENTS BUSINESS GROWTH
¡Our credit card revenues increased by 36%.
¡We continued making meaningful progress in our strategy for providing banking infrastructure services to our fintech and payment clients.
¡The number of U.S. domestic payment transactions processed through our direct transmission solution, SVB Transact Gateway, reflected an increase of approximately 300%.

EXPANSIONOF DIGITALAND MOBILE DELIVERY CAPABILITIES
¡We expanded our client onboarding process by employing a digital solution, which we used to open most of our new client accounts in 2015.
¡Usage of our mobile banking app increased by over 50% among our clients.

For more information, please see our 2015 Year In Review Letter to Our Stockholders.

SVB BOARDOF DIRECTORS

LOGO

From left to right: David Clapper, Greg Becker, Lata Krishnan, Joel Friedman, Kate Mitchell, Eric Benhamou, Garen Staglin, John Robinson, Mary Miller, Roger Dunbar, Jeff Maggioncalda, and C. Richard Kramlich.(Mr. Kramlich transitioned into an advisory director role as of January 1, 2016.)

1 “Innovation economy” companies mean those in the hardware, software, life science, and energy and resource innovation industries.

iii

LOGO     SUMMARY INFORMATION


ANNUAL MEETINGAND PROXY STATEMENT INFORMATION

ANNUAL MEETING

Time and Date:

4:30 p.m. (Pacific Time), April 21, 2016Record Date:February 23, 2016

Place:

SVB Financial Group – Corporate Headquarters

3005 Tasman Drive

Santa Clara, California 95054

Voting:Stockholders as of record date are entitled to vote

PROPOSALSAND VOTING RECOMMENDATIONS

Proposal

Board Recommendation

Page Reference

Proposal No. 1 - Election of Eleven (11) Directors

For all nominees2

Proposal No. 2 - Amendment to 1999 Employee Stock Purchase Plan

For56

Proposal No. 3 -Ratification of KPMG LLP as Auditors for 2016

For61

Proposal No. 4 - Advisory (Non-Binding) Vote on Executive Compensation

For62

DIRECTOR NOMINEES

We are seeking your vote FOR all of the director nominees below:

All incumbent director nominees received at

least 99% “FOR” votes in 2015

(except Ms. Miller who joined the Board in May 2015).

                    Board Committee Membership*
  Name  Age   

Year First

Elected By

Stockholders

   Principal Occupation  Independent  Audit  Compensation   Credit  Finance  Governance  Risk

  Greg W. Becker

   48     2011    President and Chief Executive Officer, SVB Financial Group and Silicon Valley Bank        

  Eric A. Benhamou

   60     2005    Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Benhamou Global Ventures, LLC l    X C X

  David M. Clapper

   64     2005    Chief Executive Officer, Minerva Surgical, Inc. l X  C   X

  Roger F. Dunbar

   70     2005    Board Chairman SVB Financial Group and Silicon Valley Bank; Retired, Former Global Vice Chairman, Ernst & Young, LLP l X   X X C

  Joel P. Friedman

   68     2005    Retired, Former President, Business Process Outsourcing, Accenture l    C X X

  Lata Krishnan

   55     2008    Chief Financial Officer, Shah Capital Partners l X   X   

  Jeffrey N. Maggioncalda

   47     2012    Former Chief Executive Officer, Financial Engines l  X X    

  Mary J. Miller

   60         Former Under Secretary for Domestic Finance, U.S. Department of Treasury l    X   

  Kate D. Mitchell

   57     2010    Co-Founder and Managing Director, Scale Venture Partners l X C    X

  John F. Robinson

   69     2011    Former Deputy Comptroller of the Currency and former Executive Vice President, Washington Mutual Bank l C X X   X

  Garen K. Staglin

   71     2012    Proprietor, Staglin Family Vineyard l   X     X  

  * “C” denotes committee chairperson; all memberships are as of the date of this Proxy Statement.

iv

LOGO     SUMMARY INFORMATION


CORPORATE GOVERNANCE HIGHLIGHTS

BOARD COMPOSITION

ü All independent directors, except for CEO director

ü Separate Board Chairperson and CEO roles

ü Independent Board Chairperson

ü Independent chairpersons and members of all Board committees

ü Seasoned Board with diverse experience

ü No director serves on more than two public company boards, other than the Company

ü Balanced Board tenure:

BOARD ACCOUNTABILITY

ü Annual election of directors

ü Majority voting standard in uncontested director
elections

ü Annual Board (as a whole and by individual) and
committee evaluations

ü Regularly-held executive sessions of non-
management directors

ü Robust executive and director equity ownership
guidelines

ü Independent Board approval of CEO compensation

     Years of Service               <5            5-9             10+
Number of directors 3               4               4

STOCKHOLDER INTERESTS

ü Active stockholder engagement practices

ü Annual Say on Pay vote

ü Stockholders may call special meetings

ü One single voting class --- common stock class

ü No poison pill

RISK OVERSIGHT

ü Board (and individual committee) oversight of risk

ü Separate Board Risk Committee focused on enterprise wide risk management

ü Risk Committee comprised of the chairpersons of the Board and all six Board committees

AUDITOR MATTERS

As a matter of good corporate practice, we are seeking your ratification of KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the 2016 fiscal year.

For 2015, 91% of total 2015 fees represented audit and audit-related fees. (For more information, see page 61.)

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Consistent with our Board’s recommendation and our stockholders’ preference, we submit an advisory vote to approve our executive compensation (otherwise known as “Say on Pay”) on an annual basis. Accordingly, we are seeking your approval, on an advisory basis, of the compensation of our Named Executive Officers, as further described in the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section of this Proxy Statement.

For a summary of the highlights of our 2015 executive compensation and key features of our executive compensation programs, please refer to the Executive Summary of the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section of this Proxy Statement on page 29.

IMPORTANT DATESFOR 2017 ANNUAL MEETING

Stockholder proposals for inclusion in our 2016 proxy statement pursuant to SEC Rule 14a-8 must be received by us by November 12, 2016. Notice of stockholder proposals for the 2016 annual meeting outside of SEC Rule 14a-8 must be received by us no earlier than December 26, 2016 and no later than January 25, 2017.

* * * *

v

LOGO     SUMMARY INFORMATION


Mailed to Stockholders on or about March 10, 2016

PROXY STATEMENT

OF

SVB FINANCIAL GROUP

3003

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement if Other Than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

No fee required.

Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.

1)

Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:

2)

Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:

3)Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (Set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):

4)

Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

5)

Total fee paid:

Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.

Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.

1)

Amount Previously Paid:

2)

Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

3)

Filing Party:

4)

Date Filed:


LOGO

NOTICE OF 2018 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

Thursday, April 26, 2018

4:30 P.M. (Pacific Time)

Dear Stockholders:

On behalf of the Board of Directors, I am pleased to invite you to attend the 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of SVB Financial Group, a Delaware corporation, which will be held at our offices located at 3005 Tasman Drive,

Santa Clara, California 95054, on Thursday, April 26, 2018 at 4:30 p.m., Pacific Time. The purposes of the meeting are to:

 

1.

Elect eleven (11) directors to serve for the ensuing year and until their successors are elected,

2.

Ratify the appointment of KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for our fiscal year ending December 31, 2018,

3.

Approve, on an advisory basis, our executive compensation (“Say on Pay”), and

4.

Transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting.

The foregoing items of business are more fully described in the Proxy Statement accompanying this Notice. To assure your representation at the meeting, you are encouraged to vote your shares as soon as possible. This Notice and the Proxy Statement provide instructions on how you can vote your shares online or by telephone, or if you have received a printed copy of the proxy materials and a proxy card, by mail. You may attend the meeting and vote in person even if you have previously voted by proxy.

Only stockholders of record at the close of business on February 26, 2018 may vote at the meeting or any postponement or adjournment thereof.

 

BY ORDER OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS,

/s/ Roger F. Dunbar
Roger F. Dunbar
Chairman of the Board

Santa Clara, California

March 8, 2018

YOU ARE CORDIALLY INVITED TO ATTEND THE ANNUAL MEETING IN PERSON. WHETHER OR NOT YOU EXPECT TO ATTEND THE MEETING, PLEASE COMPLETE, DATE, SIGN AND RETURN THE ENCLOSED PROXY CARD, OR VOTE OVER THE TELEPHONE OR THE INTERNET AS PROMPTLY AS POSSIBLE, IN ORDER TO ENSURE YOUR REPRESENTATION AT THE MEETING. IF YOU HAVE RECEIVED PRINTED PROXY MATERIALS, A RETURN ENVELOPE (WHICH IS POSTAGE PREPAID IF MAILED IN THE UNITED STATES) IS ENCLOSED FOR YOUR CONVENIENCE. EVEN IF YOU HAVE VOTED BY PROXY, YOU MAY STILL VOTE IN PERSON IF YOU ATTEND THE MEETING. WE ENCOURAGE YOU TO VOTE: (I) FOR THE ELECTION OF ALL ELEVEN (11) NOMINEES FOR DIRECTOR, AND (II) IN FAVOR OF THE ABOVE REMAINING PROPOSALS.


PROXY STATEMENT GENERAL INFORMATIONSTATEMENT—TABLE OF CONTENTS

General

Page

SUMMARY PERFORMANCE AND PROXY INFORMATION

PROXY STATEMENT INFORMATION ABOUT SVB FINANCIAL GROUP

BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Proposal No. 1 — Election of Directors

2

Corporate Governance and Board Matters

14

Board Committees

18

Audit Committee Report

20

Compensation Committee Report

21

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

21

Compensation for Directors

22

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions

24

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

25

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND COMPENSATION

Information on Executive Officers

26

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

29

Compensation for Named Executive Officers

45

CEO Pay Ratio

53

SECURITY OWNERSHIP INFORMATION

Security Ownership of Directors and Executive Officers

54

Security Ownership of Principal Stockholders

55

OTHER PROXY PROPOSALS

Proposal No. 2 — Ratification of Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

56

Principal Audit Fees and Services

56

Proposal No. 3 — Advisory Approval of our Executive Compensation

57

MEETING AND OTHER INFORMATION

Information About Voting and Proxy Solicitation

58

Stockholder Proposals and Director Nominations

61

Copy of Bylaw Provisions

62

2017 Annual Report

62

Other Matters

62

Indicates matters to be voted on at the Annual Meeting.

i


 SUMMARY PERFORMANCEAND PROXY INFORMATION

This summary highlights our 2017 performance, as well as information contained elsewhere in this Proxy Statement. This summary does not contain all of the information that you should consider, and you should review this entire Proxy Statement, as well as our Annual Report on Form10-K, for the year ended December 31, 2017.

2017 PERFORMANCE

2017 Financial Performance Highlights

We achieved another year of record diluted earnings per share (“EPS”) and net income, and we maintained multi-year growth of our average total assets, loans (net of unearned income), and client funds (deposits and client investment funds). Our stock price has also generally performed well, as illustrated in the graph below.

LOGO

LOGO

2017 Business Performance Highlights

2017 reflected another year of healthy business growth, as we continued to serve the innovation economy. We continued to focus on our clients, our global growth, and in particular, growing our “core fee income” business. Select 2017 highlights include:

Market Share Growth

¡We grew our total net count of core commercial clients by 15%.
¡We grew our net client count in key client segments, including early-stage clients (by 15%), Private Bank (by 25%), and private equity clients (by 17%).

Expanding our Global Reach

¡We continued to make significant progress establishing lending branches in Germany and Canada, both of which are subject to regulatory approval.
¡Our EMEA client count increased by 30%.

Continued Focus on our Core Fee Income Business

¡Our foreign exchange transaction volume increased by over 30%, compared to 2016, hitting anall-time quarterly high of $34 million in revenues.
¡We surpassed $4.5 billion in annual credit card transactions for our clients in 2017, a 31% increase compared to 2016.
¡We achieved a year-over-year increase of 74% in client investment fees.

ii

LOGOSUMMARY INFORMATION


ANNUAL MEETINGAND PROXY STATEMENT INFORMATION

Annual Meeting

Time and Date:4:30 p.m. (Pacific Time), April 26, 2018Record Date:February 26, 2018
Place:

SVB Financial Group—Corporate Headquarters

3005 Tasman Drive, Santa Clara, California 95054

Voting:Stockholders as of the record date are entitled to vote

Proposals and Voting Recommendations

Proposal

Board Recommendation

Page Reference

Proposal No. 1 — Election of Eleven (11) Directors

For all nominees2

Proposal No. 2 — Ratification of KPMG LLP as Auditors for 2018

For56

Proposal No. 3 — Advisory(Non-Binding) Vote on Executive Compensation

For57

Director Nominees

We are seeking your election of the eleven (11) directors described below—ten of which are current incumbent directors. Ms. Kimberly A. Jabal is a new director nominee who will join the Board, subject to stockholder election. Mr. David M. Clapper and Ms. Lata Krishnan, both current directors, will not be standing forre-election and will be retiring from the Board at the Annual Meeting.

                   Committee Membership*
Name  Age   Year First
Elected By
Stockholders
  Principal Occupation 

  #  of  Other  Public

  Company  Boards 

  Audit  Compensation  Credit  Finance  Governance  Risk
  

Greg W. Becker

 

   

 

50

 

 

 

  2011

 

  

President and Chief Executive Officer, SVB Financial Group

 

 

 

       
  

Eric A. Benhamou

 

   

 

62

 

 

 

  2005

 

  

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Benhamou Global Ventures, LLC

 

 1

 

    X

 

 C

 

 X

 

 

John S. Clendening

 

  

 

 

 

 

55

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

President and CEO, Blucora, Inc.

 

 

 

1

 

   

 

X

 

    
  

Roger F. Dunbar

 

   

 

72

 

 

 

  2005

 

  

Board Chairman SVB Financial Group; Former Global Vice Chairman, Ernst & Young, LLP

 

 

 

 X

 

   X

 

 X

 

 C

 

  

Joel P. Friedman

 

   

 

70

 

 

 

  2005

 

  

Former President, Business Process Outsourcing, Accenture

 

 1

 

    C

 

 X

 

 X

 

 

Kimberly A. Jabal

 

  

 

 

 

 

49

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

Chief Financial Officer, Weebly, Inc.

 

 

 

1

 

       

 

Jeffrey N. Maggioncalda

 

  

 

 

 

 

49

 

 

 

 

  

 

2012

 

  

 

Chief Executive Officer, Coursera Inc.

 

 

 

 

  

 

X

 

 

 

X

 

    
  

Mary J. Miller

 

   

 

62

 

 

 

  2016

 

  

Former Under Secretary for Domestic Finance, U.S. Department of Treasury

 

 

 

 X

 

   X

 

   
  

Kate D. Mitchell

 

   

 

59

 

 

 

  2010

 

  

Co-Founder and Managing Director, Scale Venture Partners

 

 1

 

  C

 

 X

 

   X

 

  

John F. Robinson

 

   

 

71

 

 

 

  2011

 

  

Former Deputy Comptroller of the Currency and former Executive Vice President, Washington Mutual Bank

 

 1

 

 C

 

 X

 

 X

 

   X

 

 

Garen K. Staglin

 

  

 

 

 

 

73

 

 

 

 

  

 

2012

 

  

 

Proprietor, Staglin Family Vineyard

 

 

 

1

 

   

 

X

 

     

 

X

 

  

        * “C” denotes committee chairperson; all memberships are as of the date of this Proxy Statement.

iii

LOGOSUMMARY INFORMATION


Board and Corporate Governance Highlights

(Based on current Board profile and practices)

BOARD COMPOSITION

Total of 12 current directors — all independent directors, except for CEO director

Separate Board Chairperson and CEO roles

Independent Board Chairperson

Independent chairpersons and members of all Board committees

Seasoned Board with diverse experience, including innovation economy industries, banking/financial services, global, finance/accounting, risk oversight/management and Government/Regulatory

No director serves on more than one public company board, other than the Company

Policy requiring directors to submit their resignation upon reaching the age of 75

BOARD ACCOUNTABILITY

Annual election of directors

Effective majority voting standard in uncontested director elections (through director resignation policy)

Annual Board and committee evaluations

Regularly-held executive sessions ofnon-management directors

Robust executive and director equity ownership guidelines

Independent Board evaluation of CEO performance

Independent Board approval of CEO compensation

Ongoing director nominee identification and selection process

Limit on director compensation under equity plan

LOGO

DIRECTOR QUALIFICATIONS

Our directors reflect an effective and diverse mix of skills and experience:

LOGO

  STOCKHOLDER INTERESTS

All independent directors, except for CEO director

Separate Board Chairperson and CEO roles

Active stockholder engagement practices

Annual Say on Pay vote

Stockholders may act by written consent

One single voting class — common stock class

No poison pill

  RISK MANAGEMENT

Board and individual committee oversight of risk

Separate Board Risk Committee focused on enterprise-wide risk management framework

Risk Committee comprised of the chairpersons of the Board and all six Board committees

Risk management guided by Risk Appetite Statement (reviewed on an annual basis by the full Board)

iv

LOGOSUMMARY INFORMATION


Auditor Matters

As a matter of good corporate practice, we are seeking your ratification of KPMG LLP (“KPMG”) as our independent registered public accounting firm for the 2018 fiscal year. If our stockholders do not ratify the selection of KPMG, the Audit Committee may reconsider its selection.

For 2017, the total fees for services provided by KPMG were $8,115,998, of which 80.8% represented audit and audit-related fees. (For more information, see page 56.)

Executive Compensation

Consistent with our Board’s recommendation and our stockholders’ preference, we submit an advisory vote to approve our executive compensation (otherwise known as “Say on Pay”) on an annual basis. Accordingly, we are seeking your approval, on an advisory basis, of the compensation of our Named Executive Officers, as further described in the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section of this Proxy Statement.

2017 Named Executive Officers (“NEOs”)

In addition to applicable SEC requirements, the six NEOs for 2017 reflect key areas of Company focus, including our banking business, operational infrastructure, and risk management, as well as financial performance. Their 2017 compensation reflects their individual performance and contributions to the Company’s performance, as well as their leadership and increased span of responsibilities in their respective areas.

“CD&A” Executive Summary

2017 NEOs

GREG BECKER,President and
Chief Executive Officer

DAN BECK,Chief Financial Officer

MICHAEL DESCHENEAUX,President, Silicon
Valley Bank (former Chief Financial Officer)

JOHN CHINA,Head of Technology Banking

MICHAEL DREYER,Chief Operations Officer

LAURA IZURIETA,Chief Risk Officer

For a summary of the highlights of our 2017 executive compensation and key features of our executive compensation governance and practices, please refer to the Executive Summary of the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section of this Proxy Statement on page 29.

Important Dates for 2019 Annual Meeting

Stockholder proposals for inclusion in our 2019 proxy statement pursuant to SEC Rule14a-8 must be received by us by November 8, 2018. Notice of stockholder proposals for the 2019 annual meeting outside of SEC Rule14a-8 must be received by us no earlier than December 23, 2018 and no later than January 22, 2019.

* * * *

v

LOGOSUMMARY INFORMATION


  PROXY STATEMENT INFORMATIONOF SVB FINANCIAL GROUP

GENERAL INFORMATION

This Proxy Statement is furnished in connection with the solicitation of proxies by, and on behalf of, the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of SVB Financial Group (the “Company”) for useto be voted at our 20162018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders toand any adjournments or postponements of that meeting (the “Annual Meeting”). The Annual Meeting will be held at our offices located at 3005 Tasman Drive, Santa Clara, California 95054, on Thursday, April 21, 201626, 2018 at 4:30 p.m., Pacific Time, and at all postponements or adjournments thereof (the “Meeting”). (ForTime. For directions to attend the Annual Meeting in person, please contact usvisit our website athttp://www.svb.com/locations.aspx.The proxies may also be voted at any adjournments or postponements of the meeting.

All properly executed written proxies and all properly completed proxies submitted by telephone or internet that are delivered pursuant to this solicitation will be voted at the telephone number below.)

Record Date

Only stockholdersAnnual Meeting in accordance with the directions given in the proxy, unless the proxy is revoked prior to completion of record on February 23, 2016 (the “Record Date”) will be entitled to votevoting at the Meeting. Atmeeting.

We are first furnishing the close of businessproxy materials to stockholders on the Record Date, there were 51,629,096 shares of our common stock, $0.001 par value (the “Common Stock”), outstanding.or about March 8, 2018.

Principal Executive OfficesPRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICES

The Company is a Delaware corporation and financial holding company for Silicon Valley Bank (the “Bank”) and its affiliates. Our principal executive offices are located at 3003 Tasman Drive, Santa Clara, California 95054, and our telephone number at that location is(408) 654-7400.

Important Notice RegardingRECORD DATE

Only stockholders of record as of the Availabilityclose of Proxy Materials forbusiness on February 26, 2018 (the “Record Date”) will be entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the Annual Meeting or any adjournments or postponements of the meeting. At the close of business on the Record Date, there were 52,889,741 shares of our common stock, $0.001 par value (“Common Stock”), outstanding.

IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDINGTHE AVAILABILITYOF PROXY MATERIALSFORTHE ANNUAL MEETING

This Proxy Statement and our 2015 Annual Report on Form10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017 are available electronically atwww.svb.com/proxyproxy.. (The The contents of our website are not incorporated herein by reference and any reference to our website address provided throughout this Proxy Statement is intended to be an inactive textual reference only. See also “Information about Voting and Proxy Solicitation—Delivery of Proxy Materials”below.The contents of the website are not incorporated herein by reference and the website address provided above and throughout this Proxy Statement is intended to be an inactive textual reference only.) See also “Information About Voting and Proxy Solicitation – Delivery of Proxy Materials” below.

ABOUT THE COMPANY…

For 35 years, SVB Financial Group and its subsidiaries have helped innovative companies and their investors move bold ideas forward, fast. SVB Financial Group’s businesses, including Silicon Valley Bank, offer commercial and private banking, asset management, private wealth management and investment services, and funds management to companies in the technology, life science and healthcare, private equity and venture capital, and premium wine industries. Headquartered in Santa Clara, California, SVB Financial Group operates in centers of innovation around the world.

 

1

LOGOPROXY STATEMENT INFORMATION

LOGO     PROXY STATEMENT INFORMATION


  BOARDOF DIRECTORSAND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Proposal No. 1 – Election of Directors

ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

The Board of Directors Recommends a Vote “For”FOR All Nominees

DIRECTOR ELECTION, QUALIFICATIONAND OTHER INFORMATION

Our amended and restated bylaws (the “BylawsDirectors”) require

Upon the Boardrecommendation of Directorsthe Governance Committee, we are pleased to consist of at least eight (8), but no more than thirteen (13) members, with the exact number to be fixed by the Board of Directors. The number of directors authorized by the Board is currently fixed atpropose eleven (11).

Our Board of Directors has nominated eleven (11) directors — ten (10) independent directors and the CEO — director nominees for election at this year’s Meeting to hold office until the next annual meeting. All of our incumbent directors are nominees for re-election to the Board and were recommended by the Governance Committee. All of the nominees, with the exception of Ms. Miller (who joined the Board in May 2015), served as directors of the Company since the last annual meeting of stockholders in April 2015, each of whom received the support of more than 99% of the votes cast at the 2015 Annual Meeting.

year. We believe that our director nominees, individually and together as a whole, possess the requisite skills, experience and qualifications necessary to createmaintain an effective Board to serve the best interests of the Company and its stockholders. All nominees are deemed independent, except for our CEO.

During this most recent director term, we welcomed Mr. John Clendening, who joined our Board in August 2017. Additionally, the Board has nominated a new director, Ms. Kimberly Jabal, for election at the Annual Meeting. We believe that both Mr. Clendening and Ms. Jabal will bring additional diversity of experience and expertise, as further outlined in their biographies below, that will enhance the overall effectiveness of our Board. We also thank Ms. Krishnan and Mr. Clapper who will not be standing forre-election and will be retiring from our Board at the Annual Meeting. We are grateful for their many years of dedicated service on the Board and contributions to the Company.

Our directors are elected on an annual basis to hold office for aone-year term expiring at the 2019 Annual Meeting. Each director will hold office until his or her successor has been elected and qualified or until the director’s earlier death, resignation or removal.

Director Qualifications

The Board recognizes that it is of utmost importance to assemble a body of directors that, taken together, has the skills, qualifications, experience and attributes appropriate for functioning as a board and working productively with management. The Governance Committee of the Board is responsible for maintaining a well-rounded and diverse board that has the requisite diversity of skills and qualifications to oversee the Company effectively. The Governance Committee has not formally established any minimum qualifications for director candidates. However, in light of our business, the primary areas of experience, qualifications and attributes typically sought by the Governance Committee in director candidates include,but are not limited to, the following primary areas:

 

Director Qualifications

The Board recognizes that it is of utmost importance to assemble a body of directors that, taken together, has the skills, qualifications, experience and attributes appropriate for functioning as a board, and working with management, effectively. The Governance Committee of the Board is responsible for maintaining a well-rounded and diverse board that has the requisite diversity of skills and qualifications to oversee the Company effectively. The Governance Committee has not formally established any minimum qualifications for director candidates. However, in light of our business, the primary areas of experience, qualifications and attributes sought by the Governance Committee in director candidates include,but are not limited to, the primary areas identified on the right and below.

The Board believes that our incumbent directors, as a whole, have these areas of experience and each possesses particular attributes which qualify him or her to serve on the Board, as further noted in his or her respective biography below.(For each director, we have highlighted certain key areas of qualifications. The fact that an area is not highlighted does not mean that the director does not possess such qualification.)

LOGO    

PRIMARY AREAS OF DIRECTOR QUALIFICATIONS

•      Client Industry – Experience with our key client industries — technology, life science/healthcare, venture capital/private equity and premium wine — to help deepen our knowledge of the innovation markets we do business in.

•      Banking/Financial Services – Experience with the banking or financial services industry, including regulatory experience, to support and grow our core business.

•      Global – Experience working outside of the United States and/or with global companies, to help our global expansion.

•      Leadership - Experience from holding significant leadership positions, including as a CEO of a successful company or a head of a significant business, to help us drive business strategy, growth and performance.

LOGO  

Client Industry - Experience with our key client industries, including technology, life science and healthcare, private equity/venture capital and premium wine, to help deepen our knowledge of the innovation and other markets in which we do business.

LOGO  

Banking/Financial Services - Experience with the banking or financial services industry, to help support and grow our core business.

LOGO  

•      Global - Experience working outside of the United States or with multinational companies, to help facilitate our global expansion.

LOGO  

Finance/Accounting - Experience with finance, accounting and/or financial reporting processes, to help drive operating and financial performance.

LOGO  

•      Risk Oversight/Management - Experience with key risk oversight or risk management functions, to help oversee the dynamic risks we face.

LOGO  

•      Public CompanyGovernment/Regulatory - Experience working with publicly-traded companiesor in governmental and corporate governance issues.regulatory organizations to oversee our highly regulated business that is affected by governmental actions.

Other key attributes deemed important for directors to possess include:

 

KEY DIRECTOR ATTRIBUTES  Strong strategic sense

 

      Strong strategic and/or  Critical and innovative thinking

•      Integrity

      Collegial spirit

  Sound business judgment

 

 

  High ethical standards and integrity

  Collegial spirit

  Ability to debate constructively

 

  Professionalism

  Ability to generate public confidence

•      Ability to act independently

  Availability and commitment to serve

 

2

LOGO

BOARD & CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Proposal 1 — Election of Directors

LOGO     BOARD & CORPORATE GOVERNANCE


Nominees for DirectorDirector; Plurality Vote

All proxies will be voted “FOR”FOR the election of the following eleven (11) nominees, as recommended by the BoardGovernance Committee and approved for a term of one year,nomination for election by the Board, unless authority to vote for the election of directors (or for any particular nominee) is withheld. If any of the nominees should unexpectedly declinedeclines or bebecomes unable to act as a director, the proxies may be voted for a substitute nominee designated by the Board. As of the date of this Proxy Statement, the Board has no reason to believe that any nominee will become unavailable and has no present intention to nominate persons in addition to, or in lieu of, those listed below. Our directors serve until the next annual meeting of stockholders and until their successors are duly elected and qualified, or until their earlier death, resignation or removal.

Vote Required

Any nominee Pursuant to our Bylaws, directors are elected by a plurality of votes cast at the Annual Meeting. This means that the eleven (11) nominees who receives a greaterreceive the highest number of votes cast “for” his or her election than votes cast “withheld” his or hertheir election will be elected.

Majority VotingDirector Resignation Policy

The Governance Committee of our Board has adopted a majority votingdirector resignation policy applicable to uncontested director elections, (i.e.,such as the election to be held at the upcoming Annual Meeting, which effectively requires an uncontested nominee to receive a majority of votes cast in such election or offer to resign. Uncontested elections are elections where the number of nominees is not greater than the number of directors to be elected). Under thiselected. Pursuant to the director resignation policy, any of our director nominees in an uncontested election who receives a greater number of votes “withheld” from his or her election than votes “for” such election shall, promptly following certification of the stockholder vote, offeris required to tender his or her resignation to the Board for consideration.consideration promptly following certification of the stockholder vote. The Governance Committee will act within 90ninety (90) days after certification of the stockholder vote to determine whether to accept the director’s resignation, and thereafter submit such resignation and its recommendation to the Board for consideration at itsthe Board’s next scheduled meeting. The Board expects that theany director whose resignation is under consideration will abstain from participating in any decision or deliberation regarding that resignation. FollowingWe will disclose any decision made by the Board’s decision, we will publicly disclose the decision madeBoard with respect to any tendered resignation.

Director Biographies

The biographical information forSimilarly, upon reaching the age of 75, eachnon-executive director shall also tender his or her resignation, which shall also be subject to the acceptance of the director nominees is as follows:Governance Committee, in consultation with the Board.

3

LOGO

BOARD & CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Proposal 1 — Election of Directors


BIOGRAPHIESOF DIRECTOR NOMINEES

 

Greg W. Becker

Board Committees:Independent:
N/ANo

Mr. Becker, age 48, was appointed the President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company and the Bank in April 2011. He first joined us in 1993 as part of the Northern California Technology Division, and since then, has served in a number of executive and senior management positions, including Division Manager of Venture Capital (1999-2002), Chief Banking Officer (2002-2003), Chief Operating Officer (2003-2008) and President of Silicon Valley Bank (since 2008). Mr. Becker was elected by stockholders as a director of the Company in April 2011.

Private

Directorships:GREG W. BECKER

  DIRECTORSINCE 2011    LOGO

•   Chairman, Mr. Becker, age 50, was appointed the President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company in April 2011. He first joined us in 1993 as part of the Northern California Technology Division, and since then, has served in a number of executive and senior management roles, including Division Manager of Venture Capital(1999-2002), Chief Banking Officer (2002-2003), Chief Operating Officer (2003-2008) and President of the Bank (2008-2017).

  Committees: N/A

Independent: No

BUSINESS EXPERIENCE

CURRENT PRIVATE DIRECTORSHIPS:

-Silicon Valley Leadership Group, a non-profit organization with an emphasis on issues of importance to employers, employees and residents of Silicon Valley (since 2011)

(member since 2011; Chairman 2015-2017)

Prior

Directorships:

-
 

Executive Council, TechNet (since 2016)

-Advisory Council Member, Alliance for Southern California Innovation (since 2017)

PRIOR DIRECTORSHIPS:

-Director and executive committee member, Bay Area Council, a public policy advocacy organization (2011-2015) (as director and executive committee member)

OTHER PRIOR EXPERIENCE:

Other Prior

Experience:

-
 

•   Member, U.S. Department Digital Economy Board of Advisors (2016-2017)

-President, Board of Trustees, Silicon Valley and Monterey Bay Area Chapter of the Leukemia & Lymphoma Society(2004-2011)

EDUCATION:

Education:

-
 

•   Bachelor’s degree in Business from Indiana University

QUALIFICATIONS

 

 

Skills/LOGO

Qualifications:

 

In particular, Mr. Becker’s key areas of skills/qualifications include, but are not limited to:

•   Leadership — Based on his current roleposition as the Company’s CEO, as well as held other prior leadership roles within the Company

•   

LOGO

Client Industry andBanking/Financial Services – extensive— Extensive experience with the Company, and within the banking industry working with public and private technology, life science, and private equity/venture capital and premium wine clients

LOGO

Banking/Financial Services— Career-long experience within the banking industry

LOGO

Global— Extensive global experience through the Company’s international expansion efforts

 

34

LOGO

BOARD & CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Proposal 1 — Election of Directors

LOGO     BOARD & CORPORATE GOVERNANCE


EricERIC A. BenhamouBENHAMOU

DIRECTORSINCE 2005     BoardLOGO

Mr. Benhamou, age 62, is Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Benhamou Global Ventures, LLC (“Benhamou Global Ventures”), which he founded in 2003. Benhamou Global Ventures invests and plays an active role in innovative high-tech firms throughout the world. Mr. Benhamou also sits on various public and private technology company boards, and serves a variety of educational and philanthropic organizations.

  Committees: Governance (Chair), Finance and Risk

  Independent:
 Yes 

•     Governance,Chair

BUSINESS EXPERIENCE

CURRENT PUBLIC DIRECTORSHIPS:

•     Finance

•     Risk

- Yes

Mr. Benhamou, age 60, is Chairman and CEO of Benhamou Global Ventures, LLC, which he founded in 2003. Benhamou Global Ventures, LLC invests and plays an active role in innovative high tech firms throughout the world. He also sits on various public and private technology company boards, and serves a variety of educational and philanthropic organizations. Mr. Benhamou was appointed by the Board of Directors as a director of the Company in February 2005 and was first elected by stockholders in April 2005.

Public Directorships:

•  Chairman, Cypress Semiconductor, a semiconductor company (since 1993)

•  Finjan Corporation,Holdings, Inc., a global provider of proactive web security solutions (since 2006)

CURRENT PRIVATE DIRECTORSHIPS/OTHER EXPERIENCE:

Private Directorships:- 

•  Chairman, Totango, a customer success and data platform (since 2016)

-Chairman, Ayehu, a developer of IT process automation products (since 2015)

•  

-Grid Dynamics, a provider of commerce technology solutions for retailers (since 2015)

Other Experience:- 

•  Virtual Instruments, an infrastructure performance analytics company (since 2016)

-Chairman, of the Israel Venture Network, a venture philanthropyphilanthropic organization for a stronger Israeli society (since 2000)

PRIOR DIRECTORSHIPS:

Prior Directorships:- 

•  Chairman, Cypress Semiconductor Corporation, a semiconductor company (1993-2017)

-Qubell, ana private application deployment and configuration management platform (acquired by Grid Dynamics)(acquired) (2014-2015)

•  

-ConteXtream, a private carrier equipment vendor for intellectual property based media services (acquired by Hewlett Packard)(acquired) (2007-2015)

•  

-Load Dynamix (formerly SwiftTest, Inc.),DynamiX, a commercial IPprivate intellectual property network testing tool developer (2010-2014)

•  Purewave,

-PureWave Networks, Inc., a private developer of outdoor compact base stations for the 4G marketplace (2010-2014)

•  

-RealNetworks, Inc., a public company creator of digital media services and software (2003-2012)

•  Chairman, 3Com Corporation, a public networking solutions provider (1990-2010)

•  

-Voltaire Ltd., a public grid computing network solutions company (acquired by Mellanox Technologies, Ltd.) (2007-2011)

•  

-Dasient Inc., a private security company that provides malware detection and prevention solutions (acquired) (2010-2011)

•  

-Chairman, 3Com Corporation, a public networking solutions provider (acquired) (1990-2010)
-Chairman of the Board of Directors of Palm, Inc., a public mobile products provider (acquired) (1999-2007)

•  Other private directorships: Atrica, Go Networks, WisdomArk (various dates from 2000-2008)

OTHER PRIOR EXPERIENCE:

Other Prior Experience:- 

•  Executive committee member, Stanford University School of Engineering (1996-2015)

•  

-Visiting professor, IDC Business School (2001-2015)

•  

-Executive committee member, Ben Gurion University of Negev (2000-2013)

•  

-Visiting professor, INSEAD Business School (2003-2012)

•  

-Executive committee member, Computer Science & Telecommunications Board (CSTB) (2003-2008)
-Interim Chief Executive Officer of Palm, Inc. (2001-2003)

•  

-Chief Executive Officer, 3Com Corporation (1990-2000), and other various senior management positions

•  

-Executive committee member, Computer Science and Telecommunications Board (CSTB) (2003-2008)

•  TechNet (2005)

-Member, US-Israel Science and Technology Commission (2003)

•  Executive committee member, TechNet

•  

-Co-founder and Vice President of Engineering, Bridge Communications (1981-1987)

EDUCATION:

Education:- 

•  Engineering degree from l’École Nationale Supérieure d’Arts et Métiers in Paris, France

•  

-Master’s degree in Science from the School of Engineering at Stanford University

•  

-Several honorary doctorates

QUALIFICATIONS

 

Skills/ Qualifications:

LOGO

 

In particular, Mr. Benhamou’sLeadership — Held a variety of key areas of skills/qualifications include, but are not limited to:executive positions, including Chairman/CEO roles at 3Com Corporation and Palm, Inc.

 

•  LOGO

Client Industry – in-depth— In-depth experience with both public and private technology companies (asas part of management and/or as a director and venture capital investor);investor; current role as Chairman and CEOChief Executive Officer of Benhamou Global Ventures

•  

LOGO

Global – strategic— Strategic and operational experience in the global markets, particularly in Europe and Israel

•  Leadership – held a variety of key executive positions, including Chairman and CEO roles of 3Com Corporation and Palm, Inc.

 

45

LOGO

BOARD & CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Proposal 1 — Election of Directors

LOGO     BOARD & CORPORATE GOVERNANCE


David M. ClapperJOHN S. CLENDENING

Board Committees:Independent:

•     Credit,Chair

•     Audit

•     Risk

  DIRECTORSINCE 2017    LOGO

Mr. Clendening, age 55, is currently President and CEO of Blucora, Inc., a provider of multi-channel financial and tax preparation services. Mr. Clendening previously served in various executive management roles at The Charles Schwab Corporation (“Charles Schwab”) from 2004-2015, most recently as Executive Vice President and Co-Head, Retail Business.

  Committees: Credit

Independent: Yes

Mr. Clapper, age 64, has been the Chief Executive Officer of Minerva Surgical, a medical device company, since May 2011. He has had an extensive career in the healthcare and medical device industries, including serving as the President and Chief Executive Officer (2005-2008) of SurgRx, Inc., a privately held medical device manufacturer, until its acquisition by Ethicon Endo-Surgery in 2008, as well as a variety of public and private company directorships. Mr. Clapper was appointed by the Board of Directors as a director of the Company in October 2004 and was first elected by stockholders in April 2005.BUSINESS EXPERIENCE

CURRENT PUBLIC DIRECTORSHIPS:

-Blucora, Inc., a provider of multi-channel financial and tax preparation services (since 2016)

PRIOR DIRECTORSHIPS:

-Betterment Holdings, Inc., an online investment services company (2016-2017)

OTHER PRIOR EXPERIENCE:

-Executive Vice President, The Charles Schwab Corporation, a financial services and banking company (2004-2015)
-President and Founder, Restaurant Business Services, eMac Digital (2001-2004)
-Senior Vice President, Web, Marketing and Technology, Living.com (2000)
-Chief Marketing Officer and Senior Vice President, Consumer Banking Group, First Union Corporation (1998-2000)
-Various management positions at The Coca-Cola Company, Frito-Lay, SEARS Specialty Merchandising Group and Booz Allen & Hamilton, Inc.

EDUCATION:

-Bachelor’s degree in Economics from Northwestern University
-Master’s degree in Business Administration from Harvard University

QUALIFICATIONS

Public Directorships:

LOGO

 

•  Carbylan Therapeutics, a pharmaceutical company (since 2014)

Private Directorships:

•  CORRX, Inc., a medical device company (since 2011)

•  Corinth Medical, a medical device company (since 2011)

•  RELIGN Corporation, a medical device company (since 2011)

•  MOSIAX, Inc., a medical device company (since 2011)

Prior Directorships:

•  Arqos Surgical, Inc., a technology holding company (2011-2015)

•  IOGYN, Inc., a medical device company (2011-2014)

•  Neomend, a designer of surgical sealants and adhesion prevention products (acquired by CR Bard) (2010-2012)

•  Baxano, a private medical device manufacturer (2009-2011)

•  Dfine, Inc., a private electrosurgical system developer (2007-2011)

•  Sierra Surgical Technologies, a private surgical device company (2007-2011)

•  Other directorships completed prior to 2009 include: Pulmonx, a private medical device company (2003-2006); Conor Medsystems, a public developer of drug delivery technology (acquired by Johnson and Johnson) (2004-2007); St. Francis Medical Technology, a private medical device manufacturer (acquired by Kyphon/Medtronic) (2006); Novacept, a private medical device company (acquired by Cytyc/Hologic) (1999-2004); Focal, Inc., a public company developer of surgical sealants (acquired by Genzyme/Sanofi) (1994-1999)

Other Prior Experience:

Leadership — Current role as President and Chief Executive Officer, Novacept (1999-2004)CEO of Blucora, Inc. and prior executive management roles at Charles Schwab

•  President and Chief Executive Officer, Focal, Inc. (1994-1999)

•  Various management positions at Johnson & Johnson, a public company provider of professional consumer health care products and services (1977-1993)

Education:

•  Bachelor’s degree in Marketing from Bowling Green State University

 

LOGO

Banking/Financial Services — Extensive experience with banks and financial services companies through current roles at Blucora, Inc. and Betterment Holdings, Inc. as well as prior roles at Charles Schwab and First Union Corporation

 

6

Skills/ Qualifications:LOGO  

In particular, Mr. Clapper’s key areasBOARD & CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Proposal 1 — Election of skills/qualifications include, but are not limited to:

•  Client Industry – deep experience with both a variety of public and private life science companies (as part of management and/or as a director)

•  Leadership – current role as CEO of Minerva Surgical, as well as held other prior CEO positions of other life science companiesDirectors

 

5

LOGO     BOARD & CORPORATE GOVERNANCE


RogerROGER F. DunbarDUNBAR

DIRECTORSINCE 2004     Board Committees:

LOGO

 
Independent:

Mr. Dunbar, age 72, is our current Chairman of the Board of Directors, and subject to his election, he is expected to continue to serve as our Board Chairman during the 2018-2019 director term. Mr. Dunbar retired from Ernst & Young LLP (“Ernst & Young”) in 2004, where he served in a variety of positions since 1974, including key leadership positions.

  Committees: RiskChair

(Chair), Audit,

Finance

and Governance

  Independent: Yes

Mr. Dunbar, age 70, is our current Chairman of the Board of Directors, and subject to his election, he is expected to continue to serve as our Board Chairman during the 2016-2017 director term. Mr. Dunbar retired from Ernst and Young in 2004, where he served in a variety of positions since 1974, including key leadership positions. Mr. Dunbar was appointed by the Board of Directors as a director of the Company in October 2004 and was first elected by stockholders in April 2005.

BUSINESS EXPERIENCE

PRIOR EXPERIENCE WITH ERNST & YOUNG:

Prior Experience with Ernst & Young:- 

•  Global Vice Chairman, Strategic Growth Markets and Venture Capital (2000-2004)

•  

-Member, Global Practice Council, London, United Kingdom (2000-2004)

•  

-Member, Global Management Committee, London, United Kingdom (2000-2004)

•  

-Member, of US Area Managing Partners Leadership Group (1992-2000)

-Other key positions, including Client Service Partner, and other key positions, including Partner-in-Charge and Area Managing Partner, Silicon Valley and the Pacific Northwest Area (1974-2000)

PRIOR DIRECTORSHIPS:

Prior Directorships:- 

•  Advisory Board Member, SVB Financial Group and Silicon Valley Bank (2001-2004)

��  Desert Mountain Club, Inc. (2010-2015)

-Desert Mountain Property, Inc. (2009-2015)

•  Desert Mountain Club, Inc. (2009-2015)

(2009-2010)

OTHER PRIOR EXPERIENCE:

Other Prior Experience:- 

•  Various positions within Ernst & Young: Global Vice Chairman, Strategic Growth Markets and Venture Capital (2000-2004); Member, Global Practice Council, London, United Kingdom (2000-2004); Member, Global Management Committee, London, United Kingdom (2000-2004); Member, US Area Managing Partners Leadership Group (1992-2000); and other key positions, including Client Service Partner, Partner-in-Charge and Area Managing Partner, Silicon Valley and the Pacific Northwest Area (1974-2000), and Instructor for the National Education Program.

-Instructor, Santa Clara University’s Graduate School of Business

•  Instructor, Ernst & Young’s National Education Program

•  

-Advisory Boards, Santa Clara University and Cal Poly San Luis Obispo

-Member, Joint Venture Silicon Valley’s 21st21st Century Education Board

•  

-U.S. Naval Officer (1967-1980)

EDUCATION:

Education:- 

•  Bachelor’s degree in Business from San Francisco State University

•  

-Master’s degree in Business Administration from Santa Clara University

•  

-Certified public accountant, inactive, and a member of the California State Board of Accountancy and the AICPA

QUALIFICATIONS

 

 

Skills/ Qualifications:

LOGO

 

In particular, Mr. Dunbar’sLeadership — Held a variety of key areasexecutive positions, including Global Vice Chairman of skills/qualifications include, but are not limited to:Ernst & Young

 

•  

LOGO

Client Industry andGlobal – deep— Deep experience working with both public and private companies and venture capital firms through Ernst & Young, as well as in the global markets, particularly in the United Kingdom and Israel

•  

LOGO

LeadershipGlobal – held a variety of key executive positions, including Global Vice Chairman of— Deep experience working with both public and private companies and venture capital firms through Ernst & Young, as well as in the global markets, particularly in the United Kingdom and Israel

•  

LOGO

FinanceFinance/Accountingand Risk Management– extensive — Extensive domestic and international capital markets, finance, accounting and audit experience with Ernst & Young

LOGO

Risk Oversight/Management — Deep experience auditing risk management controls through his roles at Ernst & Young

 

67

LOGO

BOARD & CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Proposal 1 — Election of Directors

LOGO     BOARD & CORPORATE GOVERNANCE


JoelJOEL P. FriedmanFRIEDMAN

DIRECTORSINCE 2004     Board Committees:LOGO 
Independent:

Mr. Friedman, age 70, retired from Accenture PLC (“Accenture”), a public company global management-consulting firm, in 2005, where he held the position of President of the Business Process Outsourcing organization. Over the course of his 34-year career with Accenture, Mr. Friedman held a variety of senior leadership roles.

  Committees: FinanceChair

(Chair), Governance

and Risk

  Independent: Yes

Mr. Friedman, age 68, retired from Accenture, a public company global management consulting firm in 2005, where he held the position of President of the Business Process Outsourcing (“BPO”) organization. Over the course of his 34-year career with Accenture, Mr. Friedman held a variety of senior leadership roles. Mr. Friedman was appointed by the Board of Directors as a director of the Company in October 2004 and was first elected by stockholders in April 2005.

BUSINESS EXPERIENCE

CURRENT PRIVATE DIRECTORSHIPS/OTHER EXPERIENCE:

Public Directorships:- 

•  Advisory Director, FTV Capital (formerly Financial Technology Ventures) (since 2005)

-Advisory Director, Community Gatepath, a non-profit organization (since 2013; director from 1991-2012)

PRIOR DIRECTORSHIPS:

-NeuStar, Inc., a provider of essential clearinghouse services to the communications industry (since 2006)

(2006-2017) (acquired)
Private Directorships:- 

•  Advisory Director, FTV Capital (formerly Financial Technology Ventures) (since 2005)

•  Advisory Director, Community Gatepath, a non-profit organization dedicated to enabling persons with disabilities to live as fully integrated members of the community (since 2013; director from 1991-2012)

Prior Experience with Accenture:

•  President of the BPO organization

•  Managing Partner, Banking and Capital Markets

•  Managing General Partner, Accenture Technology Ventures

•  Founder, Accenture strategy consulting practice

Prior Directorships:

•  EXL Services (Advisory Director), a provider of offshore business process outsourcing solutions (2008-2011)

•  

-Endeca Technologies, Inc., a provider of enterprise search solutions (2006-2011) (acquired by Oracle)

•  (acquired)

-Junior Achievement of Northern California, a non-profit organization that assists young people understand the economics of life (2004-2010)

•  

-Other directorships completed prior to 2009 include:include Accenture, a global management consultingmanagement-consulting firm (2001-2005); Seisint, Inc.; Calico Commerce, Inc.; Rivio Inc.; and TheBrainThe Brain Technologies.

OTHER PRIOR EXPERIENCE:

Other Prior Experience:- 

•  Various roles within Accenture: President of the Business Process Outsourcing organization; Managing Partner, Banking and Capital Markets; Managing General Partner, Accenture Technology Ventures; and Founder, Accenture strategy consulting practice

-Dean’s Advisory Council for Stanford Graduate School of Business (1998-2004)

EDUCATION:

Education:- 

•  Bachelor’s degree in Economics from Yale University

•  

-Master’s degree in Business Administration from Stanford University

QUALIFICATIONS

 

Skills/ Qualifications:

LOGO

 

In particular, Mr. Friedman’s key areas of skills/qualifications include, but are not limited to:

•  Client Industryand Banking/Financial Services– extensive experience working with venture capital firms and within the banking industry through Accenture

•  Leadership – held— Held a variety of key executive positions, including President of the Business Process Outsourcing organization within Accenture

•  

LOGO

FinanceClient Industry– deep — Extensive experience working with venture capital firms through Accenture

LOGO

Banking/Financial Services — Extensive experience working within the banking industry through Accenture

LOGO

Finance/Accounting — Deep experience with corporate finance and capital markets through Accenture

 

78

LOGO

BOARD & CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Proposal 1 — Election of Directors

LOGO     BOARD & CORPORATE GOVERNANCE


Lata KrishnanKIMBERLY A. JABAL

Board Committees:Independent:

•     Audit

•     Finance

  YesNEW DIRECTOR NOMINEE    
LOGO

Ms. Krishnan,Jabal, age 55,49, is currently the Chief Financial Officer of Shah Capital Partners (“Shah Capital”)Weebly, Inc., a leading mid-market technology private equity fund that she joined upon its inception in 2003.provider of web-hosting and e-commerce services. Prior to joining Shah Capital,Weebly, Inc. in 2015, Ms. Krishnan heldJabal previously served as Chief Financial Officer of Path, Inc., a social networking technology company, from 2013-2015, and as Vice President of Finance at Lytro, Inc., an early stage technology company, from 2011-2012. Ms. Jabal served in various corporate accountingroles at Google, Goldman Sachs and finance positionsAndersen Consulting (now Accenture).

  Committees: N/A

Independent: Yes

BUSINESS EXPERIENCE

CURRENT PUBLIC DIRECTORSHIPS:

-FedEx Corporation, a multinational transportation and delivery service company (2013-present)

CURRENT PRIVATE DIRECTORSHIPS/OTHER EXPERIENCE:

-Bring Change 2 Mind, an organization devoted to removing the stigma associated with leading financial firms. Ms. Krishnan was appointed by the Boardmental illness (2014-present)

PRIOR DIRECTORSHIPS:

-Menlo Park Atherton Education Foundation, a non-profit education organization (2011-2013)

OTHER PRIOR EXPERIENCE:

-Various roles at Google (2003-2011), including Director of Directors as a directorFinance and Director of the CompanyInvestor Relations
-Technology investment banking roles at Goldman Sachs (2000-2002)
-Various technology and software development roles at Andersen Consulting (now Accenture) (1990-1998)

EDUCATION:

-Bachelor’s degree in February 2008 and was first elected by stockholdersEngineering from University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
-Master’s degree in April 2008.

Business Administration from Harvard University

QUALIFICATIONS

PrivateLOGO

Directorships:

 

•  Chair, American India Foundation, an organization dedicated to accelerating socialFinance/Accounting — Deep experience with corporate finance and economic development in India (since 2001)accounting through current role as Chief Financial Officer of Weebly, Inc. and prior financial leadership roles at Path, Inc. and Lytro, Inc.

•  The Commonwealth Club, a public affairs forum (since 2004)

OtherLOGO

Experience:

 

•  Fellow, American Leadership Forum (since 1998)

Prior

Directorships:

•  Enlighted,Client Industry — Extensive experience serving in leadership roles in early-stage technology companies Path, Inc., an information and Lytro, Inc. and established technology company Google, Inc. as well as technology banking and internet technology consulting firm (2010-2013)

•  TiE, a non-profit global network of entrepreneurs and professionals

•  Global Heritage Fund, an international heritage conservancy (2009-2011)

•  CEO Women, an organization to create economic opportunities for low-income immigrant and refugee women (2009-2011)

•  America’s Foundation for Chess, a foundation committed to children’s education (2003-2011)

•  Global Philanthropy Forum, a council on world affairs (2006-2011)

•  Narika, a shelter for abused women in the Asian community (1998-2011)

Other Prior

Experience:

•  Co-Founder and Chief Financial Officer, SMART Modular Technologies, Inc., a manufacturer of computer memory modules (1989-1999)

•  Various corporate accounting and finance positions with Montgomery Services

•  Various corporate accounting and finance positions with Arthur Andersen & Company LLP

•  Various corporate accounting and finance positions with Hill Vellacott & Company in London

Education:

•  Bachelor’s degree with honors from the London School of Economics

•  Member of the Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales

experience

 

Skills/

Qualifications:

In particular, Ms. Krishnan’s key areas of skills/qualifications include, but are not limited to:

•  Client Industryand Finance– served as co-founder and chief financial officer of a technology company; experience with a leading technology private equity fund; served in a variety of accounting/finance positions

•  Global – deep experience in global markets, particularly in India and the United Kingdom

8

LOGO     BOARD & CORPORATE GOVERNANCE


JeffreyJEFFREY N. MaggioncaldaMAGGIONCALDA

DIRECTORSINCE 2012     Board Committees:LOGO Independent:

•     Compensation

•     Credit

Yes

Mr. Maggioncalda, age 47,49, is currently the formerChief Executive Officer of Coursera, Inc. (“Coursera”), an online education company. He previously served as the founding Chief Executive Officer of Financial Engines, anInc. (“Financial Engines”), a publicly-held independent investment advisory firm. Mr. Maggioncalda served in this rolefirm, since Financial Engines’sits inception in 1996 until 2014. Mr. MaggioncaldaHe also served as a director of the companyFinancial Engines from 2011 to 2014. Subsequent to his tenure at Financial Engines, Mr. Maggioncalda was first electedserved as a director of thesenior advisor to McKinsey & Company, by the stockholders in April 2012.a global management-consulting firm.

  Committees: Credit and Compensation

Independent: Yes

BUSINESS EXPERIENCE

PRIOR DIRECTORSHIPS:

Prior Directorships:- 

•   Financial Engines, an independent investment advisory firm (2011-2014)

•   

-Affinity Circles, a social networking developer

OTHER PRIOR EXPERIENCE:

Other Prior Experience:- 

•   Summer Associate,Senior Adviser, McKinsey & Co., a strategy consulting firm (1995)

•   (2017)

-Associate, Cornerstone Research, an economic and financial consulting firm (1991-1994)

EDUCATION:

Education:- 

•   Bachelor’s degree in Economics and English from Stanford University

•   

-Master’s degree in Business Administration from Stanford University

QUALIFICATIONS

LOGO

Leadership — Current and former roles as CEO of Coursera and Financial Engines

 

Skills/ Qualifications:

LOGO

 

In particular, Mr. Maggioncalda’s key areas of skills/qualifications include, but are not limited to:

•   Leadership– former role as CEO and director of Financial Engines

•   Banking/Financial Services – extensive— Extensive experience in the investment advisory industry

 

9

LOGO

BOARD & CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Proposal 1 — Election of Directors


MaryMARY J. MillerMILLER

DIRECTORSINCE 2015     Board Committees:LOGO Independent:

•     Finance

Yes

Ms. Miller, age 60,62, is the former Under Secretary for Domestic Finance for the U.S. Department of the Treasury (“U.S. Treasury”Treasury)., a position that she held following her confirmation by the U.S. Senate from March 2012 until September 2014. Ms. Miller also served in two Presidential appointments at the U.S. Treasury, from her Senate confirmation as Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Financial Markets following her confirmation by the U.S. Senate in February 2010 through her subsequent confirmation as Under Secretary of Domestic Finance in 2012 until SeptemberJune 2014. Prior to joining the U.S. Treasury, Ms. Miller held various positions with T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. from 1983 to 2009. Ms. Miller was appointed by the Board of Directors as a director of the Company in May 2015.

  Committees: Audit and Finance

Independent: Yes

BUSINESS EXPERIENCE

CURRENT PRIVATE DIRECTORSHIPS/OTHER EXPERIENCE:

Private Directorships:- 

•   The Jeffrey Company, an investment company (since 2016)

-Trustee, Cornell University, a higher education institution (since 2015)

•   ICE Benchmark Association, a unit of the Intercontinental Exchange (“ICE”) (since 2014)

Other Experience:- 

•   Trustee, The Urban Institute, a non-profit research organization (since 2014)

PRIOR DIRECTORSHIPS:

Other Prior Experience:- 

•   ICE Benchmark Association, a unit of the Intercontinental Exchange (2014-2018)

OTHER PRIOR EXPERIENCE:

-Director, Fixed Income Division, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., a global investment management firm (2004-2010)

•   (2004-2009)

-Various investment management positions with T. Rowe Price Group

EDUCATION:

Education:- 

•   Bachelor’s degree in Government from Cornell University

•   

-Master’s degree in City and Regional Planning, from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

•   

-Chartered Financial Analyst (CFA)

QUALIFICATIONS

 

 

Skills/ Qualifications:

LOGO

 

In particular, Ms. Miller’s key areas of skills/qualifications include, but are not limited to:

•   Leadership – held— Held key leadership positions within the U.S. Treasury

•   

LOGO

Banking/Financial Services – extensive— Extensive experience in financial markets, including regulatory experience; deep experience in the investment advisory industry

LOGO

Finance/Accounting— Extensive experience in financial roles, including within the U.S. Treasury

LOGO

Government/Regulatory— Served in key positions within the U.S. Treasury

 

910

LOGO     BOARD & CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
LOGO

BOARD & CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Proposal 1 — Election of Directors


KateKATE D. MitchellMITCHELL

DIRECTORSINCE 2010     BoardLOGO

Ms. Mitchell, age 59, is Managing Partner and Co-Founder of Scale Venture Partners (“Scale Venture”), a venture capital firm that invests in enterprise software companies, and is instrumental in building the firm’s team and strategic direction. Prior to founding Scale Venture in 1996, Ms. Mitchell held a variety of senior management positions with Bank of America.

  Committees: Compensation (Chair), Credit and Risk

  Independent:
Yes 

•     Compensation,Chair

BUSINESS EXPERIENCE

CURRENT PUBLIC DIRECTORSHIPS:

•     Audit

•     Risk

- YesFortive Corporation, a worldwide provider of professional instrumentation and industrial technologies (since 2016)

Ms. Mitchell, age 57, is Managing Partner and Co-Founder of Scale Venture Partners (“Scale”), a venture capital firm where she leads investments in software and business services and is instrumental in building the firm’s team and strategic direction. Prior to founding Scale in 1996, Ms. Mitchell held a variety of senior management positions with Bank of America. Ms. Mitchell was elected by stockholders as a director of the Company in April 2010.CURRENT PRIVATE DIRECTORSHIPS/OTHER EXPERIENCE:

Private Directorships:- 

•  mBlox, Inc.Member, Steering Committee, Private Equity Women Investor Network, a forum for senior women in private equity (since 2010)

-Member, NASDAQ Private Market Advisory Council, an advisory forum related to private capital markets (since 2014)
-Founding Chair and Member, NVCA Diversity Task Force (Venture Forward), a mobile transaction network providerforum to increase opportunities for women and minorities in venture capital and entrepreneurship (since 2010)

•  PeopleMatter (PMW Technologies, Inc.),2014)

-Silicon Valley Community Foundation, a provider of human resource management solutionsnon-profit organization (since 2014)2015)
-Mentor, Kauffman Fellows, a venture capital leadership development organization (since 2016)

PRIOR DIRECTORSHIPS:

•  
-National Venture Capital Association (“NVCA”), a trade association focused on regulatory and economic policy impacting the venture industry and the companies that are funded by venture capital (2007-2011 and since 2014)

2014-2016)

Other

Experience:

-
 

•  Member, Steering Committee, Private Equity Women Investor Network,PeopleMatter (PMW Technologies, Inc.), a forum for senior women in private equity (since 2010)

•  Member, Nasdaq Private Market Advisory Council, an advisory forum related to private capital markets (since 2014)

•  Co-Chair, NVCA Diversity Task Force, a forum to increase opportunities for women and minorities in venture capital and entrepreneurship (since 2014)

•  Silicon Valley Community Foundation, a non-profit organization advising philanthropicprovider of human resource management solutions for regional and global issues (since 2015)

(2014-2016)
Prior Directorships:- 

•  Wayport, Inc. (2000-2008)

•  Friends of the San Francisco Public Library (2007-2010)

•  Chairman, National Venture Capital Association (2010-2011)

•  Member of National Venture Capital Association Executive Committee (2007-2011)

•  Jaspersoft,mBlox, Inc., a manufacturer of business intelligence software (2009-2014)

•  mobile transaction network provider (acquired by CLX Communications (2010 - 2016)

-New Century Hospice, a provider of hospice services for patients, families and healthcare providers (2014-2015)

•  

-Jaspersoft, Inc., a manufacturer of business intelligence software (2009-2014)
-Friends of the San Francisco Public Library (2007-2010)
-Wayport, Inc. (2000-2008)
-Other directorships completed prior to 2009 include: Songbird Medical (1998-2005); Acusphere, Inc., a public pharmaceutical company (1999-2005); Tonic Software, Inc. (2000-2005); Pavilion Technologies, Inc. (2004-2007)

OTHER PRIOR EXPERIENCE:

Other Prior Experience:- 

•  Silicon Valley Bank Venture Capital Advisory Board (2008-2013)

•  

-Various senior management positions in finance and technology (including Senior Vice President), at Bank of America

•  

-Various finance and lending positions at Bank of California (now Union Bank of California)

EDUCATION:

Education:- 

•  Bachelor’s degree in Political Science from Stanford University

•  

-Master’s degree in Business Administration from Golden Gate University

QUALIFICATIONS

 

 

Skills/ Qualifications:

LOGO

 

In particular, Ms. Mitchell’s key areasLeadership— Based on her role as managing partner and co-founder of skills/qualifications include, but are not limited to:Scale Venture

 

•  

LOGO

Client Industry– deep— Deep experience and knowledge of the venture capital industrycapitalindustry and innovation companies (as a venture capital investor and/or a director); current role as co-founder and managing partner of Scale VenturesVenture

•  

LOGO

Banking/Financial Services– held— Held a variety of key executive positions at Bank of America, a large global bank

•  

LOGO

Finance – extensive/Accounting— Extensive finance and asset/liability management experience at two nationally-recognized banksBank of America and Bank of California

 

1011

LOGO

BOARD & CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Proposal 1 — Election of Directors

LOGO     BOARD & CORPORATE GOVERNANCE


JohnJOHN F. RobinsonROBINSON

DIRECTORSINCE 2010     BoardLOGO

Mr. Robinson, age 71, is a former Executive Vice President, Corporate Risk Management of Washington Mutual Bank, a financial lending institution. Prior to his position with Washington Mutual, Mr. Robinson served with the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency as a Deputy Comptroller.

  Committees: Audit (Chair), Compensation, Credit and Risk

  Independent:
Yes 

•     Audit,Chair

BUSINESS EXPERIENCE

CURRENT PUBLIC DIRECTORSHIPS:

•     Compensation

•     Credit

•     Risk

- Yes
Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco (from 2004-2005 and 2007-2008, and since 2011)

Mr. Robinson, age 69, is a former Executive Vice President of Washington Mutual Bank, a financial lending institution. Prior to his position with Washington Mutual, Mr. Robinson served with the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency as a Deputy Comptroller. Mr. Robinson was appointed by the Board of Directors as a director of the Company in July 2010 and was first elected by stockholders in April 2011.PRIOR DIRECTORSHIPS:

Public Directorships:- 

•  Vogogo, Inc., a Canadian based provider of verification tools for risk management and payment processing (since 2015)

•  Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco (since 2011)

(2015-2016)

Other

Experience:

-
 

•  National Outdoor Leadership School Advisory Committee (since 2007)

Prior Directorships:

•  Operation HOPE, a non-profit organization focusing on economic improvements for poverty-stricken people in America (2004-2013)

•  Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco (2004-2005 and 2007-2008)

•  

-Long Beach Mortgage Corporation aand Long Beach Securities Corporation, both wholly-owned subsidiarysubsidiaries of Washington Mutual Bank (2004-2006)

•  Long Beach Securities Corporation, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Washington Mutual Bank (2004-2006)

OTHER PRIOR EXPERIENCE:

Other Prior Experience:- 

•  National Outdoor Leadership School Advisory Committee (2007-2016)

-Executive Vice President, Corporate Risk Management, Washington Mutual Bank, a financial lending institution (2002-2008)

•  

-Deputy Comptroller, Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (1997-2002)

EDUCATION:

Education:- 

•  Bachelor’s degree in Business Administration from Washington University in St. Louis

•  

-Master’s degree in Business Administration from Harvard University

•  

-Chartered Financial Analyst (CFA)

QUALIFICATIONS

 

 

Skills/ Qualifications:

LOGO

 

In particular, Mr. Robinson’s key areas of skills/qualifications include, but are not limited to:

•  Banking/Financial Services – deep— Extensive experience within the banking industry, including his roles at Washington Mutual Bank, a nationally recognized financial lending institution, and regulatory experience, especially as a former bankbanking regulator at the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency

•  

LOGO

Risk Oversight/Management– held— Held a variety of executive risk management positions at Washington Mutual Bank

LOGO

Government/Regulatory— Served in a nationally-recognized bankkey function at the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency

 

1112

LOGO

BOARD & CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Proposal 1 — Election of Directors

LOGO     BOARD & CORPORATE GOVERNANCE


GarenGAREN K. StaglinSTAGLIN

DIRECTORSINCE 2011     Board Committees:LOGO Independent:

•     Compensation

•     Governance

Yes

Mr. Staglin, age 71,73, is the founder and proprietor of Staglin Family Vineyard, founded in 1985 in the Rutherford region of Napa Valley. Over the past 40 years, Mr. Staglin has also held a variety of positions in the financial and insurance services industries. Mr. Staglin was appointed by the Board of Directors as a director of the Company in August 2011

  Committees: Compensation and was first elected by stockholders in April 2012.Governance

Independent: Yes

BUSINESS EXPERIENCE

CURRENT PUBLIC DIRECTORSHIPS:

Public Directorships:- 

•  Chairman, EXL Services,ExlService Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: EXLS), a provider of outsourcing services to global companies (since 2005)

CURRENT PRIVATE DIRECTORSHIPS:

Private Directorships:- 

•  Senior Advisor and Advisory Director, FTV Capital (formerly Financial Technology Ventures), (since 2004)

•  

-Vice Chairman, Profit Velocity Solutions, a manufacturing analytics firm (since 2007)

•  

-Chairman, Nvoice Payments, an electronic payment service provider (since 2010)

OTHER EXPERIENCE:

Other

Experience:

-
 

•  Founder and President, International Mental Health Research Organization, devoted to raising awareness and funding research to find a cure for major mental illnesses (since 1995)

•  FounderCo-Founder and Co-Chairman, One Mind, 4 Research, a non-profit organization devoted to accelerating cures and treatments for all brain disorders (since 2010)

1995)

PRIOR DIRECTORSHIPS:

Prior Directorships:- 

•  Advisory Director, Specialized Bicycle, a manufacturer of cycling equipment (1995-2014)

•  

-Chairman, Free Run Technologies, an internet and technology services company (2003-2014)

•  

-Bottomline Technologies, a provider of payment and invoice automation software and services (2007-2012)

•  

-Advisory Board, Blaze Mobile, a mobile payments company (2006-2011)

•  Global Document Solutions, a document processing outsourcing company (2005-2010)

•  

-Solera Holdings, Inc., ana public automotive insurance software service provider (2005-2011)

•  

-Global Document Solutions, a private document processing outsourcing company (2005-2010)
-Other directorships completed prior to 2009 include: First Data Corporation, a payment solutions provider (1992-2003); Quick Response Services, a public retail management and supply chain services company (1991-2001); CyberCash, Inc., a public micro-payments and platform company (1996-2000); Chairman, Safelite Auto Glass, a private national auto glass provider (1993-1999)

OTHER PRIOR EXPERIENCE:

Other Prior Experience:- 

•  Founder and President, Bring Change 2 Mind, an organization devoted to removing the stigma associated with mental illness (2009-2014)

EDUCATION:

Education:- 

•  Bachelor’s degree in Engineering-Electrical and Nuclear from the University of California, Los Angeles

•  

-Master’s degree in Business Administration, Finance and Systems Analysis from Stanford University Graduate School of Business

QUALIFICATIONS

 

 

Skills/ Qualifications:

LOGO

 

In particular, Mr. Staglin’s key areasLeadership— Held a variety of skills/qualifications include, but are not limited to:leadership roles, including board positions, as well as other founder and president roles with various non-profit organizations

 

•  

LOGO

Client Industryand Banking/Financial Services– extensive— Extensive experience working within the premium wine and transaction/payment processing industries, as well as experience working with innovation companies (asas a director)director

•  

LOGO

LeadershipBanking/Financial Services – held a variety of leadership roles, including his Chairman role with EXL Services as well as other founder and president roles with various non-profit organizations— Extensive experience working within transaction/payment processing industries

 

1213

LOGO

BOARD & CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Proposal 1 — Election of Directors

LOGO     BOARD & CORPORATE GOVERNANCE


CORPORATE GOVERNANCE PRINCIPLES AND BOARD MATTERS

We are committed to having sound corporate governance principles.practices, as outlined in our Corporate Governance Principles. These principles are important to the way in which we manage our business and to maintaining our integrity in the marketplace,marketplace. They provide a framework for our Company with respect to corporate governance practices and are discussed in further detail inreviewed at least annually by the Governance Committee, as well as amended from time to time to continue to enhance our Corporate Governance Guidelines. (Agovernance structure. A copy of our guidelines is available atwww.svb.com under “About Us—Investor Relations—Corporate Governance.” The contents of the website are not incorporated herein by reference and the website address provided above and throughout this Proxy Statement is intended to be an inactive textual reference only.)

Board Independence and LeadershipBOARD INDEPENDENCEAND LEADERSHIP

The Board has determined that, with the exception of Mr. Becker, our President and CEO, all of our current directors and(and director nominees,nominees) are “independent” within the meaning of the director independence standards set by NasdaqThe NASDAQ Stock Market LLC (“NASDAQ”) and the Securities Exchange Commission (the “SEC as currently in effect.”).

Additionally, our Amended and Restated Bylaws (“Bylaws”) provide that the Board shall not have more than two (2) directors who do not meet the definition of an “Outside Director.” AnFor these purposes, an Outside Director is any director who meets the independence and experience requirements of NASDAQ and the SEC and Nasdaq Stock Market, Inc. (“Nasdaq”) and who, in the opinion of the Board, has the ability to exercise independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director of the Company. All of our current directors, except for our CEO, are considered Outside Directors.

Separate Chairperson/Chairperson and CEO Roles

The Board has determined that it is in the best interests of the Company to continue to maintain the Board chairperson and CEO positions separately. We believe that having an outside, independent director serve as chairperson is the most appropriate leadership structure for the Board at this time, as it enhances the Board’s independent oversight of management and strategic planning, reinforces the Board’s ability to exercise its independent judgment to represent stockholder interests and strengthens the objectivity and integrity of the Board. Moreover, we believe an independent chairperson can more effectively lead the Board in objectively evaluating the performance of management, including the CEO, and guide the Board through appropriate governance processes. The Board of Directors periodically reviews the Company’s leadership structure and may modify the structure as it deems appropriate given the specific circumstances then facing the Company.

Independence and

Leadership Structure

•  Separation of Chairperson and CEO roles

•  Allnon-employee directors are independent under applicable stock exchange and SEC rules

•  Independent Committee Chairs

•  Regularly scheduled executive sessions

The Board has determined that it is in the best interests of the Company to maintain the Board chairperson and CEO positions separately. It believes that having an outside, independent director serve as chairperson is the most appropriate leadership structure for the Board, as it enhances the Board’s independent oversight of management and our strategic planning, reinforces the Board’s ability to exercise its independent judgment to represent stockholder interests, and strengthens the objectivity and integrity of the Board. Moreover, an independent chairperson can more effectively lead the Board in objectively evaluating the performance of management, including the CEO, and guide it through appropriate Board governance processes.

Mr. Dunbar, our current Chairman of the Board, is independent within the meaning of the director independence standards described above. Subject to his election, Mr. Dunbar is expected to serve as the Board’s Chairman for the 2016-20172018-2019 director term.

Executive Sessions

The Company’s independent directors meet in regularly scheduled executive sessions at which only independent directors are present.

Board Risk Oversight and Risk CommitteeBOARD RISK OVERSIGHTAND RISK COMMITTEE

Oversight of the Company’s risk management is one of the Board’s key priorities and is carried out both by the Board as a whole, as well as by each of its various committees.

In January 2015, the The Board has formed a committee to specifically focus on the Company’s risk management. Our Risk Committee is comprised of the chairpersons of each of the Board and the Audit, Compensation, Credit, Finance and Governance Committees. The Risk Committee has the primary oversight responsibility forof the Company’s enterprise-wide risk management (“EWRM”) framework, including the oversight of risk management policies, and the monitoring of the Company’s risk profile. In addition, the Risk Committeeit is responsible for overseeing the Company’s compliance with its risk appetite statement, which sets forth the tolerance levels with respect to the amount and types of various acceptable key risks underlying the Company’s business. The Risk Committee also oversees compliance with,reviews, and recommends any changes for Board approval to, the Company’s risk appetite statement. Our other Board committees also share responsibility for the risk appetite statement by overseeing and approving applicable risk metrics, including risk limits and thresholds, for each of their relevant areas of responsibility.

14

LOGO

BOARD & CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Corporate Governance Principles


Additionally, each Board committee is engaged in overseeing the Company’s risks in itsas they relate to that committee’s respective areas of oversight. For example, the Audit Committee regularly oversees our risks relating to our accounting and financial reporting, as well as legal, information technology and security-related risks. The Compensation Committee engages in periodic risk assessments to review and evaluate our compensation programsrisks in relation to our risks.compensation programs. The Finance Committee actively oversees our capital liquidity and financialliquidity management and the associated risks (whether as an ongoing matter or as it relates specifically to a transaction, such as an equity or debt securities offering). Our Governance Committee oversees our compliance functions and routinely reviews our compliance risks. Moreover, the Credit Committee routinely oversees our management of credit risks. Each committee chairperson regularly reports back to both the Risk Committee and the full Board on its risk oversight activities. In addition, the Board routinely engages in discussions with management about the Company’s risks.risk profile.

ANNUAL BOARD EVALUATION

 

13

LOGO     BOARD & CORPORATE GOVERNANCE


Annual Board Evaluation

The Governance Committee of the Board, conducts, in coordination with the full Board, anconducts a periodic evaluation of the Board’s performance and effectiveness, either the Board as a whole and/or on an individual director basis. The Governance Committee develops and implements a process for such evaluation and review, which may involve outside consultants or advisers and may include a review of how certain attributes affect Board effectiveness, such as Board size, meeting frequency, quality and timing of information provided to the Board, director communication, director education, director skills and qualifications, director independence and Board strategy sessions. The results of the evaluation are discussed with the Board. The Governance Committee also leads an evaluation of the performance and effectiveness of each of the Board’s committees. All Board and committee evaluations are typically conducted on an annual basis. SeeBoard “Board Committees—Committee GovernanceGovernance”below.

Board Succession PlanningOVERSIGHTOF CEOAND EXECUTIVES

The Board’s succession planning is primarily overseen by the Governance Committee. Such planning takes into account the balancing of the appropriate representation of experience and skills on the Board, with the importance of Board refreshment. Identifying possible director candidates that possess the appropriate qualifications and the desire to serve on a financial services public company board, as well as who will complement our existing Board, takes time and effort. As such, the Governance Committee discusses recruiting strategies and actively considers potential director candidates, whether or not there is an immediate vacancy on the Board to fill. The Governance Committee also reports to and discusses succession planning with the full Board.

In 2015, the Board added one new director (Ms. Mary Miller) who brings a scope of skills, experience and perspectives to enhance the already well-rounded Board of Directors.

Oversight of CEO

Annual CEO Performance Evaluation

The independent members of the Board evaluate the performance of our CEO on an annual basis. Each year, the Governance Committee approves thea process to solicit the Board’s feedback.feedback from each individual independent director. Our Chairman of the Board, together with the chairpersons of the Governance and Compensation Committees, then lead discussions with the Board (without the CEO present) to evaluate the CEO’s performance, both generally as well as against certain predetermined annual goals.

CEO and Executive Succession Planning

As a matter of sound governance, the Board, as a whole or from time to time through a special committee, of the Board, routinely reviews and discusses the Company’s contingency or long-term plans for CEO and executive succession. The special committee seeksThese efforts involve seeking input from our current CEO and our Head ofChief Human Resources Officer, as well as external advisors, as the Board deems appropriate. Succession plans are reviewed and discussed by the Board on at least an annual basis.

DIRECTOR MATTERS

Outside Directorships

We encourage all directors to carefully consider the number of other company boards of directors on which they serve, taking into account the time required for board attendance, conflicts of interests, participation, and effectiveness on these boards. Directors are asked to report all directorships, including advisory positions, accepted, as well as to notify the Governance Committee in advance of accepting any invitation to serve on another public company board.

Director Education and Orientation

The specialBoard believes that ongoing director education is important for maintaining a current and effective Board. Accordingly, the Board encourages directors to be continually educated on matters pertinent to his or her service on the Board. It is the Board’s view that continuing education may be achieved in various ways as appropriate for each individual director, including, among other things, participation in formal education programs, conferences or seminars (the reasonable expenses of which are reimbursable by the Company) or through independent study or outside reading. In addition, from time to time, management may also bring education opportunities to the Board through management presentations, additional education materials or outside speakers.

15

LOGO

BOARD & CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Corporate Governance Principles


New directors joining the Board also participate in a director orientation program, which involves a variety of informational sessions about our business, strategy and governance with Board members and members of executive and senior management. New directors typically join at least one Board committee upon joining the Board, and are also reportsinvited to and discusses any such plans withparticipate as a guest director at the full Board.meetings of the other Board committees.

Meeting AttendanceMEETING ATTENDANCE

Board and Committee Meetings

The Board and its standing committees held a total of fifty-four (54) meetings during 2017. The Board itself held eight (8) meetings during fiscalthe year, 2015. For the number of committee meetings held in 2015, see “Board Committees—Committee Chairpersons/Membership, Responsibilities and Meetings” below.including atwo-day annual session focused on strategic planning. Each director attended in person or via teleconference 75% or more of the total number of meetings of the Board and of the committees on which he or she served which were held during the period for which he or she was a director or committee member.2017.

  54  Total Board and  Committee Meetings in 2017  

2017  Meetings    

    Board

8    

    Audit

11    

    Compensation

8    

    Credit

6    

    Finance

10    

    Governance

6    

    Risk

5    

Stockholder Meetings

It is the Board’s policy that each director employs his or her best efforts to attend each of our annual stockholder meetings. EightTen (10) of our eleven (11) then-serving Board members attended our 20152017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

BOARD REFRESHMENT; CONSIDERATIONOF DIRECTOR NOMINEES

 

14Board Refreshment and Succession Planning

LOGO     BOARD & CORPORATE GOVERNANCE


Consideration of Director Nominees

Stockholder Nominees

The Governance Committee primarily oversees the refreshment or succession planning of Board membership. Succession planning takes into account the importance of balancing the appropriate representation of experience and skills on the Board, with the benefits of Board refreshment. Identification of possible director candidates that possess the appropriate qualifications, desire to serve on a financial services public company board and are able to complement our existing Board can be a lengthy process. As such and as an ongoing matter, the Governance Committee discusses recruiting strategies and actively considers potential director candidates, whether or not there is an immediate vacancy on the Board to fill. It may from time to time use outside recruiters to assist with identifying potential candidates. The Governance Committee also reports to, and discusses director succession planning with, the full Board.

Based on the recruiting efforts of, and recommendations from, the Governance Committee, the Board appointed a new director during the 2017-2018 director term, and nominated a new director nominee for election at the Annual Meeting. Mr. John Clendening joined the Board in August 2017 and Ms. Kimberly Jabal has been nominated for election to join the Board for the 2018-2019 director term.

Board Diversity; Selection and Evaluation of Director Candidates

While the Board has not formally adopted a policy governing board diversity, it is focused on assembling a well-rounded, diverse body of directors. The Governance Committee, with the participation of the full Board, is primarily responsible for reviewing the composition of the Board and identifying candidates for membership on the Board in light of our ongoing requirements, the committee’s assessment of the Board’s performance and any input received from stockholders or other key constituencies. The Governance Committee makes determinations as to whether to recommend directors forre-election or director candidates for nomination to the Board based on such individual’s skills, character, judgment and business experience, as well as his or her ability to diversify and add to the Board’s existing strengths. Overall, the Governance Committee typically seeks an appropriate mix of individuals with diverse backgrounds and skills complementary to our business and strategic direction. Please see the description under “Director Qualifications” above for additional information.

16

LOGO

BOARD & CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Corporate Governance Principles


Stockholder Nominees

The Governance Committee considers director candidates it identifies, but will also consider Board nominees proposed by stockholders. The Governance Committee has no formal policy with regard to stockholder nominees as itand considers all nominees on their merits, as discussed below. Any stockholder nominations proposed for consideration by the Governance Committee should include the nominee’s name and qualifications for Board membership, and should be addressed to:

SVB Financial Group,

3003 Tasman Drive,

Santa Clara, California 95054,

Attn: General Counsel and Corporate Secretary,

Facsimile:(408) 969-6500969-6500.

In addition, our Bylaws permit stockholders to nominate directors for consideration at an annual stockholder meeting. For a description of the process for nominating directors in accordance with the Bylaws, please see “Stockholder Proposals and Director Nominations” below.

Board Diversity; Selection and Evaluation of Director CandidatesCOMMUNICATIONSWITHTHE BOARD

While the Board has not formally adopted a policy governing board diversity, it recognizes the importance of assembling a well-rounded, diverse body of directors. The Governance Committee, with the participation of the full Board, is primarily responsible for reviewing the composition of the Board and for identifying candidates for membership on the Board, all in light of our ongoing requirements, its assessment of the Board’s performance and any input received from stockholders or other key constituencies. The Governance Committee makes determinations as to whether to recommend directors for re-election or director candidates’ nomination to the Board based on their skills, character, judgment and business experience, as well as their ability to diversify and add to the Board’s existing strengths. The Governance Committee typically seeks an appropriate mix of individuals with diverse backgrounds and skills complementary to our business and strategic direction. In addition to the areas of director qualifications and attributes discussed under “Director Qualifications” above, this assessment includes consideration of areas of expertise in industries important to us (such as technology; life science/healthcare; energy and resource innovation; premium wine; and venture capital/private equity), functional expertise in areas such as banking/financial services, public companies, global markets, legal/compliance, regulatory, accounting, finance, operations, information technology and risk management, and an assessment of an individual’s abilities to work constructively with the other Board members and management.

Communications with the Board

Individuals who wish to communicate with our Board may do so by sending ane-mail to our Board at bod@svb.com. Any communications intended fornon-management directors should be sent to thee-mail address above to the attention of the Board Chairman. Board-related communications are reviewed by the ChairmanChairperson of the Board and shared with the full Board as appropriate.

Code of EthicsCODEOF ETHICS

We havemaintain a Code of Ethics for the Principal Executive Officer and Senior Financial Officers (the “Code of Ethics”) that applies to our CEO, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Accounting Officer and other senior members of the Finance staff. A copy of thisthe Code of Ethics is available on our website at www.svb.com under “About Us—Investor Relations—Corporate Governance,” or can be obtained without charge by any person requesting it. (The contents of the website are not incorporated herein by reference and the website address provided above and throughout this Proxy Statement is intended to be an inactive textual reference only.) To request a copy of our Code of Ethics, please contact: Kristi Gilbaugh,Corporate Secretary, SVB Financial Group, 3003 Tasman Drive, Santa Clara, California 95054, or by telephone(408) 654-7400.

We intend to disclose any waivers from, or changes to, our Code of Ethics by posting such information on our website. No waivers or substantive changes were made during fiscal year 2015.2017.

CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY

 

15We are committed to the communities where we operate through corporate giving, employee volunteering, workforce development and environmental sustainability programs. In addition to these programs, we finance affordable housing in the San Francisco Bay Area as part of our commitment to the Community Reinvestment Act. We recognize that understanding our efforts to improve environmental, social and governance practices is increasingly important to our stockholders, customers and associates and have included some highlights below to clarify our ongoing commitments in these areas.

LOGO     BOARD & CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Community Development –As a financial institution focused on supporting innovation and entrepreneurship, we have contributed to community development by collaborating with local organizations to offer lending solutions for small businesses in our communities, including collaborating with the Opportunity Fund, which provides microloans, along with education and support, to underserved small business owners, and partnering with Grameen America, which provides microloans and education tolow-income female entrepreneurs. In addition, we have contributed funds and provided lending support to affordable housing efforts, including those of the Housing Trust Silicon Valley and various developers of affordable housing forvery-low andlow-income families, seniors, veterans and formerly homeless individuals in the San Francisco Bay Area.

Environmental Sustainability –We have also invested in environmental sustainability both by implementing energy efficiencies internally that have significantly reduced carbon emissions and promoting sustainable practices in certain of our workplaces and by supporting companies that are developing energy and resource efficiency solutions.

Diversity and Inclusion –In addition to investing in the environmental and economic health of our communities, we have also focused on fostering diversity and promoting inclusion in the workplace through corporate-wide initiatives, including hosting trainings and workshops on unconscious bias, sponsoring leading conferences focused on professional development for women, and serving as founding partner and global sponsor to theBoardlist, a resource designed to help recruit women for corporate board positions.

For further information regarding our sustainability and social responsibility efforts, please see our website under “About Us— Living Our Values.”

17

LOGO

BOARD & CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Corporate Governance Principles


BOARD COMMITTEES

OurWe believe our Board has created a sound committee structure designed to help the Board carry out its responsibilities in an effective and efficient manner. ThereWhile the Board may form from time to time ad hoc or other special purpose committees, there are six (6) core standing Board committees: Audit, Compensation, Credit, Finance, Governance and Risk.

Committee Independence and Audit Committee Financial ExpertsCOMMITTEE INDEPENDENCEAND AUDIT COMMITTEE FINANCIAL EXPERTS

The Board has determined that each of the current members of the Audit Committee, Compensation Committee, Credit Committee, Governance Committee and Risk Committee are “independent” under Nasdaqwithin the meaning of applicable SEC rules, NASDAQ director independence standards and other applicable regulatory requirements.requirements, to the extent applicable.

In addition, the Board has determined that each of Messrs. Robinson and Dunbar and Ms. Krishnan are “audit committee financial experts,” as defined under SEC rules, and possess “financial sophistication,” as defined under the rules of Nasdaq.NASDAQ.

Committee GovernanceCOMMITTEE GOVERNANCE

Committee Charters

Each committee is governed by a charter that is approved by the Board, which sets forth each committee’s purpose and responsibilities. The Board reviews the committees’ charters, and each committee reviews its own charter, on at least an annual basis, to assess the charters’ content and sufficiency, with final approval of any proposed changes required by the full Board. The charters of each committee are available on our website, www.svb.com under “About Us—Investor Relations—Corporate Governance.” (The contents of the website are not incorporated herein by reference and the website address provided above and throughout this Proxy Statement is intended to be an inactive textual reference only.)

The charters provide that each committee hashave adequate resources and authority to discharge its responsibilities, including appropriate funding for the retention of external consultants or advisers, as itthe committee deems necessary or appropriate.

Annual Committee Evaluations

The Governance Committee, in coordination with the Board, implements and develops a process to conduct an assessment ofassess committee performance and effectiveness. Typically, theThe assessments are conducted on an annual basis, and include a self-assessment by each committee. The review includes an evaluation of various areas that may include committee sizes,size, composition, performance, coordination among committee composition, committee performance, committee coordinationmembers and among the standing committees, and involvement with one another and committee involvement of the full Board. The results of the committee performance assessments are reviewed by each committee, as well as by the Governance Committee, and discussed with the full Board.

Committee Chairpersons/Membership, Responsibilities and MeetingsCOMMITTEE CHAIRPERSONS/MEMBERSHIP, RESPONSIBILITIESAND MEETINGS

All committee chairpersons of our six standing committees are independent and appointed annually by the Board of Directors. Each chairperson presides over committee meetings; oversees meeting agendas; serves as liaison between the committee members and the Board, as well as between committee members and management; and works actively and closely with executive and senior management on all committee matters, as appropriate.

The committees meetEach committee meets regularly, at least on a quarterly basis. The committees, typically through their committee chairpersons, routinely report their activitiesactions to, and discuss their recommendations with, the full Board. In addition, certain committees periodically hold extended meetings dedicated to discussing key strategic matters or other business items, on a more in-depth basis, that are relevant or subject to the committee’s oversight responsibilities.

responsibilities on a morein-depth basis.

 

1618

LOGO

BOARD & CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Board Committees

LOGO     BOARD & CORPORATE GOVERNANCE


The names of the members and highlights of some of the key oversight responsibilities of the committeesBoard Committees are set forth below:

 

Audit Committee (9 meetings in 2015)

•   Our corporate accounting and financial reporting processes and the quality and integrity of our financial statements and reports.

•   The qualification, independence, engagement and performance of our independent auditors.

•   The performance of our internal auditing function, as well as other key functions, including information technology, security, legal and regulatory matters.

John Robinson, Chair

Dave Clapper

Roger Dunbar

Lata Krishnan

Kate MitchellMary Miller

Audit Committee(11 meetings in 2017)

•        Quality and integrity of our financial statements, including internal controls over
            financial reporting.

•        Independent auditor of the Company, including its qualification, independence,
            engagement, compensation and performance.

•        Internal audit function of the Company, as well as other key areas including
            information technology, security, litigation and regulatory enforcement matters.

 

Compensation Committee (10 meetings in 2015)

•   Our overall compensation strategies, plans, policies and programs.

•   The approval of executive and director compensation.

•   The assessment of compensation-related risks.

Kate Mitchell, Chair

Jeff Maggioncalda

John Robinson

Garen Staglin

Compensation Committee(8 meetings in 2017)

•        Overall compensation strategies, plans, policies and programs.

•        Executive and director compensation approval.

•        Compensation risk management, including annual compensation-related risk
            assessments.

��

Dave Clapper, Chair

John Clendening

Jeff Maggioncalda

Kate Mitchell

John Robinson

Credit Committee (5(6 meetings in 2015)2017)

 

•        The creditCredit and lending strategies, objectives and risks, primarily of the Company and the Bank.

•        The creditCredit risk management, of the Company and the Bank, including reviewing internal credit policies and establishing
            portfolio limits.

•        The qualityQuality and performance of the credit portfolio of the Company and the Bank.

Dave Clapper, Chairportfolio.

Jeff Maggioncalda

John Robinson

 

Finance Committee (9 meetings in 2015)

•   The financial risk management of the Company and the Bank.

•   The financial strategies and objectives of the Company and the Bank, including the capital planning, capital and liquidity management, and the annual budget.

•   The review of the Company and Bank’s financial performance and compliance with applicable financial regulatory requirements, including stress testing.

•   The review of certain corporate development matters, such as strategic investments.

Joel Friedman, Chair

Eric Benhamou

Roger Dunbar

Lata Krishnan

Mary Miller

Finance Committee(10 meetings in 2017)

•        Financial strategies, objectives and risks relating to capital and liquidity management,
            investments, derivative activities, and funds management.

•        Annual budget of the Company, and recommendation to the Board for approval.

•        Compliance with certain applicable financial regulatory requirements, including capital
            adequacy/planning and stress testing.

•        Material corporate development matters that may result in a significant financial
            impact.

 

Governance Committee (5 meetings in 2015)

•   Our general corporate governance practices, including review of our Corporate Governance Guidelines.

•   The annual performance evaluation process of our Board and its committees, and CEO.

•   The identification and nomination of director candidates.

•   Our regulatory compliance function of the Company and the Bank.

Eric Benhamou, Chair

Roger Dunbar

Joel Friedman

Garen Staglin

Governance Committee(6 meetings in 2017)

•        Corporate governance practices, including our Corporate Governance Guidelines.

•        Annual performance evaluation processes of our Board and its committees, and CEO.

•        Identification and nomination of director candidates.

•        Regulatory compliance function of the Company, including financial crimes risk
            management.

 

Risk Committee (4 meetings in 2015)

•   The enterprise-wide risk management policies of the Company.

•   The operation of our enterprise-wide risk management framework.

•   Our compliance with the Company’s risk appetite statement.

•   The review of changes to our risk profile.

Roger Dunbar, Chair

Eric Benhamou

Dave Clapper

Joel Friedman

Kate Mitchell

John Robinson

 

Risk Committee(5 meetings in 2017)

•        Enterprise-wide risk management policies of the Company.

•        Operation of our enterprise-wide risk management framework.

•        Risk appetite statement of the Company, including recommendations to the Board
            regarding any changes.

•        Overall risk profile of the Company.

 

1719

LOGO

BOARD & CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Board Committees

LOGO     BOARD & CORPORATE GOVERNANCE


REPORT OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE OF THE BOARDREPORT

The Report of the Audit Committee of the Board shall not be deemed incorporated by reference by any general statement incorporating by reference this Proxy Statement into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Act”Act), or under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”Exchange Act), except to the extent that we specifically incorporate the information contained in the report by reference, and shall not otherwise be deemed filed under such acts.

Our Audit Committee has prepared the following report for inclusion in this Proxy Statement. The Audit Committee is governed by a Board-adopted charter, a copy of which is available on our website at www.svb.com.www.svb.com. The charter specifies, among other things, the scope of the committee’s responsibilities and how those responsibilities are performed. All members of the Audit Committee are “independent” as defined by Nasdaq, ourNASDAQ and the requirements of the Exchange Act, and meet the applicable listing standard.heightened independence criteria under SEC rules. In addition, Messrs. Robinson and Dunbar and Ms. Krishnan meet the “audit committee financial expert” requirement as defined in RegulationS-Kunder SEC rules,the Exchange Act, and possess “financial sophistication,” as defined under the rules of Nasdaq.NASDAQ.

Responsibilities of the Audit Committee

The primary responsibility of the Audit Committee is to act on behalf of the Board in fulfilling the Board’s responsibility with respect to overseeing our accounting and reporting practices, and the quality and integrity of our financial statements and reports and our internal control over financial reporting. The committee is responsible for the appointment (or reappointment) and the compensation of our independent registered public accounting firm, as well as for the review of the qualifications, independence and performance of the registered public accounting firm engaged as our independent auditors. Specifically, in reappointing KPMG LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for 2018, the Audit Committee considered, among other factors: KPMG’s performance on prior audits; the quality, efficiency and cost of KPMG’s services; KPMG’s knowledge of the Company’s business and the banking industry; and KPMG’s overall relationship with the Audit Committee and management. (See “Other Proxy Proposals—Ratification of Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm—Principal Audit Fees and Services”for more information about the Audit Committee’s oversight of KPMG’s audit and permissiblenon-audit fees.)

In addition, the Audit Committee oversees our internal auditInternal Audit function, which is responsible for reviewing and evaluating the effectiveness of our internal controls, and also overseesas well as other management functions including information technology and security. To the extent applicable, the committee also oversees the Company’s material litigation matters, regulatory enforcement actions, and other legal proceedings.

The Audit Committee meets regularly in executive session with our independent auditor and our Head of Internal Audit (both separately and together), without other members of management present.as appropriate.

Responsibilities of Management, and Independent Auditor and Internal Audit

Management has the primary responsibility forover the Company’s financial statements and the reporting process, as well as for our internal controls. Our independent registered public accounting firm, KPMG, LLP, is responsible for expressing an opinion on the conformity of our audited financial statements with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, as well as an opinion on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting in accordance with the requirements promulgated by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (the “PCAOB”). KPMG LLP has served as our independent auditor since 1994.

Our Head of Internal Audit reports directly to the Audit Committee (and administratively to the CEO). Under his direction, our Internal Audit function is responsible for preparing an annual audit plan and conducting internal audits intended to evaluate the Company’s internal control structure and compliance with applicable regulatory requirements.

Financial Reporting for 20152017

The Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed with management its assessment and report on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2015,2017, which it made using the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in “Internal Control Integrated Framework (2013).” The committee also has reviewed and discussed with KPMG LLP its review and report on our internal control over financial reporting.

20

LOGO

BOARD & CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Board Committees


(Report of the Audit Committee of the Board continued)

Moreover, the Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed with management and the independent auditors the audited consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2015.2017. The Audit Committee discussed with the independent auditorsauditor the matters required to be discussed by PCAOB Auditing Standard No. 16,1301,Communications with Audit Committees. In addition, the Audit Committee received from the independent auditors the written disclosures and the letter required by applicable requirements of the PCAOB regarding the independent accountant’s communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence, including Rule 3526,Communication with Audit Committees Concerning Independence, and has discussed with the independent auditorsauditor the auditors’auditor’s independence from us and our management.

In reliance on the reviews and discussions referred to above, the Audit Committee recommended to our Board of Directors that the audited financial statements be included in our Annual Report onForm 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015,2017, for filing with the SEC.

This report is included herein at the direction of the members of the Audit Committee.

AUDIT COMMITTEE

John Robinson (Chair)

David Clapper

Roger Dunbar

Lata Krishnan

Kate Mitchell

John Robinson

(Chair)

David ClapperRoger DunbarLata KrishnanMary Miller

 



18

LOGO     BOARD & CORPORATE GOVERNANCE


COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT

This Compensation Committee Report shall not be deemed incorporated by reference by any general statement incorporating by reference this Proxy Statement into any filing under the Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that we specifically incorporate the information contained in the report by reference, and shall not otherwise be deemed filed under such acts.

The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed with management the Compensation Discussion and Analysis set forth in this Proxy Statement. Based on this review and these discussions, the Compensation Committee recommended to our Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in our Annual Report on Form10-K for the year ended December 31, 20152017 and this Proxy Statement.

This report is included herein at the direction of the members of the Compensation Committee.

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE

Kate Mitchell (Chair)

Jeff Maggioncalda

John Robinson

Garen Staglin



(Chair)

Jeff MaggioncaldaJohn RobinsonGaren Staglin

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider ParticipationCOMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION

During 2015,2017, the Compensation Committee (or the 162(m) Committee of the Board) performed all compensationexecutive compensation-related functions of the Board, except for the approval of CEO compensation, which was approved by the independent members of the Board based on the Compensation Committee’s recommendation. (SeeSee discussion above under“Board Committees – Committees—Committee Chairpersons/Membership, Responsibilities and Meetings”for additional information on the Compensation Committee.) Mr. Becker does not participate in any of the Board or Compensation Committee discussions related to the evaluation of his performance or the recommendation/recommendation or determination of his compensation. See descriptions of related transactions between us and each of the members of the Compensation Committee, if any, under “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions” below.

None of the members of the Compensation Committee has ever been one of our officers or employees and none of our executive officers serves, or in the past fiscal year served, as a member of the board of directors or compensation committee of any entity that has one or more of its executive officers serving on our Board.

 

1921

LOGO

BOARD & CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Board Committees

LOGO     BOARD & CORPORATE GOVERNANCE


COMPENSATION FOR DIRECTORS

OVERVIEW

Our compensation for ournon-employee directors is designed to be competitive with other financial institutions that are similar in size, complexities or business models. In addition, our director compensation is designed to be tied to business performance and stockholder returns, and to align director and stockholder interests through director ownership of the Company’s stock.

The following table sets forthCompensation Committee oversees and approves our director compensation. In doing so, the amounts earned or paidCompensation Committee reports to each non-employee memberand, as appropriate, consults with, the full Board on all relevant matters. Our CEO, the only employee director on the Board, does not receive any payment for his services as a director.

Determination of our Board of Directors during the year ended December 31, 2015.Director Compensation

 

Overview

 

Our compensation for our non-employee
directors is designed to be competitive with
other financial institutions that are similar in
size, complexities and/or business models. In
addition, our director compensation is designed
to be tied to business performance and
stockholder returns, and to align director and
stockholder interests through director
ownership of the Company’s stock.

 

The Compensation Committee oversees
and approves our director compensation and
reports to, and consults with as appropriate, the
full Board on all relevant matters. While the
committee reviews our director compensation
structure on a regular basis, there were no
material changes made in 2015.

 

Our CEO, the only employee director on
the Board, does not receive any payment for
services as a director.

 

Name

 Fees
Earned or
Paid in Cash
  Stock
Awards
($) (1)
  Total 
 

Roger F. Dunbar

 $  192,500   $  200,007   $  392,507   
 

Eric A. Benhamou

  83,250    100,004    183,254   
 

David M. Clapper

  86,250    100,004    186,254   
 

Joel P. Friedman

  84,000    100,004    184,004   
 

C. Richard Kramlich (2)

  67,500    100,004    167,504   
 

Lata Krishnan

  71,500    100,004    171,504   
 

Jeffrey N. Maggioncalda

  70,750    100,004    170,754   
 

Mary J. Miller (3)

  51,750    100,004    151,754   
 

Kate D. Mitchell

  94,000    100,004    194,004   
 

John F. Robinson

  112,250    100,004    212,254   
 

Garen K. Staglin

  65,250    100,004    165,254   
 

 

(1)  Values indicated for annual director equity grants reflect the fair value of awards made during the fiscal year for the 2015-2016 term. Such values were computed in accordance with the Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718. The actual value realized is subject to our stock price performance on the date of release.

(2)  Mr. Kramlich retired from the Board of Directors effective as of December 31, 2015 and transitioned to an advisory director position.

(3)  Ms. Miller joined the Board of Directors as of May 12, 2015.

 

        

      

     

Each year, the Compensation Committee, together with its independent compensation consultant, conducts a comprehensive review of director compensation, taking into consideration our overall compensation philosophy, as well as competitive compensation data from the Company’s Peer Group for the applicable year and other relevant and comparable market data and trends. The committee reviews, on at least an annual basis, each of the various pay components, the form and amount of payment, as well as the cash/equity compensation mix. Based on such review and any recommendations from its independent compensation consultant, the Compensation Committee may make changes to director compensation to the extent it deems appropriate. No changes to director compensation were made in 2017.

Elements of Director Compensation

Compensation for ournon-employee directors reflects a combination of cash (annual retainer fees and committee meeting fees) and equity (annual restricted stock unit awards). Consistent with 2014, the components of our non-employee director compensation for 2015 were as follows:

Annual Director Retainer Fee

$35,000

Annual Chairperson Fee

$90,000, Board Chair

$20,000, Audit Committee Chair

$15,000, Compensation Committee and Risk Committee Chairs

$12,000, all other committee chairs

Board Meeting Fees

$1,000 (in-person)/$500 (telephonic)

$3,000 per day, for extended strategic planning meetings

Committee Meeting Fees

$2,500 (in-person)/$1,250 (telephonic), Audit Committee

$1,500 (in-person)/$750 (telephonic), all other committees

$5,000 per day, for extended Audit Committee strategic planning meetings

$3,000 per day, for extended strategic planning meetings for all other committees

Annual Equity Retainer Award

Total grant value of approximately $200,000 and $100,000 for the Board Chair and each of the other non-employee directors, respectively; form of restricted stock units, subject to annual vesting.

The members of the BoardDirectors are also eligible for reimbursement for their reasonable expenses incurred in connection with attendance at meetings or the performance of their director duties in accordance with Company policy.

Schedule of Director Fees

Annual Director Retainer Fee$60,000
Annual Chairperson Fee

$90,000, Board Chair

$20,000, Audit Committee Chair

$15,000, Compensation Committee and Risk Committee Chairs

$12,000, Credit, Finance and Governance Chairs

Committee Meeting Fees

$2,500(in-person)/$1,250 (telephonic), Audit Committee

$1,500(in-person)/$750 (telephonic), all other committees

$5,000 per day, for Audit Committee strategic planning or other extended meetings

$3,000 per day, for strategic planning or other extended meetings for all other committees

Annual Equity Retainer Award

Grant of restricted stock units subject to annual vesting with a total value of approximately $200,000 and $100,000 for the Board Chair and each of the othernon-employee directors, respectively.

 

2017 Director Compensation

 

 

The following table sets forth the amounts earned or paid to eachnon-employee member of our Board of Directors during the year ended December 31, 2017.

 

 

       Name Fees Earned
or Paid in
Cash
  Stock Awards
($) (1)
  Total 

       Roger F. Dunbar

  $        210,750   $        200,154           $        410,904 

       Eric A. Benhamou

  97,500   100,077           197,577 

       David M. Clapper

  104,750   100,077           204,827 

       John S. Clendening(2)

  51,640   73,151           124,791 

       Joel P. Friedman

  98,250   100,077           198,327 

       Lata Krishnan

  85,500   100,077           185,577 

       Jeffrey N. Maggioncalda

  77,250   100,077           177,327 

       Mary J. Miller

  91,500   100,077           191,577 

       Kate D. Mitchell

  98,250   100,077           198,327 

       John F. Robinson

  125,000   100,077           225,077 

       Garen K. Staglin

  75,750   100,077           175,827 

                                                           

 

(1)  Values indicated for annual director equity awards reflect the fair value of restricted stock units at the time of grant for the fiscal year for the 2017-2018 term. The actual value realized is subject to our stock price performance on the date of settlement.

(2)  Mr. Clendening joined the Board in August 2017; represents a prorated annual equity award.

 

   

   

 

2022

LOGO

BOARD & CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Director Compensation

LOGO     BOARD & CORPORATE GOVERNANCE


Director Equity Compensation; Deferral Elections

Our annual equity retainer awards are typically granted to directors in the form of restricted stock units. The awards are approved by the Compensation Committee and are granted approximately one month after the Company’s annual meeting of stockholders (typically the following month), andstockholders. The awards vest in full upon the completion of the annual director term on the date of the next annual meeting. In 2015,2017, the directors were granted an aggregate total of 8,8446,508 restricted stock units with a scheduled vesting date of April 21, 2016.the upcoming Annual Meeting.

Non-employee directors may elect an irrevocable deferral of the receiptsettlement of restricted stock unit awards until the earliest of: (a)(i) a specific future settlement date that meets the requirements of Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code 409A, (b)of 1986, as amended, (ii) separation from service, (c)(iii) the date of a change in control, (d)(iv) death or (e)(v) the date of disability. Elections will apply to restricted stock unit awards received during 2015. Ms.Mdmes. Krishnan and Ms. Mitchell elected to defer the receiptsettlement of their 20152017 equity grants of 737561 restricted stock units each.

Equity Plan Limits Applicable to Directors

Equity grants to directors are subject to the terms of our 2006 Equity Incentive Plan, as amended, including the following limitations (as provided under the plan):

 

Nonon-employee director may be granted, in any fiscal year, awards covering shares having an initial value greater than $500,000.

 

Annual director grants of full value equity awards may become fully vested no earlier than the last day of the director’s then current annual term of service, subject to certain limited exceptions as provided under the plan.

Determination of Director CompensationDIRECTOR EQUITY OWNERSHIP GUIDELINES

Each year, the Compensation Committee, together with its independent compensation consultant, conducts a comprehensive review of director compensation, taking into consideration our overall compensation philosophy, as well as competitive compensation data from the Company’s 2015 Peer Group and other relevant and comparable market data and trends. The committee routinely reviews each of the various pay components, the form and amount of payment, as well as the cash/equity compensation mix. Based on such review and any recommendations from its independent compensation consultant, the Compensation Committee will make changes to the extent it deems appropriate.

Director Equity Ownership Guidelines

Under the current equity ownership guidelines for ournon-employee directors, eachnon-employee member of the Board of Directors is expected to hold, within five years of becoming a director, shares of our Common Stock that have a minimum value equivalent to 600% of his or her annual retainer fee.

The Compensation Committee is responsible for setting and periodically reviewing the equity ownership guidelines. Equity ownership requirements for directors are established based upon a competitive review and subsequent recommendations by the committee’s independent compensation consultant. The Governance Committee is responsible for overseeing director compliance with these guidelines, and reviews directors’ holdings on a quarterly basis. Any exceptions to meeting the guidelines due to personal financial or other reasons are reviewed and determined by the Governance Committee.

As of December 31, 2015,2017, allnon-employee directors were in compliance withhad attained the applicable ownership guidelines.

requirements or otherwise remained on target to meet such requirements within the established compliance time frame.

 

2123

LOGO

BOARD & CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Director Compensation

LOGO     BOARD & CORPORATE GOVERNANCE


CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS

Related Party Transactions PolicyRELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS POLICY

Our policy on related party transactions (“Related Party Policy”) governs the transactions involving us and certain related persons that are required to be disclosed under Item 404 of SEC Regulation S-K (“S-K 404”).S-K. We regularly monitor our business dealings and those of our directors and executive officers, as appropriate, to determine whether any such dealings would constitute a related party transaction under the Related Party Policy. Generally, under the policy, any transaction, arrangement or relationship will be considered an interested transaction subject to the review and/or approval of the Audit Committee, if: (i) we are a participant in the transaction; (ii) the aggregate transaction amount involved will or may be expected to exceed $120,000 in any calendar year; and (iii) a related person or party has or will have a direct or indirect material interest in the transaction. (Transactions not required to be disclosed under S-K 404 are excluded from this policy.) Moreover, any of theThe following persons isare considered a related personRelated Parties under the Related Party Policy: (i) any director or executive officer of the Company; (ii) any nominee for director of the Company; (iii) any holder of more than 5% of our Common Stock; and (iv) any immediate family member of any of the above.

We have implemented a framework to help identify potential related party transactions, which may include from time to time, loan transactions by the Company or the Bank, investment transactions, compensation arrangements, or other business transactions involving us or our subsidiaries. Under this framework, we have processes in place that are designed to identify, review and escalate, as appropriate, proposed transactions involving a potential party related to the Company. In addition, employeesRelated Party. Employees are also expected to escalate any transaction involving potential conflicts of interests pursuant to our Code of Conduct.

The Audit Committee has primary responsibility for reviewing these transactions for potential conflicts of interestsinterest and approving them (or denying approval, as the case may be). Under the Related Party Policy, the Audit Committee’s approval may be granted in advance, ratified or based on certain standing approvals previously authorized by resolution. The Audit Committee may delegate its approval authority under the Related Party Policy to the committee chairperson. Additionally, the Credit Committee reviews and approves certain related party loan transactions as described below, and the Governance Committee takes into consideration related party transactions involving our directors as part of its annual director independence review.

Insider Loan PolicyINSIDER LOAN POLICY

We also have in place a policy whichthat permits the Bank to make loans (“Insider Loans”) to directors, executive officers and principal stockholders of the Bank or its affiliates (“Insiders”) and the related interests of those Insiders (“Insider LoansInsiders”), pursuant to the applicable requirements of Regulation O of the Federal Reserve Act (“Regulation O”). Moreover, Insider Loans qualify for an exemption from Section 402 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as they are made by the Bank and subject to Regulation O.

Pursuant to Regulation O, theour Insider Loan policy authorizes the Bank to make Insider Loans if such Insider Loans: (a)(i) are approved in advance by a majority of the Board of Directors of the Bank, for Insider Loans whereif the aggregate amount of all outstanding extensions of credit to the Insider and to all related interests of the Insider exceeds $500,000; (b)(ii) are extended under substantially the same terms and conditions and rates as those prevailing at the time of the Insider Loan for comparable transactions withnon-Insider Bank clients; and (c)(iii) do not have more than a normal risk of failure of repayment to the Bank or other unfavorable features. The Insider whose credit extension is subject to Board approval mustmay not participate either directly or indirectly in the voting to approve such extension of credit.

Related Party TransactionsRELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

Ordinary Course Loan Transactions

During 2015,Except as described below, during 2017 the Bank made loans to related parties,Related Parties, including certain companies in which certain of our directors or their affiliated venture funds are beneficial owners of ten percent10% or more of the equity securities of such companies. Such loans: (a)companies, that were made(i) in the ordinary course of business; (b) were madebusiness, (ii) on substantially the same terms, including interest rates and collateral, as those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with other persons;persons, and (c) did(iii) not involveinvolving more than the normal risk of collectability or present other unfavorable features.

Prior to their respective appointments as executive officers, each of John China and Philip Cox received a mortgage loan through the Bank’s

24

LOGO

BOARD & CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Related Transactions


Employee Matters

SVB also maintains an Employee Home Ownership Program (“EHOP”), an employeea benefit program wherebythat allows eligiblenon-executive employees of the Bank and its affiliates to receive preferential terms on mortgage loans.loans at preferred rates. Generally, executive officers may not participate in the EHOP unless they have received a loan prior to their appointment as executive officers, as was the case for Mr. China’sPhil Cox. In September 2011, Mr. Cox received an EHOP mortgage loanin the amount of approximately $311,000, which was $1,176,000, withfully repaid on September 19, 2017.

We also maintain a principal balanceseries of $1,014,689employee-funded investment funds known as of December 31, 2015. Mr. China’s loan matures April 1, 2016. Mr. Cox’s EHOP mortgage loan amount was $310,553, with a principal balance of $262,918 as of December 31, 2015. Mr. Cox’s loan matures October 1, 2018.

22

LOGO     BOARD & CORPORATE GOVERNANCE


Employee Funds

In 2015, we formed Qualified Investors Fund IV, LLCFunds (“QIF IVQIFs”), a $5.3 million employee-funded investment fund. Participating employees must meet certain eligibility requirements pursuant to applicable regulatory requirements. QIF IV investswhich invest employees’ own capital in certain funds, including certain SVB Capital funds. We do not charge a management fee on QIF IV, but pass on the cost of external expenses to the QIF IV participants. The following executive officersparticipants and do not charge a management fee. Participating employees must meet certain eligibility qualifications pursuant to applicable regulatory requirements. Messrs. Beck, Becker, Cadieux, China, Cox, Descheneaux, Dreyer, Leone and Zuckert and Mdme. Draper have each made a commitmentcommitments to QIF IVQIFs in commitment amounts ranging from $50 thousand$50,000 to $250 thousand: Greg Becker, John China, Philip Cox, Michael Descheneaux, Michelle Draper, Joan Parsons, Bruce Wallace and Michael Zuckert.$1,025,000.

OtherVendor Arrangements

Total compensationIn July 2017, Cachematrix, a cash management platform provider for 2015 for Jon Wolter,the Bank’s Cash Sweep Program, was acquired by BlackRock, Inc., which, together with its affiliates, is a vice presidentgreater than 5% owner of our outstanding voting securities. In 2017, we paid fees totaling approximately $770,000 to Cachematrix. Additionally, we offer certain BlackRock investment funds, among other third party investment funds, under our Cash Sweep Program. Client investments in the BankCash Sweep Program are initiated and directed by clients themselves.

In addition, we have engaged The Vanguard Group, which, together with its affiliates, is a greater than 5% owner of our outstanding securities, as the son-in-lawrecord-keeper and trustee of Joan Parsons, wasour 401(k) and Employee Stock Ownership Plan, as well as the record-keeper of our Deferred Compensation Plan. We paid The Vanguard Group a fee of approximately $144,000 (including his base salary, bonuses, company contributions$215,000 relating to his 401(k)/ESOP account, but excluding other normal benefits provided to all employees). His compensation isservices rendered in accordance with our standard employment and compensation practices applicable to employees with equivalent qualifications and responsibilities as those holding similar positions. Ms. Parsons has no management oversight responsibility over Mr. Wolter, nor is she involved with any decisions concerning his compensation.2017.

SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE

We believe, based on a review of Forms 3, 4 and 5 and amendments thereto filed with the SEC and other information known to us, that during fiscal year 20152017 our directors, officers (as defined in the rules under Section 16 of the Exchange Act), and any greater than 10% stockholders have complied with all Section 16(a) filing requirements in a timely manner; except for one late report relating to the disposition of shares held in the 401(k) account of our executive officer, Marc Verissimo, in November 2015 due to an inadvertent administrative error.

manner.

 

2325

LOGO

BOARD & CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Section 16(a) Compliance

LOGO     BOARD & CORPORATE GOVERNANCE


  EXECUTIVE OFFICERSAND COMPENSATION

INFORMATION ON EXECUTIVE OFFICERSInformation on Executive Officers

Our executive officers perform policy-making functions for us within the meaning of applicable SEC rules. They may also serve as officers of the Bank and/or our other subsidiaries. There are no family relationships among our directors or executive officers.

The following information outlines the name and age of each of our executive officers, (asas of the date of this Proxy Statement)Statement, and his or her principal occupation with the Company, followed by biographical information of each such executive officer:

 

Name

 

Age

  

Principal Occupation

Greg W. Becker

 4850  President and Chief Executive Officer

Dan J. Beck

45Chief Financial Officer

Marc C. Cadieux

 4951  Chief Credit Officer

John D. China

 5052  Head of RelationshipTechnology Banking

Philip C. Cox

 4951  Head EMEA and President of the UK Branch

Michael R. Descheneaux

 4850  President, Silicon Valley Bank
Chief Financial Officer

Michelle A. Draper

 4850  Chief Marketing Officer

Michael L. Dreyer

 5254  Chief Operations Officer

Christopher D. Edmonds-Waters

 5355  Head ofChief Human Resources Officer

Laura H. Izurieta

57Chief Risk Officer

Roger E. Leone

 6264  Chief Information Officer

Joan S. Parsons

57Head of Specialty Banking

Marc J. Verissimo

60Chief Risk Officer

Bruce E. Wallace

51Chief Digital Officer

Michael S. Zuckert

 5759  General Counsel

EXECUTIVE BIOGRAPHIES

 

Executive Biographies

Greg W. Becker’sbiography can be found under “Proposal No. 1—Election of Directors” above.

Dan J. Beck,Chief Financial Officer,is responsible for our finance, treasury and accounting functions. Before joining the Company in 2017, Mr. Beck served as the Chief Financial Officer for Bank of the West, a subsidiary of BNP Paribas Group, from June 2015 to May 2017 and as Executive Vice President and Corporate Controller from June 2008 to June 2015. Prior to his tenure at Bank of the West, Mr. Beck held various finance and accounting roles with Wells Fargo Bank, the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation, E*TRADE Financial Corporation and Deloitte & Touche LLP. Mr. Beck holds a B.S. in Accounting from Virginia Commonwealth University and a B.S. in Biology from Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University.

 

 

Marc C. Cadieux,Chief Credit Officer, oversees our credit administration function. Mr. Cadieux joined us in 1992 as Assistant Vice President and has held a variety of positions of increasing responsibility in the areas of credit administration, business development and relationship management during his tenure with us, includingthe Company. Mr. Cadieux was previously the Division Risk Manager for the Company’sSVB’s Eastern Division, where he was responsible for overseeing our commercial lending activities in the eastern United States, Canada, the United Kingdom and Israel. Mr. Cadieux was appointed as Assistant Chief Credit Officer in 2009 and was later appointed as Chief Credit Officer in 2013, where he currently oversees our credit administration function.2013. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Cadieux held several credit-related positions with Pacific Western Bank and Bank of New England. Mr. Cadieux holds a Bachelor’s degree in Economics from Colby College.

Other Prior

Loan Workout Officer, Pacific Western Bank (1990-1992)

Experience:

Various credit positions with Bank of New England (1988-1990)

Education/ Other:

Bachelor’s degree in Economics from Colby College

 

 

 

26

LOGO

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS & COMPENSATION

Information on Executive Officers

 

24

LOGO     EXECUTIVE OFFICERS & COMPENSATION


John D. China,Head of Technology Banking, oversees the growth of our technology banking business. Mr. China joined us in 1996 as Senior Relationship Manager and has since held a variety of positions with the Company, including Head of Venture Capital GroupManagement and Head of Venture Capital and Private Equity Group.division. Mr. China was appointed as the Head of Relationship Management in 2010. In 2014, Mr. China was appointed the2010, Head of Relationship Banking where hein 2014, and Head of Technology Banking in 2017. Mr. China is a member of the boards of H2, a digital industry leadership network, and BUILD, a nonprofit organization dedicated to educating under-resourced youth through entrepreneurship; and the advisory boards of Alpha Club, a networking community of founders, CEOs and technology influencers, and York Butter Factory, an Australian coworking and startup incubator space. Mr. China holds a Bachelor’s degree in Industrial Engineering from Stanford University.

Philip C. Cox,Head of Europe, Middle East and Africa; President of the UK Branch, is focused on the international development of our business and is responsible for overseeing all aspects of our relationships within the venture capital and private equity, private bank and commercial bank communities.

Other Experience:

Director, California Israel Chamber of Commerce, a non-profit organization dedicated to strengthening business and trade relations between California and Israel (since 2011)

Advisory Board Member, DEMO, an organization dedicated to emerging technology development (since 2010)

Director, Astia.org, a not-for-profit organization dedicated to the success of women-led, high-growth ventures (since 2009)

Advisory Council, Advancing Science in America, a non-profit organization dedicated to advancing science and technology in the United States (since 2013)

Other Prior Experience:

Director, Executive Council of New York City, a global community of senior executives (2001-2003)

Education/ Other:

Bachelor’s degree in Industrial Engineering from Stanford University

Philip C.UK branch. Mr. Cox joined us in 2009 as Head of UK, Europe & Israel, where he was responsible for the overall strategic direction of the Company in the UK, Europe and Israel, as well as the establishment of our UK Branch banking business. Hebusiness, prior to his appointment to his current role in 2012. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Cox was appointed as Head of Europe, Middle EastCommercial Banking at the Bank of Scotland in London, a division of Lloyds Banking Group (2008-2009) and Africa (“EMEA”)the Chief Executive Officer of Torex Retail PLC (2005-2008). Prior to his tenure at Torex Retail PLC, Mr. Cox spent approximately 23 years with NatWest/RBS Group in a variety of positions, including Managing Director of Transport and PresidentInfrastructure Finance, Regional Managing Director of the UK Branch in 2012, where heNorth of England Region and the same position for the South West and Wales business. Mr. Cox is focused ona member of the international developmentChartered Institute of our businessBankers (UK) and is responsible for our UK branch.the Association of Corporate Treasurers (UK).

Prior Directorships:

Entrepreneur First, an organization devoted to developing high-growth tech startups in London (2011-2014)

Other Prior

Head of Commercial Banking, Bank of Scotland (2008-2009)

Experience:

Chief Executive Officer, European Business, Torex Retail PLC, a manufacturing and industrial software company (2005-2008)

Education/

Associate of the Association of Corporate Treasurers, UK

Other:

Member of the Chartered Institute of Bankers, UK

 

 

Michael R. Descheneaux,President, Silicon Valley Bank,oversees the Company’s global commercial bank, private bank and funds management businesses, as well as credit administration. Mr. Descheneaux joined us in 2006 as Managing Director of Accounting and Financial Reporting, and was appointed as Chief Financial Officer in 2007, where he iswas responsible for all our finance, treasury, accounting and legal functions, as well as our funds management business. He also plays a keybusiness until he assumed his current role in our global strategy2017. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Descheneaux was a managing director of Navigant Consulting (2004 – 2006) and growth.

Private

Director, SPD Silicon Valley Bank, our joint venture bank in China (2012-2014; since 2015)

Directorships:

Other Prior

Managing Director, Navigant Consulting, a business consulting firm (2004-2006)

Experience:

Independent consultant (2002-2004)

Variousheld various leadership positions with Arthur Andersen for the Central and Eastern Europe Region (1995-2002)

¡

Lead Partner of financial services practice

¡

Lead audit partner of telecommunications/high-tech practice

Technical expert on U.S. GAAP and generally accepted auditing standards matters

Education/ Other:

Bachelor’s degree in Business Administration from Texas A&M University

Certified(1995 – 2002). Mr. Descheneaux holds a Bachelor’s degree in Business Administration from Texas A&M University. He is also a certified public accountant,

Member as well as a member of the Texas State Board of Public Accountancy and the American Institute of Certified Public AccountantsAccountancy.

 

 

25

LOGO     EXECUTIVE OFFICERS & COMPENSATION


Michelle A. Draper, joined us in 2013 as Chief Marketing Officer where she, is responsible for the strategy and execution of our global marketing initiatives. Prior to joining us she wasin 2013, Ms. Draper held various senior-level marketing positions at Charles Schwab & Co. from 1992 - 2013, including as Senior Vice President of Institutional Services Marketing, atwhere she oversaw advertising, brand management and other key marketing strategies. Prior to that, Ms. Draper also served as a director of Investor Services Segment Marketing and Vice President of Advisor Services Marketing Programs, developing marketing strategies for both the retail and institutional sides of the Charles Schwab & Co.

Other Prior Experience:

Various senior-level marketing positions at Charles Schwab & Co., overseeing advertising, brand marketing and other key marketing strategies (1992-2013)

Education/ Other:

Bachelor’s degree in Journalism from California Polytechnic State University – San Luis Obispo

business. Ms. Draper holds a Bachelor’s degree in Journalism from California Polytechnic State University – San Luis Obispo, as well as Series 7 General Securities Representative and Series 24 General Securities Principal Licenses

licenses.

 

 

Michael L. Dreyer, joined us in 2015 as Chief Operations Officer where he, is responsible for the Company’s global technology and infrastructure functions. Most recently, hePrior to joining us in 2015, Mr. Dreyer served as the Chief Operations Officer and President of the Americas for Monitise, where he was responsible for the design, build and operations of itsMonitise’s technology globally, as well as its Americas business (2014 - 2015). Prior to that, Mr. Dreyer was the Chief Information Officer at Visa Inc., where he was responsible for company’s systems and the company’s Americas business.

Public

Finisar Corporation, a supplier of optical communication products (since 2015)

Directorships:

F5 Networks Inc., a provider of application delivery services (since 2012)

Other Prior

Chief Operations Officer and President of the Americas at Monitise (2014-2015)

Experience:

Chief Information Officer (2005-2014);technology platforms (1998 - 2014). Mr. Dreyer has also held various senior level positions at Visa Inc. (1988-2005)

Various senior-level positions at American Express, (1995-1998)

Various senior-level positions at Prime Financial, Inc. (1992-1995)

Various senior-level positions at, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) (1990-1992)

Various senior-level positions atand Bank of America (1989-1990)

Education/ Other:

Bachelor’s degree in Psychology from Washington State University

America. He has been on the board of directors of Finisar Corporation since 2015, and F5 Networks Inc., since 2012. Mr. Dreyer holds a Bachelor’s degree in Psychology and a Master’s degree in Business Administration from Washington State UniversityUniversity.

 

 

Christopher D. Edmonds-Waters, joined us in 2003 as Director of Organization Effectiveness, and in 2007, was appointed to his current role as Head ofChief Human Resources where heOfficer, oversees our human resources function, which includes our compensation, global mobility, recruiting and learning and development functions. Mr. Edmonds-Waters joined us in 2003 as Director of Organization Effectiveness and was appointed to his current role in 2007. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Edmonds-Waters held various senior-level human resources positions at Charles Schwab & Co. from 1996 – 2003 and began

 

27

Other Prior Experience:

LOGO  Various senior-level positions at Charles Schwab

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS & Co. (1996-2003), launching the company’s online training systemCOMPENSATION

Information on Executive Officers


Various leadership roles withhis career at Macy’s California managing corporate training programswhere he held various merchandising as well human resources roles. Mr. Edmonds-Waters holds a Bachelor’s degree in Intercultural Communications from Arizona State University and a Master’s degree in Human Resources and Organization Development from the University of San Francisco.

Education/

Bachelor’s degree in Intercultural Communications from Arizona State University

Other:

Master’s degree in Human Resources and Organization Development from the University of San Francisco

 

 

Laura H. Izurieta,Chief Risk Officer,is responsible for leading our enterprise-wide risk management, corporate compliance and regulatory functions. From 2000 until joining the Company in 2016, Ms. Izurieta held various roles of increasing responsibility at Capital One, including Vice President of Corporate Reputation and Governance, Vice President of Capital One Home Loans and Vice President of Information Technology, and most recently as the Executive Vice President and Chief Risk Officer, Retail and Direct Bank. Prior to her tenure at Capital One, Ms. Izurieta also held positions at Freddie Mac and Bank of America. Ms. Izurieta holds a Bachelor’s degree in Business Administration from Towson University and a Master’s degree in Applied Behavioral Science from John Hopkins School of Business.

Roger E. Leone, joined us in 2015Chief Information Officer, oversees our information technology function and previously served as Head of IT Infrastructure Engineering and Operations, and in September 2015, was appointed to his current role as Chief Information Officer, where he oversees our information technology functions.Operations. Prior to joining us in 2015, he served in a wide range of technology positions, including within the financial services industry.as an independent consultant from (2011-2014) and Vice President, Global IT Services at Yahoo! (2010-2011). Prior to joining us, hethat, Mr. Leone held seniorvarious senior-level IT leadership rolespositions at Pfizer (1996 – 2010), including as Vice President of Americas Regional Shared Services, where he managed a team of over 400 IT professionals supporting over 26,000 clients in the Americas.

Other Prior Experience:

Independent consultant (2011-2014)

Vice President Global IT Services at Yahoo! (2010-2011)

Various senior-level positions Prior to his time at Pfizer, (1996-2010)

Various senior-level positions atMr. Leone spent approximately 20 years with Bank of America (1976-1996)

Education/

Bachelor’s degree in Mathematics from Utica College of Syracuse University

Other:

26

LOGO     EXECUTIVE OFFICERS & COMPENSATION


Joan S. Parsons joined us in 1994 and has served in a variety of leadership positions throughout the Company, including Eastern Division Manager and Chief Banking Officer. Ms. Parsons was appointed HeadIT positions. Mr. Leone holds a Bachelor’s degree in Mathematics from Utica College of U.S. Banking in 2008, and was appointed Head of Specialty Banking in 2014, where she is responsible for all specialty debt products; sponsor finance, mezzanine finance, life science and healthcare, and energy and resource innovation banking practices; loan syndications, SVB Investment Services and SVB Analytics.

Private

Director, StartUp Institute, Inc. (since 2014)

Directorships:

Director, Leukemia & Lymphoma Society (since 2011)

Director, Planstrong Investment Management (since 2005)

Other Prior

Vice President of Corporate Banking, Fleet Bank of Massachusetts (1992-1994)

Experience:

Vice President, Barclays Bank PLC (1984-1992)

Banking Officer, Mellon Bank (1981-1983)

Education/ Other:

Bachelor’s degree in Economics and Art History from Wheaton College

Syracuse University.

 

 

Marc J. Verissimo joined us in 1993 and has served in a variety of leadership positions throughout the Company, including Manager of our Corporate Finance Group and our Risk Management Group. Mr. Verissimo was named Chief Strategy Officer in 2002. He is currently the Chief Risk Officer, where he is responsible for overseeing our credit, enterprise-wide risk management, corporate compliance and security functions.

Prior Directorships:

Entrepreneurs Foundation, a non-profit organization dedicated to strengthening the ties between entrepreneurial companies in the Bay Area and the communities in which they operate and their employees reside (2005-2012)

High Street Partners, Inc., a cross-border finance and administrative services firm (2009-2010)

Education/

Bachelor’s degree in Agricultural Economics from the University of California, Davis

Other:

Master’s degree in Business Administration from Harvard University

Bruce E. Wallace joined us in 2008 as Head of Global Services, where he was responsible for our operations, product management, global transaction banking and service delivery. He was later appointed Chief Operations Officer in 2011, where he was responsible for leading all bank and non-bank operations and information technology services, and in 2015, was appointed to his current role as Chief Digital Officer, where he is responsible for the Company’s digital banking functions and the Company’s fee-based product businesses.

Prior Directorships:

Director, SPD Silicon Valley Bank, our joint venture bank in China (2012-2015)

Other Prior Experience:

Senior Vice President and Manager of Treasury Management Operations, Wells Fargo & Company (2005-2008)

Various senior management positions in banking operations, Wells Fargo & Company (1987-2005)

Education/ Other:

Bachelor’s degree in Accounting from California State University, Sacramento

27

LOGO     EXECUTIVE OFFICERS & COMPENSATION


Michael S. Zuckert, joined us in 2014 as General Counsel where he, is responsible for all our legal and government affair matters. Prior to joining us,the Company in 2014, he served in a wide range of legal positions within the financial services industry. Most recently, he served as Deputy General Counsel of Citigroup from 2009-2014,(2009-2014), where he served as general counsel for its the company’snon-core assets business, Citi Holdings, and also focused on mergers and acquisitions.

Private Directorships:

American Red Cross – Bay Area, a non-profit organization providing relief to those affected by disasters (since 2015)

Law Foundation of Silicon Valley, a non-profit organization providing free legal services Prior to Silicon Valley individuals in need (since 2015)

Other Prior

Various senior-level legal positions at Citigroup Inc. (2002-2014)

Experience:

Various senior-level positions at Morgan Stanley & Co. Inc. (2000-2002 and 1987-1999)

his time at Citigroup, Mr. Zuckert held various senior-level positions at Morgan Stanley & Co. Inc., and was Vice President and General Counsel at TheStreet.com, Inc., an online financial news provider (1999-2000)provider. Mr. Zuckert is a director of the Law Foundation of Silicon Valley and the Global EIR Coalition and a member of the leadership council of Tech:NYC. He holds Bachelor’s degrees in History and Law and Society from Brown University and a Juris Doctor from New York University School of Law.

Education/

Bachelor’s degree in History and Law and Society from Brown University

Other:

Juris Doctor degree from New York University School of Law

 

 

 

28

LOGO

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS & COMPENSATION

Information on Executive Officers

 

28

LOGO     EXECUTIVE OFFICERS & COMPENSATION


COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSISCompensation Discussion and Analysis

This Compensation Discussion and Analysis (“CD&A”) discusses our 20152017 executive compensation program, primarily as it relates to our five “named executive officers” listed below.(“NEOs”).

 

CD&A EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

NAMED EXECUTIVE

OFFICERS (“NEOs”)

•  Greg Becker

President and CEO

•  Michael Descheneaux

Chief Financial Officer

•  John China

Head of Relationship Banking

•  Joan Parsons

Head of Specialty Banking

•  Bruce Wallace

Chief Digital Officer

(Former Chief Operations Officer)

Our Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors (the “Compensation Committee”) has primary oversight over the design and execution of our executive compensation program. The key objectives of our program are to:

•      attract, incent and retain talented individuals to lead our corporate growth,

•      deliver sustained strong performance over the long term, and

•      focus on stockholder value.

While we did not make any material changes to the design of our 2015 executive compensation program, we continued to review and enhance our practices to align executive pay with our business objectives and stockholder interests, as further discussed in this CD&A. Moreover, we continued to base incentive compensation on company and individual performance without encouraging undue risk-taking.

The compensation paid to our executives for 2015 was commensurate with overall performance, as well as our strong performance relative to peers. Despite the continued low interest rate environment in 2015, we continued to deliver strong performance in 2015, focusing on our long-term global growth. (See “2015 Performance” section of the Summary Information section at the beginning of this Proxy Statement.)

PRIMARY EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION ELEMENTSFOR 2015 - SUMMARY

 

  Base
Salary
Incentive Compensation
Plan (ICP)

Performance-Based

Restricted Stock Units
(PRSUs)

Stock
Options

Restricted Stock Units

(RSUs)

Form

MESSAGEFROMTHE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE

We, as the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors (“Compensation Committee”), have the delegated responsibility of primary oversight over the design and execution of the Company’s executive compensation program. We did not make any material changes to the design of our executive compensation program for 2017, and remained consistent with our core compensation strategy and philosophy, taking into account the following key considerations in determining executive pay:

•  Performance - Setting challenging performance metrics aligned with our strategic business and growth objectives, as well as stockholder interests;

•  Risk - Establishing a compensation framework that incents consistent and sustainable long-term performance, but without encouraging undue risk-taking; and

•  Talent - Setting appropriate compensation to attract and retain the executive talent needed for our business.

We also considered the Company’s pace of growth and increasing business and regulatory complexities. Overall, we were pleased to see another year of strong performance delivered by the Company. Our pay decisions reflected that performance, as well as our continuing emphasis on our core banking business, operational infrastructure, risk management and financial performance. In 2018, we remain committed to setting the appropriate compensation framework to drive our long-term, sustainable global growth and other strategic objectives.

   

-------------------- Cash --------------------Kate Mitchell,Chair

 

 

 

------------------------------- Equity-------------------------------

Jeff Maggioncalda
John RobinsonGaren Staglin   

 

---- Fixed ----   EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION ELEMENTS AT-A-GLANCE

 

CASH COMPENSATION

 

 

-------------------------- Performance-Based -----------------------

----- Fixed*-----

Performance Timing

--------- Short-Term Emphasis ---------

----------------------- Long-Term Emphasis -----------------------

Measurement Period

Ongoing

1 Year

3 Years

4 Year VestingEQUITY COMPENSATION

 

       
Key Performance Metrics Applicable**---

Base Salary

 

Incentive Compensation

ROEPlan (ICP)

 (relative and budgeted)  

Performance-Based  Restricted
Stock Units (PRSUs)

Stock Options

Restricted Stock Units

(RSUs)

----------------- Short-Term Emphasis -----------------

 

 

 

Relative TSR; ROE;------------------------------------------- Long-Term Emphasis -------------------------------------------

Ongoing

1-Year

Performance Period

3-Year

Performance Period

4-Year

Vesting Period

Fixed

Performance-Based

Fixed^

----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Applicable Performance Metrics -----------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Compensation    

Committee

judgment

Return on Equity

Formulaic pool funding, plus

Compensation Committee

judgment

Total Stockholder Return

Return on Equity

Selected Fee Income

Formulaically determined, plus

Compensation Committee

judgment

 

 

Stock Price Appreciation

Determination of Performance-Based Payouts

---

Formulaic + Discretion

Formulaic + Negative Discretion

---

2015

Outcomes

Merit adjustments156% of executive pool funded based on ROE performance; individual payouts varied

Not yet earned for 2015

First year of performance period:

•   2015 Relative TSR:Ranked 6th (65th percentile) against 2015

Peer Group

•   2015 ROE: Exceeded minimum

•   2015 Selected Fee Income: Achieved 106% of target

 

 

Continued year over year stock

price momentum

2015 TSR

performance ranked 6th

(65thpercentile) relative to 2015 Peer

Group

 *^

Any incremental value realized above the grant value of time-based RSUs, as well as earned PRSUs, is based on stock price appreciation.appreciation.

**

Return on Equity (“ROE”); Total Stockholder Return (“TSR”).

29

LOGO     EXECUTIVE OFFICERS & COMPENSATION


2015 EXECUTIVE COMPENSATIONAND OTHER HIGHLIGHTS

 

CEO PAY ALIGNMENT

WITH

COMPANY PERFORMANCE

2017 Named Executive Officers
GREG BECKER, President and Chief Executive Officer  

  Continued alignment between Company performance and CEO’s total 2015 compensation:

LOGO

The Compensation Committee takes into consideration a varietyJOHN CHINA, Head of factors in determining actual CEO compensation. For illustrative purposes, the graphs above show the general directional comparison between our CEO’s total compensation (as reported in our 2015 Summary Compensation Table) and selected key financial metrics:

•      Earnings per Share (“EPS”) and Net Income --- both core financial metrics generally used to evaluate overall Company performance; net income includes our fee income, which was added in 2015 as an additional performance metric for compensation purposes.

•      Relative Return on Equity (“ROE”) Performance --- a metric that is measured against our 2015 Peer Group for purposes of determining the funding of our ICP.

Technology Banking
DAN BECK, Chief Financial Officer  MICHAEL DREYER, Chief Operations Officer

BALANCED CEO

PAY MIX (COMPARED

WITH PEERS)

  Continued emphasis on performance-based and long-term compensation for the CEO:

LOGO

EMPHASIS ON

LONG-TERM

PERFORMANCE-BASED PAYMICHAEL DESCHENEAUX, President, Silicon Valley Bank (former CFO)

 

  

Shifted greater allocation of executive equity awards to performance-based vesting RSUs and time-based vesting RSUs

(from stock options)

FOCUS

INCENTIVES ON BUSINESS OBJECTIVESLAURA IZURIETA, Chief Risk Officer

 

Added a new fee income performance metric --- a key focus area of business growth

(for executive PRSU awards)

PRUDENTIAL

TAX

MANAGEMENT

Qualified PRSUs for corporate income tax deductibility under Section 162(m) of the tax code

SOUND EQUITY

MANAGEMENT

•      Utilized annual equity burn rate of 1.2% under equity plan (compared to 1.4% for 2014)

•      Added a minimum 1-year vesting requirement for stock options under our equity plan (in addition to our existing minimum requirements for other equity awards)


 

30

LOGO     EXECUTIVE OFFICERS & COMPENSATION


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION GOVERNANCE AND PRACTICES

29

OVERSIGHT AND
GOVERNANCE

LOGO
  

Independent oversight of executive compensation. The independent members of our Board of Directors oversee and approve the compensation of our CEO. Our EXECUTIVE OFFICERS & COMPENSATION

Compensation Committee (comprised of all independent directors) makes recommendations to the Board about our CEO���s compensation, and oversees and approves the compensation of all other executive officers.Discussion & Analysis

Independent compensation consultant to the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee’s independent compensation consulting firm does not provide any other services to the Company.

Active Compensation Committee engagement. In 2015, the Compensation Committee held ten (10) meetings to discuss compensation matters, including an extended annual compensation strategy session.

ALIGNMENT WITH
STOCKHOLDER INTERESTS

Robust executive equity ownership guidelines. Our executives are subject to robust equity ownership guidelines, which are regularly reviewed by the Compensation Committee. (Executive compliance against the guidelines is monitored by the Governance Committee of the Board of Directors on a quarterly basis.) In particular, our CEO’s minimum requirement is equal to six (6) times his annual base salary.

Active stockholder engagement. As part of our proxy statement preparation process, we routinely and proactively reach out to our key stockholders to solicit their feedback about our executive compensation program, including our equity compensation practices.

Focus on stockholder return. Our performance metrics for our executives’ performance-based restricted stock units and the funding of our ICP include the Company’s relative total stockholder return performance and return on equity performance, respectively, which in both cases include performance as measured against our peers.

Annual Say on Pay. We conduct a “Say on Pay” advisory vote on an annual basis. Our Board of Directors values the opinions of our stockholders and believes an annual advisory vote allows our stockholders to provide us with their input on our executive compensation program. In 2015, over 98% of the votes cast approved our 2014 executive compensation program.

COMPENSATION RISK MITIGATION
AND MANAGEMENT

Compensation risk management. The Compensation Committee, together with its compensation consultant, conducts annual compensation risk assessments, with input from our Chief Risk Officer. Based on those assessments, we do not believe that our compensation program creates risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company. Our compensation program is reviewed as part of our enterprise-wide risk management and internal audit programs. Moreover, the chairperson of our Compensation Committee is a member of the Risk Committee of the Board of Directors and discusses compensation risk issues with the Risk Committee.

Our incentives are subject to certain minimums and maximum limits.We establish minimum thresholds for certain incentives where awards/payouts may not be earned or made unless actual performance meets or exceeds thresholds, such as our PRSUs. We also establish maximum limits, such as for our executive PRSU awards, our annual cash incentives funding, and our broad-based profit sharing plan.

No hedging or pledging. Pursuant to our Insider Trading Policy, our directors, executive officers and employees are not permitted to “hedge” ownership by selling puts in or selling short any of our publicly-traded securities at any time. Additionally, we have not permitted any of our executive officers to pledge, or use as collateral, our securities to secure personal loans or other obligations.

 



2017 CEO COMPENSATION HIGHLIGHTS

 

312017 Company Performance

LOGO     EXECUTIVE OFFICERS & COMPENSATION


The Compensation Committee takes into consideration a variety of factors on a formulaic, as well as discretionary, basis, in determining actual CEO and executive compensation. As further detailed in the Proxy Summary Information section at the beginning of this Proxy Statement, the Company performed well in 2017. In particular, its annual earnings per share (“EPS”) and total net income increased by 26% and 28%, respectively, compared to the prior year of 2016. The Company’s annual return on equity (“ROE”) for 2017 was 12.38%, reflecting a 14% year-over-year increase. Our stock price performance was also strong, ranking first against our 2017 Peer Group based on total stockholder return. Accordingly, our CEO compensation for 2017 reflected the year’s strong performance as described below.

 

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION FEATURES

Competitive benchmarking against peers. In making compensation decisions, we consider compensation and performance data from our benchmarking reference peer group and other relevant and comparable industry sources. Additionally, we routinely review, on at least an annual basis, the composition of the companies within the peer group. See “Competitive Benchmarking Against Peers” below.

Double trigger change in control severance.Our executive Change in Control Plan encourages continued dedication and alignment with stockholders’ interests through a potential change in control event, and is subject to a double trigger feature.

No 280G excise tax gross-ups. Our executives are not entitled to any Section 280G excise tax gross-up payments under our executive Change in Control Plan or otherwise.

No employment agreements.We do not have any individual employment contracts with any of our named executive officers.

No executive perquisite or benefit programs.We do not have any executive perquisite programs. Other than our executive Change in Control Plan, we do not have any special executive benefits or any program that offer benefits exclusively to our executives. Our executives receive the same retirement, health, welfare and other benefits that are generally available to our employees, and may also participate in certain programs that are available to members of senior management, such as our Deferred Compensation Plan.

No special executive retirement benefits. Our executives are eligible to participate in our 401(k) plan (or other employee-funded retirement plan) that is broadly available to all employees. Wedo not provide any other pension, excess retirement, or supplemental executive retirement (“SERP”) plans to any executive.

 

EQUITY PLAN PRACTICES

LOGO

Our executives’ equity awards are made under our equity plan and have the following features/practices:

¡     No evergreen provision

¡    Minimum 100% fair market value exercise

      price for options

¡    Minimum 3-year time-based vesting for

      full value awards (our typical practice for

executives is vesting over 4 years)

¡    Minimum 1-year vesting for performance-

      based full value awards (our typical

practice for executives is vesting over

approximately 3 years)

¡    Minimum 1-year vesting for stock options

      awards (our typical practice for executives

is vesting over 4 years)

  

 

¡Stock Performance      No repricing without stockholder

 approval

pTotal Stockholder
Return
ranked #1
against 2017 peer
Group*

pSIVB Stock Price
36.2% year-over-
year increase**

 

¡    No liberal share recycling

¡    No single-trigger vesting upon change in

      control

¡    Annual burn rate maximum of 2.5%

¡    Each full value award share counted as

      two shares

¡    No tax gross-ups for plan awards

¡    Maximum 7-year term for options

* * * *

2017 CEO Pay Summary+

 

32

LOGO     EXECUTIVE OFFICERS & COMPENSATION


2017 Year-Over-Year Changes

    

CEO Compensation

LOGO

Based on SEC-reported total compensation

Total Target Pay

p 15%  

Primarily due to an increase in long-term equity incentive awards.

Total SEC-
Reported Pay

p 19%  

Primarily due to an increase in long-term equity incentive awards and higher annual cash incentive compensation due to strong Company and individual performance.

Continued Emphasis on Performance-Based, Long Term CEO Pay (Competitive with Peers)

Fixed v. Performance-Based CEO Target PayShort-Term v. Long-Term CEO Target Pay

2017 CEO Target Pay Mix

(Compared to 2017 Peer Group)

LOGO

LOGO

   Fixed Pay:                        Performance-Based Pay:

   Base Salary, RSUs           ICP, PRSUs, Stock Options

          Short-Term Pay:        Long-Term Pay:

          Base Salary, ICP          PRSUs,  RSUs, Stock Options

     83% of total target pay at risk (slight  

        increase from last year at 81%)

*

Based on TSR calculation methodology described on page 40.

**

Based on closing prices reported as of December 30, 2016 and December 29, 2017.

+

CEO Target Pay discussed in this summary is based on the actual equity grant value of target awards.



30

LOGO

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS & COMPENSATION PHILOSOPHY

Compensation Discussion & Analysis

EPS Net Income ROE SVB Fixed Peer Performance-Based 33% 33% 67% 67% SVB Short-Term Peers Long-Term 34% 45% 55% 66% Long-Term Equity Base Salary ICP 66% 17% 17%


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATIONAND PRACTICES

Highlights of our executive compensation program and practices are set forth below:(details are further discussed in this CD&A section)

Compensation Oversight and Governance

Independent Board* oversight of CEO compensation(based on the CompensationCommittee’s recommendations)

Independent Compensation Committee oversight ofnon-CEO executive compensation

Independent compensation consultant to the Compensation Committee

Active Compensation Committee engagement (held 8 meetings in 2017)

Focus on Stockholder Interests

Say on Pay vote on an annual basis (Say on Pay approval rate of 98.6% of votes cast in 2017)

Robust executive equity ownership guidelines

Continuing stockholder outreach to solicit feedback and to discuss our business and practices(throughout the year)

Performance metrics focused on stockholder return (including total stockholder return and return on equity)

Compensation Risk Mitigation and Management

Compensation risk management(includingannual risk assessments, internal audit review of compensation programs, oversight under the Company’s enterprise-wide risk management framework)

Minimums/maximums applied to incentive awards (minimum performance thresholds and maximum funding limits)

No hedging or pledging (executives not permitted to hedge ownership of our securities through selling puts or shorts, or to pledge our securities to secure personal obligations)

Executive Compensation Features

Competitive benchmarking against peers (both compensation and performance)

Double trigger change in control severance(under our executive Change in Control Plan)

No 280G excise taxgross-ups (under our executive Change in Control Plan)

No individual employment agreements for executives(unless required by law)

No executive perquisite/benefit programs

No special executive retirement benefits; no pension or SERP plans

Equity Plan Practices

Our executives’ equity awards are made under our 2006 Equity Incentive Plan and have the following features/practices:

General Features/Practices:

¡No evergreen provision

¡No recycling of shares used to pay for the exercise price of stock options

¡Annual burn rate maximum of 2.5% (2017 burn rate was 1.17%)

¡No single-trigger vesting upon change in control

¡No taxgross-ups for plan awards

Stock Options:

¡No stock option repricing/exchange without stockholder approval

¡No stock option reloads

¡Minimum 100% fair market value exercise price for options

¡Maximum7-year term for options

¡Minimum1-year vesting for stock options awards (typical practice – 4 years)

Full Value Awards:

¡Each full value award share counted as 2 shares

¡Minimum3-year time-based vesting for full value awards (typical practice – 4 year vesting)

¡Minimum1-year vesting for performance-based full value awards (typical practice –3-year vesting)

*  *  *  *

* Independent members acting as a committee, without CEO participation



31

LOGO

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS & COMPENSATION

Compensation Discussion & Analysis


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION PHILOSOPHYAND OBJECTIVES OBJECTIVES

 

The key compensation philosophy and objectives of our executive compensation program and practices are as follows:

 

•  Aligning the interests of our stockholders, our Company and employees;

 

  Alignment of Pay   with Business Performance and Stockholder Interests

Our executive compensation plans are designed to:

•  TieTying pay to Company and individual performance through appropriate performance metrics;

•  Provide for executive equity ownership to align economic interests with stockholders;

•  Provide the opportunity for compensation based upon stockholder returns, relative performance against peers,metrics and key financial measures; and

•  Take into account the dynamicsconsideration of the market and business environment within which the Company and management operate.dynamics;

 

Appropriate Pay Mix

We balance compensation•  Maintaining an appropriate pay mix, with an appropriate mix of pay between performance-based and non-performance-based pay, as well as long-term and short-term compensation, with emphasesemphasis on performance-based pay and long-term incentive compensation.compensation;

 

Maintain Competitive Pay

We pay•  Paying competitively relying primarilybased on external market standards, while also considering internal parity and the importance of recruitingparity;

•  Recruiting and maintaining a cohesive,top-talent executive management team.team; and

 

Strong Governance and   Risk Management   Practices

We maintain•  Focusing on strong governance practices over our program, including independent Board-level oversight. We also design incentive compensation based on Company and individual performance without encouraging undue risk-taking.risk management practices.

 

Our compensation philosophy and program take into consideration our business objectives (including our long-term global growth),; the relative complexity thisour business diversity represents in an organization of our size,size; stockholder interests,interests; appropriate risk management practices,practices; emerging trends in executive compensation (particularly for financial institutions),; applicable regulatory requirements,requirements; and market practices.

 

  

2015 Advisory Vote on 2014 Executive Compensation

“Say on Pay”

We submit an advisory vote on executive compensation, or Say on Pay, to our stockholders on an annual basis. In 2015, over 98% of the votes cast approved our 2014 executive compensation program (as described in our 2015 proxy statement). Based on such strong support and the extent of feedback received from our stockholders, the Compensation Committee made no material changes to our compensation philosophy, policies or overall program.

Nevertheless, we continue to carry out our executive compensation program based on our key philosophy and objectives as described above. The Compensation Committee will continue to consider changes to the program on an ongoing basis, as appropriate, in light of evolving factors such as business environment and competition for talent.

COMPENSATION GOVERNANCEAND RISK MANAGEMENT

 

33

LOGO     EXECUTIVE OFFICERS & COMPENSATION


Compensation Governance

The Company’s executive compensation program is supported by strong corporate governance and Board-level oversight:

Role of Compensation Committee; Compensation Committee Meetings

All members of the Compensation Committee are “independent” under applicable NasdaqNASDAQ rules. The Compensation Committee has primary oversight of our executive compensation program as provided in its charter, including the design and administration of executive compensation plans in a manner consistent with the executive compensation philosophy described above. The Compensation Committee:committee: (i) reviews and recommends for independent Board approval the compensation of the CEO, and (ii) reviews and approves the compensation of all othernon-CEO executive officers. In carrying out its oversight responsibilities, the Compensation Committeecommittee regularly reports to the Board on the actions it has taken, as well as confers with the Board on compensation matters, as necessary. The Compensation Committee also makes recommendations for all other compensation-related matters that require full Board approval.

The Compensation Committee meets on a regular basis, and routinely meets in executive session without management present. During 2015,2017, the Compensation Committee held ten (10)8 meetings, including an extended annual session where the Compensation Committee met with the Board Chair (also Chair of the Risk Committee), as well as key members of executive management, including the CEO, President of the Bank, Chief Financial Officer, the Head ofChief Human Resources Officer, Chief Risk Officer and the General Counsel, to discuss considerations for reviewing and enhancingreview compensation programs in light of the Company’s compensation strategy.strategic objectives, as well as relevant market trends.

Role of the Independent Board Members

Subject to the recommendation of the Compensation Committee, all of the independent directors of the Board (all Board members except the CEO)CEO, acting as a committee) review and approve the compensation for the CEO. Such review and approval are conducted during the executive session portion of the Board’s meetings,sessions, where neither the CEO nor any other member of management is present.

Role of Compensation Committee Consultant

The Compensation Committee has retained Pay Governance LLC (“Pay Governance”), an independent executive compensation consultant, to provide advice and recommendations on all compensation matters under its oversight responsibilities as defined in the Compensation Committee’s charter. The Compensation Committee in its sole discretion selects the consultant, and determines its compensation and the scope of its responsibilities.

In 2015, Pay Governance assisted the Compensation Committee with advice and recommendations regarding the Company’s compensation philosophy and strategies; advice on executive and director compensation levels and practices, including review and recommendations on CEO and other executive compensation and evaluation of CEO pay and Company performance; advice on the Company’s 2015 Peer Group; guidance on the design of our compensation plans and executive/director stock ownership guidelines; evaluation of performance metrics and peer performance; assistance with the Compensation Committee’s periodic review of potential risks associated with our compensation programs; recommendations regarding our equity incentive plan; and periodic reports to the Compensation Committee on market and industry compensation trends and regulatory developments. The Compensation Committee did not engage Pay Governance for any additional services outside of executive and director compensation consulting during 2015. In addition, the Compensation Committee does not believe there were any potential conflicts of interest that arose from any work performed by Pay Governance during 2015.

Role of Chief Executive Officer

At the Compensation Committee’s request, our CEO will attend portions of the Compensation Committee’s meetings and executive sessions to discuss the Company’s performance and compensation-related matters. While heHe does not participate in any deliberations relating to his own compensation, he shares his assessment of the performance of the other executive officers with the Compensation Committee. Based on his assessments and the Company’s overall performance, our CEO makes recommendations to the Compensation Committee on any compensation decisions or changes for the other executive officers.compensation. The Compensation Committeecommittee considers the CEO’s recommendations, as well as data and analyses provided by the Compensation Committee’s independent consultant (and to a lesser extent, management), but retains full discretion to approve, or recommend for the independent members of the Board to approve, all executive compensation.

Role of Compensation Committee Consultant

 

34The Compensation Committee has continued to retain Pay Governance LLC, an independent executive compensation consultant, to provide advice and recommendations on all compensation matters under its oversight responsibilities as defined in the committee’s charter. The Compensation Committee in its sole discretion selects the consultant, and determines its compensation and the scope of its responsibilities.

LOGO     EXECUTIVE OFFICERS & COMPENSATION


32

LOGO

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS & COMPENSATION

Compensation Discussion & Analysis


In 2017, Pay Governance assisted the Compensation Committee with: advice and recommendations regarding the Company’s compensation philosophy and strategies; advice on director and executive compensation levels and practices, including review and recommendations on director, CEO and other executive compensation and evaluation of CEO pay and Company performance; advice on the Company’s peer group; guidance on the design of our compensation plans and executive/director stock ownership guidelines; evaluation of performance metrics and peer performance; assistance with the Compensation Committee’s annual review of potential risks associated with our compensation programs; recommendations regarding our 2006 Equity Incentive Plan; and periodic reports to the Compensation Committee on market and industry compensation trends and regulatory developments.

Pay Governance provides services only to the Compensation Committee, and not to the Company, and did not provide any additional services to the committee outside of executive and director compensation consulting during 2017. In addition, the Compensation Committee does not believe there were any potential conflicts of interest that arose from any work performed by Pay Governance during 2017.

Compensation Risk Management

A primary area of focus of the Compensation Committee is compensation risk management. The committee, together with its compensation consultant, conducts annual risk assessments of our compensation program, which include process, tone and culture. Our compensation program is also reviewed by our internal audit function, as well as discussed as part of our Risk Appetite Statement and enterprise risk management efforts. Based on these various steps, we do not believe that our compensation program creates risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company.

Moreover, our compensation programs and risks are routinely discussed at the Board-level, both with and without the CEO present. In particular, the chairperson of our Compensation Committee reports to and discusses compensation risk issues with the full Board and the Risk Committee. The chairperson of the Compensation Committee and one other member of the committee (who also serves as the chairperson of the Audit Committee) are members of the Risk Committee of the Board of Directors. Additionally, certain compensation matters are also reviewed with the Audit Committee, particularly as it relates to exclusions under our ICP funding.

ANNUAL SAYON PAY; FOCUSON STOCKHOLDERS

Say on Pay Frequency

We submit an advisory vote on executive compensation, or Say on Pay, to our stockholders on an annual basis. Our Board of Directors values the opinions of our stockholders and believes an annual advisory vote allows our stockholders to provide us with their input on our executive compensation program.

We conducted an advisory vote on the frequency of the advisory Say on Pay vote at our 2017 Annual Meeting. Following the recommendation of our stockholders in 2017, we will continue to hold our advisory Say on Pay vote on an annual basis.

2017 Say on Pay Advisory Vote

In 2017, over 98.6% of the votes cast approved our 2016 executive compensation program (as described in our 2017 proxy statement). In light of the strong voting support and the extent of other feedback we have solicited from our stockholders, the Compensation Committee remained consistent with our executive compensation philosophy, policies or overall program, and did not make any material changes. Nevertheless, we continue to carry out our executive compensation program based on our key philosophy and objectives as described above. The Compensation Committee will continue to consider changes to the program on an ongoing basis, as appropriate, in light of evolving factors such as our corporate strategy, the business environment and competition for talent, as well as stockholder feedback.

Stockholder Focus

We are focused on the interests of our stockholders. Our two primary performance metrics selected for our performance-based incentive awards measure stockholder return: (i) total stockholder return (for our executives’ performance-based restricted stock unit awards); and (ii) return on equity (for our annual incentive compensation awards). In both cases, we measure performance relative to our peers.

33

LOGO

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS & COMPENSATION

Compensation Discussion & Analysis


We conduct active investor outreach activities throughout the year to engage with our stockholders. Additionally, as part of our annual proxy statement preparation process, we routinely and proactively reach out to our key stockholders to invite their feedback, including their view about our executive compensation program.

COMPENSATION DECISIONS

Our Compensation Committee is responsible for deciding the design of the executive compensation structure (including choosing and setting applicable performance metrics, selecting the forms of compensation, determining the overall pay mix and setting pay levels) and approving actual executive compensation awards. (In the case of the CEO, the Compensation Committee makes recommendations about CEO pay decisions for approval by the independent members of the full Board.) Decisions are typically made within the first quarter of each year, both to determine the compensation design applicable for any performance period involving that particular and subsequent years, and to approve any incentive awards based on the prior year’s performance.

While compensation decisions are made during the earlier part of the year, the rest of the year is focused on monitoring performance against set goals and determining funding accruals, as well as other aspects of the compensation program, including, among other things, peer group review, compensation design changes for the subsequent years, compensation risk review, and monitoring market and governance trends impacting compensation.

As further discussed below, in making compensation decisions, the Compensation Committee considers a variety of factors and data, including peer benchmarking and other industry data and performance reviews of individual executives. The key decisions for 2017 relating to our NEOs are also summarized below under “2017 NEO Compensation Decisions.”

Competitive Benchmarking Against Peers

For 2017, the Compensation Committee benchmarked and compared our compensation and performance with our peer companies, in a manner consistent with prior years. The names of the 18 companies on our 2017 Peer Group list is set forth below.

 

2015 Peer Group

2015 Peer Group

Associated Banc-Corp

BOK Financial Corp

City National Corp.*

Comerica Incorporated

Commerce Bancshares, Inc.

Cullen/Frost Bankers, Inc.

East West Bancorp, Inc.

FirstMerit Corporation

First Republic Bancorp

Huntington Bancshares

Investors Bancorp, Inc.

MB Financial, Inc.

Prosperity Bancshares, Inc.

Signature Bank

Umpqua Holdings Corporation

Webster Financial Corp.

Zions Bancorporation

Consistent with 2014, for 2015, the Compensation Committee benchmarked and compared our compensation and performance with our peer companies. Our 2015 Peer Group companies are companies that are similarly-sized, have certain business model similarities, and compete with us for our talent. (A list of our 17 peer group companies used for 2015 is set forth at the left.)

Annual Peer Group Review

The Compensation Committee, with its compensation consultant and management, reviews on at least an annual basis, the composition of the 2015 Peer Group.peer group. In determining the composition, the Compensation Committee considers various factors and characteristics including, but not limited to,among other things, industry, business model, complexity of the business, geography, market capitalization, asset size, assets under management, number of employees, business model and complexity of the platform, and performance on financial and market-based measures.measures, and extent they compete with us for talent.

 

The 2015Based on the above considerations, the Compensation Committee added six new companies to the 2017 Peer Group was updated from 2014 as follows: (i) added Comerica Incorporated, Huntington Bancshares(indicated with an asterisk (*) on the list to the right), and Zions Bancorporation,removed three companies (FirstMerit Corporation (acquired), and primarily due to similar business models;asset size, Investors Bancorp, Inc. and (ii) removed Bank of Hawaii Corporation, First CitizensProsperity Bancshares, Inc., PacWest Bancorp, TCF Financial Corporation, UMB Financial Corporation).

It is important to note that in determining executive compensation, the Compensation Committee does not solely rely on comparative data from the 2017 Peer Group. Such comparative data provides helpful market information about our peer companies, but the Compensation Committee does not target any specific positioning or percentile, nor does it use a formulaic approach, in determining executive pay levels. The Compensation Committee also utilizes other resources, including published compensation surveys (from Towers Watson and Valley National Bancorp, due to their different business models and/or market focus.

It is important to note that in determining executiveMcLagan) and other available proxy and compensation the Compensation Committee does not solely rely on comparative data from the 2015 Peer Group. Such comparative data provides helpful market information about our peer companies, but the Compensation Committee does not target any specific positioning or percentile, nor does it use a formulaic approach, in determining executive pay levels. The Compensation Committee also utilizes other resources, including published compensation surveys and proxy data. All such comparative peer data and supplemental resources are considered, along with the Company’s pay for performance and internal parity objectives. All applicable information is reviewed and considered in aggregate, and the Compensation Committee does not place any particular weighting on any one factor.

2017 Peer Group

(18 companies)

Associated Banc-Corp

BOK Financial Corporation

Comerica Incorporated

Commerce Bancshares, Inc.

Cullen/Frost Bankers, Inc.

E*TRADE Financial Corporation*

East West Bancorp, Inc.

First Republic Bancorp

Huntington Bancshares

KeyCorp*

M&T Bank Corporation*

New York Community Bancorp Inc.*

Northern Trust Corporation*

Regions Financial Corporation*

Signature Bank

Umpqua Holdings Corporation

Webster Financial Corp.

Zions Bancorporation

*  New for 2017

34

LOGO

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS & COMPENSATION

Compensation Discussion & Analysis


Executive Performance Reviews

In making compensation decisions or recommendations for individual executives, the Committee takes into consideration the performance reviews conducted for each executive officer, which includes a self-review of the prior year’s performance. The Committee meets and discusses with the CEO his assessment of the performance of the other executive officers, based on such self-reviews and the CEO’s own evaluation. The independent members of the Board meet and discuss, without the CEO present, their collective performance assessment of the CEO, taking into consideration his self-review and the individual evaluation provided by each Board member.

Executives are evaluated based on Company performance as well as individual performance. Specific performance metrics for annual and long-term incentive awards are based on corporate-wide performance, including return on equity, total stockholder return, selected fee income, and relative performance against peers. All executives are subject to the same corporate-wide performance metrics. In addition, executives are evaluated based on his or her individual performance and overall contributions. Evaluation criteria may include, among other things: skills and expertise, demonstrated leadership, development of strategy, span of responsibility, achievement of corporate and personal goals, risk management, talent management, regulatory compliance, and alignment with the Company’s pay for performance and internal parity objectives. All applicable information is reviewed and considered in aggregate, and thecore values.

2017 NEO Compensation Committee does not place any particular weighting on any one factor.Decisions

 

*

Acquired during 2015; for performance benchmarking purposes, we replaced this company with the performance average of the applicable metric of the other peer companies at the end of 2015.

35

LOGO     EXECUTIVE OFFICERS & COMPENSATION


2015 Executive Compensation

SummaryHighlights of 2015 Key Executive Compensation Componentsthe key compensation decisions for 2017 are set forth, the details of which are discussed in this CD&A section:*

 

   Component and  Purpose 

2015 Key Highlights

    

 

General

Component

 

  

 

CEO2017 Determinations

 

 

LOGO    

Base Salary

  

 

Other NEOs

NEO merit increases (2.7% - 22.0%) reflect broadening span of NEO responsibilities amidst an increasingly complex business environment

 

Short-Term Cash Compensation 

LOGO   

 

Base Salary

Provides ongoing fixed cash pay.

  ---4.0% merit increase

5-7% merit increase, except for CFO who received 14.3% increase due to exceptional performance and span of responsibilities

Annual Cash Incentives

Provides short-term (annual) performance-based cash incentive compensation opportunity under our ICP.

  

No material changes to performance-based funding methodology for 2015:

¡2017: (i) 2/3 of the pool based on ROE performance against our annual target ROE;budget; and

¡ (ii) 1/3 of the pool based on relative ROE performance relative against peer performance.

Annualthe 2017 Peer Group. Based on the above performance metrics, 153% of the 2017 total ICP target increased from 80% to 90% based on market benchmarking.pool was funded.

 

 

Annual ICP targets for NEOs stayed at prior year’s level or was increasedincreased. For 2017, actual ICP awarded ranged from 144% to 60% due to market benchmarking and internal parity.

167% of individual target payout.

 

  

Based on the Company’s ROE performance above its annual target and its ranking against its peers, as well as the Company’s overall performance, 156% of the 2015 executive incentive pool was funded.LOGO    

 

 For 2015, actual CEO ICP was 150% of target payout.For 2015, actual ICP received ranged from 148% to 182% of target payout.
Long-Term Equity Incentive Compensation  

Performance-Based

Restricted Stock Units (“

(“PRSUs”)

Provides incentives to motivate and retain executives and to reward for our performance relative to peers based on certain specific metrics.

  

PRSUs granted in 2017 vest subject to

performance over a3-year period based on (each 50% of the award): (i) the Company’s TSR performance relative to peers; and (ii) the Company’s ROE (funding threshold) and Selected Fee Income performance.

 

2015 allocation (based on

2017 PRSUs represented 50% of the total value of alleach NEO’s target long-term equity awards)increased from 34% to 50%compensation.

  

Stock Options

 

Provides incentives for long-term creation of stockholder value over a four-year period.

  

All stock options and RSU awards are subject to standard annual vesting over a four-year period

2015 allocation (based on the total value of all equity awards)decreased from 46% to 25%4-year period.

 

Restricted Stock Units (“

(“RSUs”)

2017 stock options and RSUs each represented 25% of the total value of each NEO’s target long-term equity compensation.

*

Excluding Mr. Beck’s 2017 equity awards, which were granted in connection with his hiring in June 2017.

**

Approximately 75% of the average total target compensation for NEOs, including the CEO, is at risk.

35

LOGO

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS & COMPENSATION

Compensation Discussion & Analysis


 

OVERVIEWOF NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

We have six named executive officers (“Provides incentivesNEOs”) for retention2017. These executives represent some of the Company’s key areas of focus in 2017 — our banking business, operational infrastructure, risk management and long-term creationfinancial performance. Their respective compensation for 2017 was commensurate with each of stockholder value over a four-year period.his/her individual performance, his/her contributions to the Company’s overall performance, and his/her leadership and expanded span of responsibilities in his/her respective area.

Mr. Descheneaux, our former Chief Financial Officer, was promoted effective June 2017 to the role of President, Silicon Valley Bank. Mr. Beck, our Chief Financial Officer who joined in June 2017, along with Mr. Dreyer and Ms. Izurieta are NEOs for the first time since joining the Company.    

2017 NEOs

LOGOGREG BECKER,President and Chief Executive Officer

LOGODAN BECK,Chief Financial Officer

LOGOMICHAEL DESCHENEAUX,President, Silicon Valley Bank (former Chief Financial Officer; promoted in 2017)

LOGOJOHN CHINA,Head of Technology Banking

LOGOMICHAEL DREYER,Chief Operations Officer

LOGOLAURA IZURIETA,Chief Risk Officer

 

  
2015 allocation (based on the total value of all equity awards)increased from 20% to 25%

ELEMENTSOF EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

 

36

LOGO     EXECUTIVE OFFICERS & COMPENSATION


Elements of 2015 Compensation

Base Salary

We providepay base salaries in order to provide executives with a reasonable level of fixed short-term compensation. Executive base salary levels are typically reviewed at least annually by the Compensation Committee and adjusted as appropriate, typically as merit increases, promotions or changes in responsibilities, or market adjustments. Base salaries are determined on an individual basis. When determining any base salary increases, the Compensation Committee considers an individual’s total compensation package, his or her performance, Company performance, comparative peer and market compensation data, internal parity, and other relevant factors, including the scope of the executive’s responsibilities relative to peers and other executives, and retention concerns.

 

      
NEO   Year-Over-
Year
Increase
   

2017 Annual

Base Salary

    
  

Greg Becker

  2.7%  $  950,000   
  

Dan Beck

     525,000   
  

Michael Descheneaux

  16.7   700,000   
  

John China

  5.0   525,000   
  

Michael Dreyer

  11.1   500,000   
  

Laura Izurieta

   22.0    500,000   

In 2015,2017, each NEO, except our Chief Financial Officer (who was hired in 2017), received merit increase adjustments to their base salaries based on individual performance, salary market positioning relative to peers, and internal parity, as appropriate. In particular, the salary increase for Mr. Descheneaux reflects: (i) his overall exceptional performance, and (ii) the increasing complexities under his span of responsibilities, including preparation for compliance of financial requirements applicable to large financial institutions with over $50 billion in total average assets.

NEO    Percentage
Increase
     

2015 Annual

Base Salary

   

Greg Becker

    4.0    $  910,000   

Michael Descheneaux

   14.3      600,000   

John China

    6.7      480,000   

Joan Parsons

    6.7      480,000   

Bruce Wallace

    5.9      450,000   

applicable.

Annual Cash Incentives (Incentive Compensation Plan)

   
      (% of Annual Salary) 
  
NEO    Prior Year
(2016) ICP
Target
     

2017 Annual

ICP Target

 
  

Greg Becker

    100    100
  

Dan Beck

         70 
  

Michael Descheneaux

    70     90 
  

John China

    70     80 
  

Michael Dreyer

    60     80 
  

Laura Izurieta

     50      60 

Our NEOs, as well as other executives and employees, participate in the Company’s Incentive Compensation Plan (“ICP”), an annual cash incentive plan that rewards performance against individual and Company objectives.

NEO

Annual

ICP Target

(% of Annual Base
Salary)

Greg Becker

90 

Michael Descheneaux

60

John China

60

Joan Parsons

60

Bruce Wallace

60

Each executive participant is assigned an incentive target, stated as a percentage of the individual’s annual base salary. In 2015,Based on the Compensation Committee’s annual compensation review, in 2017, ICP targets:

Increased from 80% to 90%targets for Mr. Becker; and

Increased from 50% to 60% for Messrs. Descheneaux and Wallace.

These adjustments were made in order to align targetsNEOs reflected the committee’s focus on balancing overall total target pay mix with an emphasis towards increasing the allocation ofat-risk compensation, as well as comparative peer and market compensation and to balance overall total target pay mix. In addition, the adjustments applicable to Messrs. Descheneaux and Wallace were made to maintain internal parity among the executive team, as applicable. No changes were made to targetsdata for Mr. China or Ms. Parsons.their respective positions.

 

36

LOGO

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS & COMPENSATION

Compensation Discussion & Analysis


ICP Funding

Each year, the Compensation Committee establishes one or more metrics that it will use to measure Company performance for ICP funding purposes. Based on those metrics and overall Company performance, the Compensation Committee will also determine the extent to which the Company will fund the incentive pool.

For 2015, the Compensation Committee utilized the same methodology for funding the ICP as in 2014 in all material respects. The Compensation Committee continued to believe that return on equity (“ROE”) is an appropriate indicator of financial

37

LOGO     EXECUTIVE OFFICERS & COMPENSATION


performance that drives stockholder value, especially if performance is measured against the Company’s target objectives, as well as peer performance. Accordingly, the Compensation Committee continued to apply the following two performance metrics:

 

¡ROE Against our Annual Target ROE (Two-Thirds (2/3) of Pool) - Two-thirds (2/3) ofEach year, the totalCompensation Committee establishes one or more metrics that it will use to measure Company performance for ICP funding purposes, on an absolute basis, as well as relative to peers. Based on those metrics and overall Company performance, the committee will also determine the extent to which the Company will fund the incentive pool for the broad employee base, including executive officers. For 2017, the Compensation Committee utilized the same methodology for funding the ICP as in prior years in all material respects. The committee continued to believe that return on equity (“ROE”) is funded based onan appropriate indicator of financial performance that drives stockholder value, especially if performance is measured against the Company’s target objectives, as well as peer performance, relative to our Board-approved annual target ROE. The graph to the right illustrates the relationship in 2015 between: (i) achieved (but adjustedas outlined below:

Performance Metrics for the exclusions discussed below) ROE of 11.08% as a percentage of our annual target ROE (which was budgeted for 2015 at 9.53%), and (ii) the percentage of the target incentive pool accrued. There is a funding maximum of 200% of target (for achievement of 150% or over of our target ROE).ICP Funding

 

In addition,

•  ROE measured against budget

•  ROE relative to 2017 Peer Group

ROE Performance Against Annual Budget(Two-Thirds (2/3) of Pool)Two-thirds (2/3) of the total incentive pool is funded based on the Company’s ROE performance (as adjusted for the exclusions discussed below) relative to our Board-approved annual target (budget) ROE, as illustrated by the graph below to the left. There is a funding maximum of 200% of target (for achievement of 150% or over of our target ROE). Additionally, the funding slope applicable to thesub-pool for executives is steeper than the general broad-based pool, where there is no formulaic funding for executives if the Company meets less than 90% of its annual target ROE (compared to 80% of the target for employees).

Exclusions/Adjustments

The Compensation Committee retains discretion to determine the extent to which the Company met its ICPROE performance target, including discretion to consider adjustmentstarget. It may adjust for certain out of the ordinary ornon-recurring items. items, or other items that are subject to factors beyond management’s control, such as investment securities gains and losses or interest rate changes. Adjustments are determined by the Compensation Committee, in consultationcoordination with the Audit Committee.

For 2015 and consistent with prior years,2017, excluded items included: (i) the Compensation Committee excluded 50% of the gains on non-marketable securities over budget (net of noncontrolling interests), since such gains are subject to market performance. In addition, for 2015, the Compensation Committee excluded certain immaterial gains attributable to an adjustment to foreign exchange losses recognizedimpact from changes in 2014 relating to the sale of the Company’s India business.

¡ROE Against Peer Group (One-Third (1/3) of Pool) - One third (1/3) of the total incentive pool is funded based on the Company’s ROE performance relative to the 2015 Peer Group. As illustratedFederal Reserve interest rates (not otherwise included in the graph to the right, there is no payout if our performance falls in certain bottom positions, and a payout maximum in the top three positions.

 

2017 exclusions

LOGOresulted in reduced

The Compensation Committee retains discretion to fund up to 50%overall funding of

the target ICP pool for performance below the 90% threshold, if and when it believes that making partial ICP payments are in the Company’s interests. This pool is provisional and in no way does it represent a form of guaranteed incentive funding.

annual budget); (ii) certain gains or losses of the Company’s investment securities (includingnon-marketable securities, warrant securities andavailable-for-sale securities), largely because performance of such securities are subject to market performance beyond the Company’s control; (iii) certaintax-related adjustments, including those relating to the recently-enacted Tax Cuts and Jobs Act; and (iv) other various items relating toout-of-period adjustments orone-time events, such as the redemption of the Company’s Trust Preferred Securities and SVB Analytics’ sale of its valuation business. The net impact of these exclusions resulted in a lower adjusted ROE metric that reduced the overall funding of the 2017 ICP pool.

ROE Performance Against 2017 Peer Group(One-Third (1/3) of Pool) – The otherone-third of the total incentive pool is funded based on the Company’s actual ROE performance of 12.38% relative to the 2017 Peer Group, as illustrated in the graph below to the right. There is no payout if our performance falls in the bottom five positions, and a payout maximum if our performance falls in the top four positions. The extent of funding earned is subject to straight-line interpolation based on ROE performance between the fifth and fourteenth ranked companies.

 

LOGO

Our ranking is based on our full year 2015 ROE performance, compared to the ROE performance of our 2015 Peer Group from the fourth quarter 2014 through the third quarter 2015, due to the timing and availability of peer performance information.

LOGO

LOGO

For 2015,

* While the Compensation Committee determined that:retains discretion to fund a portion of the bonus pool if performance thresholds are not achieved, this discretion was not exercised in 2017.

37

LOGO

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS & COMPENSATION

Compensation Discussion & Analysis


For 2017, the Compensation Committee approved the funding of the total ICP pool at 153% of total target, based on: (i) the Company’s ROE (as adjusted) of 12.11% against the annual target ROE of 10.53%, resulting in the funding of 130% for 2/3 of the executive ICP pool would be funded at 132%total pool; and (ii) the Company��s ranking in the second highest position against our 2017 Peer Group, resulting in the maximum funding of target, based on the Company’s ROE performance, as adjusted, after taking into account the adjustments as discussed above; and (ii)200% for 1/3 of the executive ICP pool would be funded at 183% of target, based on the Company’s relative ROE performance, ranking in the fourth position (76th percentile) against the 2015 Peer Group. In addition to these two ROE metrics, the Compensation Committee took into consideration the overall strong performance of the Company and the executive team in 2015. In particular, they took into consideration: overall strong executive leadership as a team; exceptional annual financial performance, including, in particular, EPS and net income increases and strong financial growth in assets, loans and client fund balances; strong overall performance relative to peers; continued progress towards global growth; and continued focus on risk management. As a result, the Compensation Committee approved funding the overall executive ICP pool at 156% of total target.

pool.

 

38

LOGO     EXECUTIVE OFFICERS & COMPENSATION


20152017 NEO ICP Awards

The Compensation Committee (or in the case of the CEO, the independent members of the Board) determines actual annual cash incentive awards for the NEOs based upon the individual’s target incentive level, the Company’s performance, and the NEO’s individual performance. ICP awards for NEOs may be at, above, or below the target incentive. For 2015,2017, each NEO was awarded the ICP amounts set forth in the table to the right.

NEO  

20152017

ICP Award

  

Greg Becker

  $  1,225,0001,435,000

Dan Beck

325,000+ 

Michael Descheneaux

   575,000965,000 

John China

   525,000650,000 

Joan ParsonsMichael Dreyer

   425,000575,000 

Bruce WallaceLaura Izurieta

   440,000500,000 

+

Represents a prorated award for Mr. Beck who was hired in June 2017.

 

In determining such 20152017 awards, the Board considered Mr. Becker’s performance assessment conducted by the independent members of the Board, and the Compensation Committee considered the performance assessments of each of the other NEOs as conducted by Mr. Becker, as well as input from the independent members of the Board.

In addition, the independent members of the Board (with respect to Mr. Becker) and the Compensation Committee (with respect to the other NEOs) considered a variety of factors that they believed to be relevant, including: (i) the overall strong performance of the Company and the respective areas of oversight of each NEO in 2017, and (ii) each NEO’s contributions to our business and financial results, execution of our 20152017 corporate initiatives, corporate risk management, and broader leadership within the organization.

Specifically for Mr. Becker, certainkey factors considered included:

 

Strong 2015 profitabilityHealthy financial performance and financial performance:

growth in 2017:
¡

Annual EPS increase by 24.7%26%

¡

Annual net income available to common stockholders increase by 30.3%28%

Strong Company growth:

¡

Total average   Average total asset growth by 23.9%10%

¡

Total average      Average total loan balances (net of unearned

   income) increase by 28.3%16%

¡ 

Total average deposit   Average total client funds (deposits and total client

   investment fundfunds) balance growth by 28.2% and 30.6%, respectively15%

   Core fee income growth of 20%*

¡

Continued growth in non-GAAP core fee income* of 26.8% (see Appendix A)stable credit performance

GrowthStrategic leadership of the Company, focusing on the growth of the core banking business domestically and internationally, including in market share; 18% increase in net client count

new European and Canadian markets

Continued global growth

ContinuedStrengthening of the corporate brand and steadfast focus on enterprise-wideclient satisfaction

Appropriate prioritization and focus on risk management

and regulatory compliance

ExpansionContinued execution of the Company’s diversity and enhancementinclusion initiatives

Ongoing development of executive leadership team

Key factors considered by the Compensation Committee for the other NEOs, included: (i) for Mr. Beck, excellence in execution of overall financial management, particularly his leadership in capital management; (ii) for Mr. Descheneaux, his effective transition into his new role as President of the Bank, demonstrating strong leadership in strategic execution and global expansion; (iii) for Mr. China, his outstanding leadership of our Technology Banking business, especially continued client engagement and development of his leadership team with a focus on diverse talent; (iv) for Mr. Dreyer, his exceptional leadership in the continued strengthening of the Company’s operations and infrastructure to increase efficiencies; and (v) for Ms. Izurieta, her strong leadership in the continued strengthening and evolution of the Company’s risk management function.

 

39* Core Fee Income is comprised of our foreign exchange fees, credit card fees, deposit service charges, lending related fees, client investment fees and letters of credit fees — each of which are components of our noninterest income. Please see a reconciliation of Core Fee Income, anon-GAAP financial measure, to the most closely related GAAP financial measure on page 53 of our Annual Report on Form10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017.

LOGO     EXECUTIVE OFFICERS & COMPENSATION

38

LOGO

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS & COMPENSATION

Compensation Discussion & Analysis


Long-Term Equity Incentives

 

LOGO

The Company believes that equity-based awards, particularly in combination with the Company’s
equity ownership guidelines as discussed below, tie each of the NEOs’ compensation to the
Company’s long-term financial performance and align the interests of the NEOs and our
stockholders.

In 2015, the Compensation Committee continued to focus on long-term, sustainable performance and alignment with stockholder interests. Accordingly, based on its review of peer benchmarking comparisons, the committee continued its emphasis on long-term equity compensation, shifting more of the allocation of equity awards from stock options to PRSUs and to a lesser extent, RSUs. The Compensation Committee determined a targettypically makes equity award total value forawards to each NEO based on peer benchmarking comparisons,at the
time the individual is hired or promoted, and granted a mixannually thereafter. The size of performance-based and non-performance based equitythe awards based on reflects
the 2015 allocation as set forthoverall number of shares available to the left.Company under our equity incentive plan, the
Compensation Committee’s determination of an appropriate annual equity burn rate (the
percentage of total shares outstanding that the Company has issued during the year in the form
of equity compensation), the NEO’s role and performance, and the market compensation data
for the NEO’s external peers.

 

Stock Options and Restricted Stock Units (RSUs)

Allocation of Total Equity Award

 

LOGO

In 2017, the Compensation Committee continued to focus on long-term, performance-based equity compensation, keeping consistent with the equity mix from the prior year. The committee determined a target equity award total value for each NEO based on peer benchmarking comparisons, and granted a mix of 50% performance-based RSUs, and 25% each of stock options and time-based vesting RSUs. For information about the actual grants made in 2017, see the “Grants of Plan-Based Awards” under “Compensation for Named Executive Officers.”

Stock Options and Restricted Stock Units (RSUs)

Stock options and restricted stock units (RSUs) are subject to annual vesting over a four-year period. The stock options have a maximum term of 7 years. No performance-based criteria was established, as the increase in the value of these stock options, and the value of the RSUs, are inherently tied to the future performance of the Company’s common stock. 2017 annual vesting over a four-year period. The stock options have a maximum term of seven years. No additional performance-based criteria were established, as the increase in the value of these stock options, and the value of the RSUs, are inherently tied to the future performance of the Company’s Common Stock. 2015 stock option and RSU grants were made effective as of May 1, 2015.

Performance-based Restricted Stock Units (PRSUs)

Performance-based restricted stock units (PRSUs) are earned based on the achievement of certain performance conditions, as determined by the Compensation Committee. After the end of the specified performance period, the Compensation Committee will determine whether (and to what extent) the NEOs had earned the PRSUs, based on the Company’s Relative TSR, ROE and Selected Fee Income performance. The PRSUs are subject to a maximum total payout at 150% of target award. No payout is made if the Company ranks in the bottom five peer companies.

Similar to 2014, for 2015, PRSUs are subject to performance-based vesting over a three-year period (from 2015 through 2017). To the extent earned, PRSUs are subject to additional time-based vesting through January 30, 2018. 2015 PRSU grants were made effective as of March 30, 2015. Additionally for 2015, the Compensation Committee designed the PRSUs to qualify as performance-based compensation under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code by subjecting the awards to the following performance conditions:May 2, 2017.

Performance-based Restricted Stock Units (PRSUs)

Performance-based restricted stock units are earned based on the achievement of certain performance metrics, as determined by the Compensation Committee. These metrics typically measure the Company’s performance on an absolute basis, as well as relative to peers. After the end of the specified performance period, the committee will determine whether (and to what extent) the NEOs earned the PRSUs, subject to a maximum total payout of 150% of target award.

For 2017, the Compensation Committee utilized the same performance metric design for the PRSUs as in the prior year in all material respects. The NEOs were granted, effective as of February 21, 2017, PRSUs that were subject to performance-based vesting over a3-year period (from 2017 through 2019) and certain designated performance metrics. To the extent earned, these awards are subject to additional time-based vesting through January 30, 2020. The PRSUs were designed to qualify as performance-based compensation under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code under then current law. 2017 represents the first year of a3-year performance period, hence none of the PRSUs granted in 2017 have been earned. The performance metrics for the 2017 PRSUs are as follows:

Performance Metrics
for PRSUs

•  TSR relative to 2017 Peer Group

•  ROE (as funding threshold)

•  Selected Fee Income (foreign exchange
and credit card fees
)

39

LOGO

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS & COMPENSATION

Compensation Discussion & Analysis


 

¡Relative TSR Against 20152017 Peer Group (50% of Award). Fifty percent50% of the PRSU award is funded at a maximum payout of 150% of target, and earned (subject to time-based vesting) based on the Company’s TSR1 performance over a3-year performance period as ranked against the 20152017 Peer Group (“(“Relative TSRTSR”)”). The(The Compensation Committee may apply negative discretion to reduce the actual award, as it deems appropriate.

) The Compensation Committeecommittee selected Relative TSR as a key PRSU performance metric because it correlates directly with the Company’s stock price performance, and hence, is alignedwhich aligns with stockholder interests. No payout is made if the Company ranks in any of the bottom five positions.

 

For 2015 only,2017, the Companyfirst year of the three year performance period, we ranked in the 6thfirst position (65th percentile) against the 2015our 2017 Peer Group.

  LOGOLOGO

40

LOGO     EXECUTIVE OFFICERS & COMPENSATION


¡

ROE Funding Threshold and Selected Fee Income Target (50%Target(50% of Award). The other 50% of the PRSU award is funded at a maximum payout of 150% of target and earned (subject to additional time-based vesting) based on the Company’s achievement of a3-year annual average ROE performance threshold of 5% or higher. (No funding if ROE falls below 5%.) (The Compensation Committee may apply negative discretion to reduce the actual funding, as it deems appropriate.)

 

The other fifty percent of the PRSU award is funded at a maximum 150% payout subject to the Company’s achievement of a three-year annual average ROE performance threshold of 5% or higher. (No funding below 5%.) The Compensation Committee may apply negative discretion to reduce the actual funding, as it deems appropriate.

If the ROE performance threshold is achieved and funding has been established, the Compensation Committee will, as it deems appropriate, determine the extent of the award earned based on the Company’s performance against the three-year annual average of its budgeted annual income from foreign exchange fees and credit card fees (“Selected Fee Income”). The budgeted income targets shall be specified in the Company’s overall annual budget as approved by the Board of Directors.

LOGO

The Compensation CommitteeCompany’s performance against the 3-year annual average of its budgeted annual income from foreign exchange fees and credit card fees (“Selected Fee Income”). Consistent with prior years, the committee determined Selected Fee Income as an additionala PRSU performance metric mainly due to the desire to diversify the Company’s sources of income, in particular,non-interest income. Our foreign exchange and credit card-based businesses are key parts of our business targeted for growth.

LOGO

2015 representsFor 2017, the first year of the3-year performance period: (i) the Company’s actual ROE of 12.38% exceeded the 5% funding threshold; and (ii) the Company achieved $192.3 million in Selected Fee Income, or 95% of the budgeted total.

Previously Granted PRSU Awards for Performance Period Ended in 2017

In 2015, Messrs. Becker, Descheneaux and China were granted PRSU awards subject to performance over a three-year performance period hence none of(2015-2017). (Messrs. Beck and Dreyer and Ms. Izurieta had not yet joined the PRSUs granted in 2015 have been earned.

The Compensation Committee typically makes equity awards to each NEOCompany at the time of grant in 2015.) Similar to the individual is hired or promoted, and annually thereafter. The size2017 PRSUs described above: (i) 50% of the awards reflects the overall number of shares availableaward was subject to the Company under our equity incentive plan,Company’s TSR performance relative to peers, and (ii) 50% of the award was subject to the Company’s ROE (funding threshold) and Selected Fee Income performance.

Upon completion of the performance period, the Compensation Committee’s determination of an appropriate annual equity burn rate (the percentage of total shares outstanding thatCommittee determined that: (i) the Company’s relative TSR performance ranked in the first position against the applicable 2015 peer group (of 17 companies), and (ii) the 5% minimum ROE funding threshold was met, and the Company has issued duringachieved 106%, 98% and 95% of its Selected Fee Income targets for 2015, 2016 and 2017, respectively. Consequently, the yearcommittee determined that 125% of the target PRSU awards were earned. The awards were also subject to a brief time-based vesting requirement, and were fully vested as of January 30, 2018.

1 TSR is measured based on the average closing stock price for the last two months of the applicable performance period and the average closing stock price for the two months immediately preceding the performance period, with dividends reinvested.

40

LOGO

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS & COMPENSATION

Compensation Discussion & Analysis


Other Compensation for CFO

When Mr. Beck joined the Company in June 2017 as Chief Financial Officer, he received the following as part of his compensation: (i) an equity award for 2017 with a value of approximately $650,000, of which 75% was in the form of restricted stock units and 25% in the form of stock options, all of which are subject to4-year time-based vesting; (ii) aone-time new hire equity compensation),award of approximately $300,000 in the NEO’s roleform of restricted stock units, which is also subject to a 4-year time-based vesting; and performance, and the market compensation data for the NEO’s external peers.(iii) aone-time new hire cash award of $300,000, which is subject to repayment if his employment is terminated in certain circumstances within1-year of his start date.

EXECUTIVE BENEFITSAND OTHER EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION-RELATED MATTERS

Executive Benefits

Employee Retirement Benefits

Our NEOs are eligible to participate in our SVB Financial Group 401(k) (“401(k) Plan”) and Employee Stock Ownership Plan (“ESOP”), our combined qualified retirement and profit sharing plan that is generally available to all of the Company’s U.S. employees. Our NEOs participate in the plan on the same terms as all other eligible employees. Other than our 401(k) plan, SVB Financial Group doesPlan, we do not provide any pension, excess retirement or SERPssupplemental executive retirement (“SERP”) to our NEOs.

Under our 401(k) plan,Plan, our U.S. employees, including our NEOs, may make voluntarypre-tax and/or traditional/Rothpost-tax deferrals up to the maximum provided for by IRS regulations. The Company providesdollar-for-dollar matching contributions up to a maximum of 5% of cash compensation or the Internal Revenue Section 401(a) compensation limit, whichever is less. Company 401(k) matching contributions vest immediately upon deposit into the individual’s 401(k) account.

The plan also includes a profit sharing component — the Employee Stock Ownership Plan (the “ESOP”).component. Under the ESOP, we may make discretionary annual contributions for U.S. employees, as determined by the Compensation Committee. ESOP

41

LOGO     EXECUTIVE OFFICERS & COMPENSATION


contributions may be in the form of cash, the Company’s Common Stock,common stock or a combination of both, and are subject to certain vesting conditions. Contributions are determined based on the Company’s performance and are not adjusted to reflect individual performance.

Similar to 2014,2016, for 2015,2017, the Compensation Committee established performance criteria based on the Company’s adjusted ROE similar toagainst budget (same as the calculation of 2/3 of the total ICP pool) to fund the ESOP contribution, and set the funding level to a 2.5% (of1.25% of eligible compensation) funding levelcompensation based on target ROE performance, upperformance. Despite a higher allowable maximum under the ESOP, the Compensation Committee has committed to a funding maximum funding of 5%. Based on the Company’s 20152017 above-target ROE performance, the Compensation Committee approved a contribution of 3.3%1.63% of eligible compensation in cash (50%) and the Company’s Common Stockcommon stock (50%) for all eligible participants.

Deferred Compensation

We do not provide NEOs with any Company-funded deferred compensation benefits. However, in order to help them achieve their retirement objectives, we offer each NEO the opportunity totax-defer a portion of their income, beyond what is allowed to be deferred in the Company’s qualified retirement plan. Specifically, under our Deferred Compensation Plan (“DCP,”), each individual may defer 5% to 50% of their base pay and 5% to 100% of eligible incentive payments during each plan year. The DCP is an unfunded plan, and participating executives bear the risk of forfeiture in the event that we cannot fund DCP liabilities. We do not match executive deferrals to the DCP, nor do we make any other contributions to the DCP. See “Compensation for Named ExecutiveOfficers—Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation”below.

We establish and maintain a bookkeeping account for each participant whichthat reflects compensation deferrals made by the executive along with any associated earnings, expenses, gains and losses. The amount in a participant’s account is adjusted for hypothetical investment earnings or losses in an amount equivalent to the gains or losses reported by the investment options selected by the participant from among the investment options designated for this purpose by the Company. A participant may, in accordance with rules and procedures we establish, change the investments to be used for the purpose of calculating future hypothetical investment adjustments to the participant’s account. The account of each participant is adjusted each business day to reflect: (a) the hypothetical investment earnings and/or losses described above; (b) participant deferrals; and (c) distributions or withdrawals from the account. Distributions or withdrawals from the DCP shall be made in full accordance with the requirements of Internal Revenue Code Section 409A. No NEOs participated in the DCP in 2015. Among the NEOs, only Mr. Becker holds a balance dueand Ms. Izurieta are participants in the plan. Mr. Becker received in January 2017 the first of five annual installments relating to deferrals made under the plancertain compensation deferred in 2005.

41

LOGO

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS & COMPENSATION

Compensation Discussion & Analysis


Health and Welfare BenefitsBenefits/Time Away From Work

Our NEOs are eligible to participate in our standard health and welfare benefits program, which provides medical, dental, life, accident and disability coverage to all of our eligible U.S.-based employees. We do not provide executives with any health and welfare benefits that are not generally available to other Company employees.

Time Away From Work

Under Additionally, under our “time away from work” policy, U.S. exempt employees, including our NEOs, do not accrue vacation benefits. Rather, such employees are expected to manage their time away from work, subject to the demands and needs of their jobs.Non-exempt U.S. employees and othernon-U.S. employees continue to accrue vacation benefits formulaically.

Executive Termination BenefitsGrants of Plan-Based Awards

See” underCompensation for Named Executive Officers—Other Post-Employment PaymentsOfficers. below.

PerquisitesStock Options and Restricted Stock Units (RSUs)

We do not have any executive perquisite programs. From time to time, on a limited or exception basis, we may provide other benefits that we believe are related to a business purpose or are customary outside of the U.S. that may otherwise be considered perquisites. We disclose those benefits as required by applicable rules.

Stock Option and Other Equity Practices

Grant Practices for Executive Officers

The Compensation Committee approved all equity grants in 2015 made to executive officers of the Company, except that the independent members of the Board approved equity grants made to the Chief Executive Officer. Except for awards that qualify as performance-based compensation under Section 162(m) of the Code (as defined below) which are awarded during the first quarter of the year, annual equity compensation grants to executives have typically been approved during the second quarter of the year. Grants are made effective during an open trading window pursuant to our Insider Trading Policy, with limited

42

LOGO     EXECUTIVE OFFICERS & COMPENSATION


exceptions. The exercise price for stock option grants is equal to the closing market price on the grant’s effective date and grants typically have an annual vesting period of four years, subject to continued employment or service. All 2015 grants to our NEOs were made in accordance with this practice.

For newly-hired executive officers, the Compensation Committee approves an equity grant amount prior to, or shortly after, the executive’s start of employment, and the effective grant date is typically set during an open trading window after such executive commences employment. This approach provides for the exercise price of stock options to reflect a fair market price, since the exercise price for stock option grants is equal to the closing market price on the grant’s effective date.

Grant Practices for Other Employees

The Board has delegated authority to the Equity Awards Committee to make equity grants to non-executive employees under our 2006 Equity Incentive Plan. The Equity Awards Committee is a committee of two, comprised of our Chief Executive Officer and the Chair of our Board. The Equity Awards Committee may not make equity grants to executives or any non-executive employee that reports directly to the Chief Executive Officer.

The Equity Awards Committee may make grants only within established individual employee and aggregate share limits and in accordance with established requirements regarding the term, vesting period, exercise price and other terms and conditions for the grant. In addition, all grants of stock options, stock appreciation rights, and restricted stock units made by the Equity Awards Committee must be made (or become effective) on the first Monday of the month following approval or, where the first Monday is a Company-observed U.S. holiday, on the first Tuesday of such month. The Equity Awards Committee approves grants on a quarterly basis, and must approve all grants in writing on or before the date of grant,are subject to the respective employee remaining an employee as of the date of grant. Finally, management updates the Compensation Committee regarding all grants made by the Equity Awards Committee onannual vesting over a regular basis. Any grant that does not meet the requirements established for the Equity Awards Committee must be made by the Board, the Compensation Committee or other authorized committee.

four-year period. The Compensation Committee typically approves annual grants to all eligible employees, as well as any other grants that the Equity Awards Committee is not authorized to approve.

Prohibitions Against Hedging

Pursuant to our Insider Trading Policy, our directors, executive officers (including our NEOs) and employees are not permitted to “hedge” ownership by selling puts in or selling short any of the Company’s publicly-traded securities at any time. Additionally, we discourage, and have not permitted, any of our executive officers to pledge, or use as collateral, our securities to secure personal loans or other obligations.

Compensation Recovery Policies

Except as noted below, our Compensation Committee has not yet adopted a policy with respect to whether we will make retroactive adjustments to any cash or equity based incentive compensation paid to our NEOs or other employees where the payment was based on the achievement of financial results that were subsequently revised. Our Compensation Committee intends to adopt a general compensation recovery policy after the SEC adopts final rules implementing the requirements of Section 954 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. In 2015, our Compensation Committee approved an amendment to our 2006 Equity Incentive Plan to provide that equity awards granted under the 2006 Equity Incentive Plan will be subject to the terms and conditions of any compensation recovery policy adopted by the Company and as may be in effect from time to time.

Section 162(m)

Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”) limits our deductibility of compensation paid to our CEO and each of the next three most highly compensated executive officers (excluding the Chief Financial Officer) in excess of $1,000,000, but excludes “performance-based compensation” from this limit. Our stock options have a maximum term of 7 years. No performance-based criteria was established, as well as beginning for the year 2015, our executives’ PRSU awards, qualify for this tax deductibility. However, in order to maintain flexibility and promote simplicityincrease in the Compensation Committee’s administrationvalue of and oversight over executive compensation arrangements, other compensation arrangements, such as time-based restrictedthese stock units that vest based solely on continued serviceoptions, and ICP payments, do not qualify for tax deductibility. This design allows the Compensation Committee to balance tax deductibility with other business priorities that affect stockholder value.

Compensation that qualify as “performance-based” under Section 162(m) are also reviewed and approved by an independent committee of the Board of Directors, comprised of Mr. Dunbar, our Board Chair, and Mr. Robinson, our Audit Committee Chair and member of the Compensation Committee.

43

LOGO     EXECUTIVE OFFICERS & COMPENSATION


Equity Ownership Guidelines for Executive Officers

The Company maintains stock ownership guidelines for the Company’s executive officers, including the NEOs. These stock ownership guidelines reflect the Board’s belief in the importance of aligning the economic interests of stockholders and management.

The Compensation Committee is responsible for setting and periodically reviewing the guidelines. Guidelines for each executive position are determined based on factors including the executive role, scope of responsibilities, base salary levels, Company stock price performance and market data. The current equity ownership guidelines applicable to executive officers are based on the value of the RSUs, are inherently tied to the future performance of the Company’s Commoncommon stock. 2017 annual stock option and RSU grants were made effective as of May 2, 2017.

Performance-based Restricted Stock as a percentage of annual base salary,Units (PRSUs)

Performance-based restricted stock units are earned based on the achievement of certain performance metrics, as determined by the Compensation Committee. These metrics typically measure the Company’s performance on an absolute basis, as well as relative to peers. After the end of the specified performance period, the committee will determine whether (and to what extent) the NEOs earned the PRSUs, subject to a maximum total payout of 150% of target award.

For 2017, the Compensation Committee utilized the same performance metric design for the PRSUs as in the prior year in all material respects. The NEOs were granted, effective as of February 21, 2017, PRSUs that were subject to performance-based vesting over a3-year period (from 2017 through 2019) and certain designated performance metrics. To the extent earned, these awards are subject to additional time-based vesting through January 30, 2020. The PRSUs were designed to qualify as performance-based compensation under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code under then current law. 2017 represents the first year of a3-year performance period, hence none of the PRSUs granted in 2017 have been earned. The performance metrics for the 2017 PRSUs are as follows:

Performance Metrics
for PRSUs

•  TSR relative to 2017 Peer Group

•  ROE (as funding threshold)

•  Selected Fee Income (foreign exchange
and credit card fees
)

39

LOGO

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS & COMPENSATION

Compensation Discussion & Analysis


 

Stock ValueRelative TSR Against 2017 Peer Group (50% of Award). 50% of the PRSU award is funded at a maximum payout of 150% of target, and earned based on the Company’s TSR1 performance over a3-year performance period as Percentageranked against the 2017 Peer Group(“Relative TSR”). (The Compensation Committee may apply negative discretion to reduce the actual award, as it deems appropriate.) The committee selected Relative TSR as a key PRSU performance metric because it correlates directly with the Company’s stock price performance, which aligns with stockholder interests. No payout is made if the Company ranks in any of Annual  Base Salarythe bottom five positions.

Chief Executive Officer

For 2017, the first year of the three year performance period, we ranked in the first position against our 2017 Peer Group.

  600%LOGO

Chief Credit Officer

Chief Digital OfficerROE Funding Threshold and Selected Fee Income Target(50% of Award). The other 50% of the PRSU award is funded at a maximum payout of 150% of target and earned (subject to additional time-based vesting) based on the Company’s achievement of a3-year annual average ROE performance threshold of 5% or higher. (No funding if ROE falls below 5%.) (The Compensation Committee may apply negative discretion to reduce the actual funding, as it deems appropriate.)

Chief Financial Officer

Chief Operations Officer

Chief Risk Officer

Head EMEA & President UK Branch

HeadIf the ROE performance threshold is achieved and funding has been established, the Compensation Committee will, as it deems appropriate, determine the extent of Relationship Banking

Head of Specialty Bankingthe award earned based on the

  300%

LOGO

Company’s performance against the 3-year annual average of its budgeted annual income from foreign exchange fees and credit card fees (“Selected Fee Income”). Consistent with prior years, the committee determined Selected Fee Income as a PRSU performance metric mainly due to the desire to diversify the Company’s sources of income, in particular,non-interest income. Our foreign exchange and credit card-based businesses are key parts of our business targeted for growth.

For 2017, the first year of the3-year performance period: (i) the Company’s actual ROE of 12.38% exceeded the 5% funding threshold; and (ii) the Company achieved $192.3 million in Selected Fee Income, or 95% of the budgeted total.

Previously Granted PRSU Awards for Performance Period Ended in 2017

In 2015, Messrs. Becker, Descheneaux and China were granted PRSU awards subject to performance over a three-year performance period (2015-2017). (Messrs. Beck and Dreyer and Ms. Izurieta had not yet joined the Company at the time of grant in 2015.) Similar to the 2017 PRSUs described above: (i) 50% of the award was subject to the Company’s TSR performance relative to peers, and (ii) 50% of the award was subject to the Company’s ROE (funding threshold) and Selected Fee Income performance.

Upon completion of the performance period, the Compensation Committee determined that: (i) the Company’s relative TSR performance ranked in the first position against the applicable 2015 peer group (of 17 companies), and (ii) the 5% minimum ROE funding threshold was met, and the Company achieved 106%, 98% and 95% of its Selected Fee Income targets for 2015, 2016 and 2017, respectively. Consequently, the committee determined that 125% of the target PRSU awards were earned. The awards were also subject to a brief time-based vesting requirement, and were fully vested as of January 30, 2018.

1 TSR is measured based on the average closing stock price for the last two months of the applicable performance period and the average closing stock price for the two months immediately preceding the performance period, with dividends reinvested.

40

Chief Information Officer

Chief Marketing Officer

General Counsel

Head of Human Resources

LOGO
  200%

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS & COMPENSATION

Compensation Discussion & Analysis

All executive officers have five years to attain


Other Compensation for CFO

When Mr. Beck joined the minimum level of ownership.

The Governance Committee monitors compliance with these guidelines and reviews executive equity holdings on a quarterly basis. In evaluating whether executives are meeting the ownership guidelines, the Governance Committee considersCompany in June 2017 as Chief Financial Officer, he received the following as shares owned: (1) shares actually held, (2) shares owned through investmentpart of his compensation: (i) an equity award for 2017 with a value of approximately $650,000, of which 75% was in the Company’sform of restricted stock fundunits and 25% in the form of stock options, all of which are subject to4-year time-based vesting; (ii) aone-time new hire equity award of approximately $300,000 in the form of restricted stock units, which is also subject to a 4-year time-based vesting; and (iii) aone-time new hire cash award of $300,000, which is subject to repayment if his employment is terminated in certain circumstances within1-year of his start date.

EXECUTIVE BENEFITSAND OTHER EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION-RELATED MATTERS

Executive Benefits

Employee Retirement Benefits

Our NEOs are eligible to participate in our SVB Financial Group 401(k) (“401(k) Plan”) and Employee Stock Ownership Plan (“ESOP”), our combined qualified retirement and (3) earned but unvested awardsprofit sharing plan that is generally available to all of restricted stock awards and restricted stock units (subjectthe Company’s U.S. employees. Our NEOs participate in the plan on the same terms as all other eligible employees. Other than our 401(k) Plan, we do not provide any pension, excess retirement or supplemental executive retirement (“SERP”) to either time-based our NEOs.

Under our 401(k) Plan, our U.S. employees, including our NEOs, may make voluntarypre-tax and/or performance-based vesting). Neither vested nor unvested stock options count towardstraditional/Rothpost-tax deferrals up to the ownership guidelines. Exceptionsmaximum provided for by IRS regulations. The Company providesdollar-for-dollar matching contributions up to meetinga maximum of 5% of cash compensation or the guidelines due to personal financial or other reasons are reviewed andInternal Revenue Section 401(a) compensation limit, whichever is less. Company 401(k) matching contributions vest immediately upon deposit into the individual’s 401(k) account.

The plan also includes a profit sharing component. Under the ESOP, we may make discretionary annual contributions for U.S. employees, as determined by the GovernanceCompensation Committee. ESOP contributions may be in the form of cash, the Company’s common stock or a combination of both, and are subject to certain vesting conditions. Contributions are determined based on the Company’s performance and are not adjusted to reflect individual performance.

AsSimilar to 2016, for 2017, the Compensation Committee established performance criteria based on the Company’s adjusted ROE against budget (same as the calculation of December 31, 2015,2/3 of the total ICP pool) to fund the ESOP contribution, and set the funding level to 1.25% of eligible compensation based on target ROE performance. Despite a higher allowable maximum under the ESOP, the Compensation Committee has committed to a funding maximum of 5%. Based on the Company’s 2017 above-target ROE performance, the Compensation Committee approved a contribution of 1.63% of eligible compensation in cash (50%) and the Company’s common stock (50%) for all eligible participants.

Deferred Compensation

We do not provide NEOs with any Company-funded deferred compensation benefits. However, in order to help them achieve their retirement objectives, we offer each NEO the opportunity totax-defer a portion of their income, beyond what is allowed to be deferred in the Company’s qualified retirement plan. Specifically, under our DCP, each individual may defer 5% to 50% of their base pay and 5% to 100% of eligible incentive payments during each plan year. The DCP is an unfunded plan, and participating executives bear the risk of forfeiture in the event that we cannot fund DCP liabilities. We do not match executive deferrals to the DCP, nor do we make any other contributions to the DCP. See “Compensation for Named ExecutiveOfficers—Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation”below.

We establish and maintain a bookkeeping account for each participant that reflects compensation deferrals made by the executive along with any associated earnings, expenses, gains and losses. The amount in a participant’s account is adjusted for hypothetical investment earnings or losses in an amount equivalent to the gains or losses reported by the investment options selected by the participant from among the investment options designated for this purpose by the Company. A participant may, in accordance with rules and procedures we establish, change the investments to be used for the purpose of calculating future hypothetical investment adjustments to the participant’s account. The account of each participant is adjusted each business day to reflect: (a) the hypothetical investment earnings and/or losses described above; (b) participant deferrals; and (c) distributions or withdrawals from the account. Distributions or withdrawals from the DCP shall be made in full accordance with the requirements of Internal Revenue Code Section 409A. Among the NEOs, Mr. Becker and Ms. Izurieta are participants in the plan. Mr. Becker received in January 2017 the first of five annual installments relating to certain compensation deferred in 2005.

41

LOGO

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS & COMPENSATION

Compensation Discussion & Analysis


Health and Welfare Benefits/Time Away From Work

Our NEOs are eligible to participate in our standard health and welfare benefits program, which provides medical, dental, life, accident and disability coverage to all of our NEOs were in complianceeligible U.S.-based employees. We do not provide executives with the applicable ownership guidelines.

44

LOGO     EXECUTIVE OFFICERS & COMPENSATION


COMPENSATION FOR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

Summary Compensation Table

The following table sets forth the compensation paidany health and welfare benefits that are not generally available to other Company employees. Additionally, under our “time away from work” policy, U.S. exempt employees, including our NEOs, fordo not accrue vacation benefits. Rather, such employees are expected to manage their time away from work, subject to the years ended December 31, 2013, 2014demands and 2015.needs of their jobs.Non-exempt U.S. employees and othernon-U.S. employees continue to accrue vacation benefits formulaically.

Name and Principal Position

      Year       Salary
         ($)        
   Bonus
    ($) (1)    
   Stock
Awards
        ($) (2)        
   Stock
Option
Awards
        ($) (2)        
   Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
    Compensation    

($) (3)
    All Other
Compensation
        ($)(4)        
   Total
    ($)    
 

Greg Becker,

   2015     912,333     -     2,092,890     670,964     1,225,000         25,947     (5)     4,927,134   

    President and Chief

   2014     869,167     -     1,175,470     1,070,211     935,000     22,924     (6)     4,072,772   

    Executive Officer

   2013     835,613     -     1,336,868     867,018     925,000     22,389     (7)     3,986,888   

Michael Descheneaux,

   2015     592,885     -     837,104     268,394     575,000     22,508     (8)     2,295,891   

    Chief Financial Officer

   2014     520,833     600     517,225     470,896     425,000     21,347     (9)     1,955,901   
   2013     499,780     -     739,544     474,665     450,000     22,389   (10)     2,186,378   

John China,

   2015     479,308     -     456,520     146,366     525,000     24,383   (11)     1,631,577   

    Head of Relationship

   2014     437,500     600     282,044     256,837     380,000     21,890   (12)     1,378,871   

    Banking

   2013     373,113     -     412,438     235,961     1,072,500   (13)  22,389   (14)     2,116,401   

Joan Parsons,

   2015     479,308     -     456,520     146,366     425,000     23,680   (15)     1,530,874   

    Head of Specialty

   2014     441,667     600     282,044     256,837     380,000     24,067   (16)     1,385,215   

    Banking

   2013     399,780     -     405,327     257,910     350,000     22,389   (17)     1,435,406   

Bruce Wallace,

   2015     449,872     -     456,520     146,366     440,000     22,609   (18)     1,515,367   

    Chief Digital Officer

   2014     420,833     600     282,044     256,837     260,000     21,455   (19)     1,241,769   
   2013     398,113     -     398,216     257,910     350,000     22,389   (20)     1,426,628   

(1)

Reflects the value of a cash gift card given to the executive in 2014.

(2)

Values indicated for equity awards reflect the fair value of grants made during the fiscal year. Such values were computed in accordance with the Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718 (“ASC Topic 718”). The amounts disclosed may never be realized. Assumptions used in calculating these amounts are included in the note entitled “Share-Based Compensation” in our audited financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the applicable year. The amounts disclosed under the “Stock Awards” column also include the fair value grants of certain performance-based restricted stock unit awards reported based on achievement at target level. Such awards are subject to a maximum of 150% of target level. For details of 2015 grants, see “Grants of Plan-Based Awardsbelow.under “Compensation for Named Executive Officers.”

(3)

Includes: (a) ICP payments;Stock Options and (b) for 2013, Mr. China’s one-time longRestricted Stock Units (RSUs)

Stock options and restricted stock units are subject to annual vesting over a four-year period. The stock options have a maximum term cash retention award.

(4)

In additionof 7 years. No performance-based criteria was established, as the increase in the value of these stock options, and the value of the RSUs, are inherently tied to the amounts discussed infuture performance of the following footnotes, included in this column for 2015 are reimbursement paymentsCompany’s common stock. 2017 annual stock option and RSU grants were made effective as of income taxes incurred by the NEOs on imputed income (“May 2, 2017.

Imputed Income Tax ReimbursementsPerformance-based Restricted Stock Units (PRSUs)”). For 2015, such imputed income was primarily associated with spousal travel and attendance to our business events where our NEOs’ spouses or significant others were invited, and expected, to attend.

(5)

Other compensation for Mr. Becker in 2015 is comprised of: (a) ESOP contribution of $8,745; (b) 401(k) Plan matching contribution (“401(k) Match”) of $13,250; and (c) Imputed Income Tax Reimbursement of $3,952.

(6)

Other compensation for Mr. Becker in 2014 includes: (a) ESOP contribution of $7,800; and (b) 401(k) Match of $13,000.

(7)

Other compensation for Mr. Becker in 2013 is comprised of: (a) ESOP contribution of $9,639; and (b) 401(k) Match of $12,750.

(8)

Other compensation for Mr. Descheneaux in 2015 is comprised of: (a) ESOP contribution of $8,745; (b) 401(k) Match of $13,250; and (c) Imputed Income Tax Reimbursement of $513.

(9)

Other compensation for Mr. Descheneaux in 2014 includes: (a) ESOP contribution of $7,800; and (b) 401(k) Match of $13,000.

(10)

Other compensation for Mr. Descheneaux in 2013 is comprised of: (a) ESOP contribution of $9,639; (b) and 401(k) Match of $12,750.

(11)

Other compensation for Mr. China in 2015 is comprised of: (a) ESOP contribution of $8,745; (b) 401(k) Match of $13,250; and (c) Imputed Income Tax Reimbursement of $2,388.

(12)

Other compensation for Mr. China in 2014 includes: (a) ESOP contribution of $7,800; and (b) 401(k) Match of $13,000.

(13)

Non-equity incentive plan compensation for Mr. China in 2013 is comprised of: (a) one-time long term cash retention award of $597,500; and (b) ICP payment of $475,000.

(14)

Other compensation for Mr. China in 2013 is comprised of: (a) ESOP contribution of $9,639; and (b) 401(k) Match of $12,750.

(15)

Other compensation for Ms. Parsons in 2015 is comprised of: (a) ESOP contribution of $8,745; (b) 401(k) Match of $13,250; and (c) Imputed Income Tax Reimbursement of $1,685.

(16)

Other compensation for Ms. Parsons in 2014 includes: (a) ESOP contribution of $7,800; and (b) 401(k) Match of $13,000.

(17)

Other compensation for Ms. Parsons in 2013 is comprised of: (a) ESOP contribution of $9,639; and (b) 401(k) Match of $12,750.

(18)

Other compensation for Mr. Wallace in 2015 is comprised of: (a) ESOP contribution of $8,745; (b) 401(k) Match of $13,250; and (c) Imputed Income Tax Reimbursement of $614.

(19)

Other compensation for Mr. Wallace in 2014 includes: (a) ESOP contribution of $7,800; and (b) 401(k) Match of $13,000.

(20)

Other compensation for Mr. Wallace in 2013 is comprised of: (a) ESOP contribution of $9,639; and (b) 401(k) Match of $12,750.

 

45

LOGO     EXECUTIVE OFFICERS & COMPENSATION


Grants of Plan-Based Awards

The following table sets forth all plan-based awards, including both equity awards and non-equity incentive awards under plans, made to our NEOs during the year ended December 31, 2015.

    Compensation
Committee or
Board

Approval Date
 Estimated Future Payouts Under
Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards
(1)
 Estimated Future Payouts
Under Equity Incentive Plan

Awards (2)
 All Other
Stock
Awards;
Number
of Shares
of Stock
or Units
(3)
 All Other
Option
Awards;
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Options
 Exercise
or Base
Price of
Option
Awards
(4)
 Grant Date
Fair Value
of Stock
and Option
Awards(5)

Name

 Grant Date  

 

Threshold
($)

 

 

Target

($)

 Maximum
($)
 Threshold
(#)
 Target
(#)
 Maximum
(#)
    

Greg Becker

 January 22, 2015 January 22, 2015   -      819,000      -      -      -      -      -      -     $-     $-   

Greg Becker

 March 30, 2015 March 27, 2015   -      -      -      5,500      11,000      16,500      -      -      -      1,395,680  

Greg Becker

 May 1, 2015 March 27, 2015   -      -      -      -      -      -      5,371      -      -      697,210  

Greg Becker

 May 1, 2015 March 27, 2015   -      -      -      -      -      -      -      16,237      129.81      670,964  

Michael Descheneaux

 January 22, 2015 January 22, 2015   -      360,000      -      -      -      -      -      -      -      -   

Michael Descheneaux

 March 30, 2015 March 19, 2015   -      -      -      2,200      4,400      6,600      -      -      -      558,272  

Michael Descheneaux

 May 1, 2015 March 19, 2015   -      -      -      -      -      -      2,148      -      -      278,832  

Michael Descheneaux

 May 1, 2015 March 19, 2015   -      -      -      -      -      -      -      6,495      129.81      268,394  

John China

 January 22, 2015 January 22, 2015   -      288,000      -      -      -      -      -      -      -      -   

John China

 March 30, 2015 March 19, 2015   -      -      -      1,200      2,400      3,600      -      -      -      304,512  

John China

 May 1, 2015 March 19, 2015   -      -      -      -      -      -      1,171      -      -      152,008  

John China

 May 1, 2015 March 19, 2015   -      -      -      -      -      -      -      3,542      129.81      146,366  

Joan Parsons

 January 22, 2015 January 22, 2015   -      288,000      -      -      -      -      -      -      -      -   

Joan Parsons

 March 30, 2015 March 19, 2015   -      -      -      1,200      2,400      3,600      -      -      -      304,512  

Joan Parsons

 May 1, 2015 March 19, 2015   -      -      -      -      -      -      1,171      -      -      152,008  

Joan Parsons

 May 1, 2015 March 19, 2015   -      -      -      -      -      -      -      3,542      129.81      146,366  

Bruce Wallace

 January 22, 2015 January 22, 2015   -      270,000      -      -      -      -      -      -      -      -   

Bruce Wallace

 March 30, 2015 March 19, 2015   -      -      -      1,200      2,400      3,600      -      -      -      304,512  

Bruce Wallace

 May 1, 2015 March 19, 2015   -      -      -      -      -      -      1,171      -      -      152,008  

Bruce Wallace

 May 1, 2015 March 19, 2015   -      -      -      -      -      -      -      3,542      129.81      146,366  

 

 

(1)

Performance-based restricted stock units are earned based on the achievement of certain performance metrics, as determined by the Compensation Committee. These metrics typically measure the Company’s performance on an absolute basis, as well as relative to peers. After the end of the specified performance period, the committee will determine whether (and to what extent) the NEOs earned the PRSUs, subject to a maximum total payout of 150% of target award.

For 2017, the Compensation Committee utilized the same performance metric design for the PRSUs as in the prior year in all material respects. The NEOs were granted, effective as of February 21, 2017, PRSUs that were subject to performance-based vesting over a3-year period (from 2017 through 2019) and certain designated performance metrics. To the extent earned, these awards are subject to additional time-based vesting through January 30, 2020. The PRSUs were designed to qualify as performance-based compensation under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code under then current law. 2017 represents the first year of a3-year performance period, hence none of the PRSUs granted in 2017 have been earned. The performance metrics for the 2017 PRSUs are as follows:

Performance Metrics
for PRSUs

•  TSR relative to 2017 Peer Group

•  ROE (as funding threshold)

•  Selected Fee Income (foreign exchange
and credit card fees
)

The ICP amounts represent target levels; there are no individual threshold or maximum amounts.

39

LOGO

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS & COMPENSATION

Compensation Discussion & Analysis


(2)

Relative TSR Against 2017 Peer Group (50% of Award). 50% of the PRSU award is funded at a maximum payout of 150% of target, and earned based on the Company’s TSR1 performance over a3-year performance period as ranked against the 2017 Peer Group(“Relative TSR”). (The Compensation Committee may apply negative discretion to reduce the actual award, as it deems appropriate.) The committee selected Relative TSR as a key PRSU performance metric because it correlates directly with the Company’s stock price performance, which aligns with stockholder interests. No payout is made if the Company ranks in any of the bottom five positions.

For 2017, the first year of the three year performance period, we ranked in the first position against our 2017 Peer Group.

LOGO

ROE Funding Threshold and Selected Fee Income Target(50% of Award). The other 50% of the PRSU award is funded at a maximum payout of 150% of target and earned (subject to additional time-based vesting) based on the Company’s achievement of a3-year annual average ROE performance threshold of 5% or higher. (No funding if ROE falls below 5%.) (The Compensation Committee may apply negative discretion to reduce the actual funding, as it deems appropriate.)

If the ROE performance threshold is achieved and funding has been established, the Compensation Committee will, as it deems appropriate, determine the extent of the award earned based on the

LOGO

Company’s performance against the 3-year annual average of its budgeted annual income from foreign exchange fees and credit card fees (“Selected Fee Income”). Consistent with prior years, the committee determined Selected Fee Income as a PRSU performance metric mainly due to the desire to diversify the Company’s sources of income, in particular,non-interest income. Our foreign exchange and credit card-based businesses are key parts of our business targeted for growth.

For 2017, the performance-basedfirst year of the3-year performance period: (i) the Company’s actual ROE of 12.38% exceeded the 5% funding threshold; and (ii) the Company achieved $192.3 million in Selected Fee Income, or 95% of the budgeted total.

Previously Granted PRSU Awards for Performance Period Ended in 2017

In 2015, Messrs. Becker, Descheneaux and China were granted PRSU awards subject to performance over a three-year performance period (2015-2017). (Messrs. Beck and Dreyer and Ms. Izurieta had not yet joined the Company at the time of grant in 2015.) Similar to the 2017 PRSUs described above: (i) 50% of the award was subject to the Company’s TSR performance relative to peers, and (ii) 50% of the award was subject to the Company’s ROE (funding threshold) and Selected Fee Income performance.

Upon completion of the performance period, the Compensation Committee determined that: (i) the Company’s relative TSR performance ranked in the first position against the applicable 2015 peer group (of 17 companies), and (ii) the 5% minimum ROE funding threshold was met, and the Company achieved 106%, 98% and 95% of its Selected Fee Income targets for 2015, 2016 and 2017, respectively. Consequently, the committee determined that 125% of the target PRSU awards were earned. The awards were also subject to a brief time-based vesting requirement, and were fully vested as of January 30, 2018.

1 TSR is measured based on the average closing stock price for the last two months of the applicable performance period and the average closing stock price for the two months immediately preceding the performance period, with dividends reinvested.

40

LOGO

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS & COMPENSATION

Compensation Discussion & Analysis


Other Compensation for CFO

When Mr. Beck joined the Company in June 2017 as Chief Financial Officer, he received the following as part of his compensation: (i) an equity award for 2017 with a value of approximately $650,000, of which 75% was in the form of restricted stock unitunits and 25% in the form of stock options, all of which are subject to4-year time-based vesting; (ii) aone-time new hire equity award of approximately $300,000 in the form of restricted stock units, which is also subject to a 4-year time-based vesting; and (iii) aone-time new hire cash award of $300,000, which is subject to repayment if his employment is terminated in certain circumstances within1-year of his start date.

EXECUTIVE BENEFITSAND OTHER EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION-RELATED MATTERS

Executive Benefits

Employee Retirement Benefits

Our NEOs are eligible to participate in our SVB Financial Group 401(k) (“401(k) Plan”) and Employee Stock Ownership Plan (“ESOP”), our combined qualified retirement and profit sharing plan that is generally available to all of the Company’s U.S. employees. Our NEOs participate in the plan on the same terms as all other eligible employees. Other than our 401(k) Plan, we do not provide any pension, excess retirement or supplemental executive retirement (“SERP”) to our NEOs.

Under our 401(k) Plan, our U.S. employees, including our NEOs, may make voluntarypre-tax and/or traditional/Rothpost-tax deferrals up to the maximum provided for by IRS regulations. The Company providesdollar-for-dollar matching contributions up to a maximum of 5% of cash compensation or the Internal Revenue Section 401(a) compensation limit, whichever is less. Company 401(k) matching contributions vest immediately upon deposit into the individual’s 401(k) account.

The plan also includes a profit sharing component. Under the ESOP, we may make discretionary annual contributions for U.S. employees, as determined by the Compensation Committee. ESOP contributions may be in the form of cash, the Company’s common stock or a combination of both, and are subject to certain vesting conditions. Contributions are determined based on the Company’s performance and are not adjusted to reflect individual performance.

Similar to 2016, for 2017, the Compensation Committee established performance criteria based on the Company’s adjusted ROE against budget (same as the calculation of 2/3 of the total ICP pool) to fund the ESOP contribution, and set the funding level to 1.25% of eligible compensation based on target ROE performance. Despite a higher allowable maximum under the ESOP, the Compensation Committee has committed to a funding maximum of 5%. Based on the Company’s 2017 above-target ROE performance, the Compensation Committee approved a contribution of 1.63% of eligible compensation in cash (50%) and the Company’s common stock (50%) for all eligible participants.

Deferred Compensation

We do not provide NEOs with any Company-funded deferred compensation benefits. However, in order to help them achieve their retirement objectives, we offer each NEO the opportunity totax-defer a portion of their income, beyond what is allowed to be deferred in the Company’s qualified retirement plan. Specifically, under our DCP, each individual may defer 5% to 50% of their base pay and 5% to 100% of eligible incentive payments during each plan year. The DCP is an unfunded plan, and participating executives bear the risk of forfeiture in the event that we cannot fund DCP liabilities. We do not match executive deferrals to the DCP, nor do we make any other contributions to the DCP. See “Compensation for Named ExecutiveOfficers—Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation”below.

We establish and maintain a bookkeeping account for each participant that reflects compensation deferrals made by the executive along with any associated earnings, expenses, gains and losses. The amount in a participant’s account is adjusted for hypothetical investment earnings or losses in an amount equivalent to the gains or losses reported by the investment options selected by the participant from among the investment options designated for this purpose by the Company. A participant may, in accordance with rules and procedures we establish, change the investments to be used for the purpose of calculating future hypothetical investment adjustments to the participant’s account. The account of each participant is adjusted each business day to reflect: (a) the hypothetical investment earnings and/or losses described above; (b) participant deferrals; and (c) distributions or withdrawals from the account. Distributions or withdrawals from the DCP shall be made in full accordance with the requirements of Internal Revenue Code Section 409A. Among the NEOs, Mr. Becker and Ms. Izurieta are participants in the plan. Mr. Becker received in January 2017 the first of five annual installments relating to certain compensation deferred in 2005.

41

LOGO

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS & COMPENSATION

Compensation Discussion & Analysis


Health and Welfare Benefits/Time Away From Work

Our NEOs are eligible to participate in our standard health and welfare benefits program, which provides medical, dental, life, accident and disability coverage to all of our eligible U.S.-based employees. We do not provide executives with any health and welfare benefits that are not generally available to other Company employees. Additionally, under our “time away from work” policy, U.S. exempt employees, including our NEOs, do not accrue vacation benefits. Rather, such employees are expected to manage their time away from work, subject to the demands and needs of their jobs.Non-exempt U.S. employees and othernon-U.S. employees continue to accrue vacation benefits formulaically.

Executive Termination Benefits

See “Compensation for Named Executive Officers—Other Post-Employment Payments”below.

Perquisites

We do not have any executive perquisite programs. Other than our executive Change in Control Plan, we do not have any special executive programs that offer benefits exclusively to our executives. Our executives receive the same retirement, health, welfare and other benefits that are generally available to our employees, and may also participate in certain programs that are available to members of senior management, such as our Deferred Compensation Plan. From time to time and on a limited basis, we may provide individual benefits deemed to be perquisites, which we generally believe serve, or are related to, a reasonable business-related or employment purpose.

Stock Option and Other Equity Practices

Grant Practices for Executive Officers

The Compensation Committee approved all equity grants in 2017 made to executive officers of the Company, except that the independent members of the Board approved equity grants made to the Chief Executive Officer based on the Compensation Committee’s recommendation. Except for certain awards that were intended to qualify as performance-based compensation under Section 162(m) of the Code (as defined below), annual equity compensation grants to executives are typically made effective during the second quarter of the year. Grants are made effective during an open trading window pursuant to our Insider Trading Policy, with limited exceptions. The exercise price for stock option grants is equal to the closing market price on the grant’s effective date and time-based grants typically have an annual vesting period of 4 years, subject to continued employment or service. All 2017 grants to our NEOs were made in accordance with this practice.

For newly-hired executive officers, the Compensation Committee approves an equity grant amount prior to, or shortly after, the executive’s start of employment, and the effective grant date is typically set during an open trading window after they commence employment. This approach ensures that the exercise price of stock options reflects a fair market price, since the exercise price for stock option grants is equal to the closing market price on the grant’s effective date.

Grant Practices for Other Employees

The Board has delegated authority to the Equity Awards Committee to make equity grants tonon-executive employees under our 2006 Equity Incentive Plan. The Equity Awards Committee is a committee of two, comprised of our Chief Executive Officer and the Chair of our Board. The Equity Awards Committee may not make equity grants to executives or anynon-executive employee that reports directly to the Chief Executive Officer. The Equity Awards Committee may make grants only within established individual employee and aggregate share limits and in accordance with established requirements regarding the term, vesting period, exercise price and other terms and conditions for the grant. In addition, all grants of stock options and restricted stock units made by the Equity Awards Committee must be made (or become effective) on the first Monday of the month following approval or, where the first Monday is a Company-observed U.S. holiday, on the first Tuesday of such month. The Equity Awards Committee approves grants on a quarterly basis, and must approve all grants in writing on or before the date of grant, subject to the respective employee remaining an employee as of the date of grant. Finally, management updates the Compensation Committee regarding all grants made by the Equity Awards Committee on a regular basis. Any grant that does not meet the requirements established for the Equity Awards Committee must be made by the Board, the Compensation Committee or other authorized committee.

42

LOGO

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS & COMPENSATION

Compensation Discussion & Analysis


The Compensation Committee typically approves annual grants to all eligible employees, as well as any other grants that the Equity Awards Committee is not authorized to approve.

Prohibitions Against Hedging

Pursuant to our Insider Trading Policy, our directors, executive officers (including our NEOs) and employees are not permitted to “hedge” ownership by selling puts in or selling short any of the Company’s publicly-traded securities at any time. Additionally, we discourage, and have not permitted, any of our executive officers to pledge, or use as collateral, our securities to secure personal loans or other obligations.

Employment Agreements

Except as required by law, we do not have any individual employment agreements for our executives. None of our NEOs have an employment agreement.

Compensation Recovery Policies

Except as noted below, our Compensation Committee has not yet adopted a policy with respect to whether we will make retroactive adjustments to any cash or equity based incentive compensation paid to our NEOs or other employees where the payment was based on the achievement of financial results that were subsequently revised. In 2015, our Compensation Committee approved an amendment to our 2006 Equity Incentive Plan to provide that equity awards granted under the performance achievement2006 Equity Incentive Plan will be subject to the terms and conditions of any compensation recovery policy adopted by the Company and as may be in effect from time to time. The Compensation Committee also approved a similar amendment to the ICP as it relates to incentive awards under the plan. Generally, the topic of compensation recovery policies continues to be an area of consideration for the Compensation Committee, taking into account the Company’s compensation program, market practices and applicable regulatory developments.

Section 162(m)

Prior to the adoption of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (“TCJ Act”) in late 2017, Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”) limited our deductibility of compensation paid to our CEO and each of the next 3 most highly compensated executive officers (excluding the Chief Financial Officer) in excess of $1,000,000, but excluded “performance-based compensation” from this limit. However, under the TCJ Act, effective for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017, the exemption for “performance-based compensation” has been repealed, such that compensation paid to our covered executive officers (including our Chief Financial Officer) will no longer be deductible to the extent it exceeds $1,000,000, unless it qualifies for transition relief applicable to certain arrangements in place as of November 2, 2017. The 2017 stock options and executives’ PRSU awardswere designed to qualify as “performance-based compensation” for purposes of Section 162(m), but because of the uncertainties relating to the transition relief, no assurances can be given as to whether such awards will qualify as “performance-based compensation” exempt from the $1,000,000 deductibility limit.

43

LOGO

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS & COMPENSATION

Compensation Discussion & Analysis


Equity Ownership Guidelines for Executive Officers

The Company maintains stock ownership guidelines for the Company’s executive officers, including the NEOs. These stock ownership guidelines reflect the Board’s belief in the importance of aligning the economic interests of stockholders and management. The Compensation Committee is responsible for setting and periodically reviewing the guidelines. Guidelines for each executive position are determined based on factors including the executive role, scope of responsibilities, base salary levels, Company stock price performance and market data. The current equity ownership guidelines applicable to executive officers are based on the value of the Company’s common stock as a percentage of annual base salary, as follows:

Position

Stock Value as Percentage of Annual Base Salary

Chief Executive Officer

600%

President of Silicon Valley Bank400%

Chief Credit Officer

Chief Financial Officer

Chief Operations Officer

Chief Risk Officer

Head of EMEA/President UK Branch

Head of Technology Banking

300%

Chief Human Resources Officer

Chief Information Officer

Chief Marketing Officer

General Counsel

200%

There were no changes to the guidelines in 2017, other than establishing a new guideline for the role of the President of Silicon Valley Bank.

All executive officers have 5 years from the date on which they become an executive officer to attain the minimum level of ownership.

The Governance Committee monitors compliance with these guidelines and reviews executive equity holdings on a quarterly basis. In evaluating whether executives are meeting the ownership guidelines, the Governance Committee considers the following as shares owned: (1) shares actually held, (2) shares owned through investment in the Company’s stock fund in the SVB Financial Group 401(k) and Employee Stock Ownership Plan, and (3) earned but unvested awards of restricted stock awards and restricted stock units (subject to either time-based or performance-based vesting). Neither vested nor unvested stock options count towards the ownership guidelines. Exceptions to meeting the guidelines due to personal financial or other reasons are reviewed and determined by the Governance Committee.

As of December 31, 2017, all of our NEOs were in compliance with the applicable ownership guidelines or otherwise expected to achieve the requisite ownership levels within the designated 5 year time-frame.

44

LOGO

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS & COMPENSATION

Compensation Discussion & Analysis


Compensation for Named Executive Officers

SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE

The following table sets forth the compensation paid to our NEOs for the 2015-2017 performance period based uponyears ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively:

 Name and Principal Position

   Year    Salary
    ($)       
  Bonus
  ($) (1)  
  Stock
Awards
    ($) (2)    
  Stock
Option
Awards
  ($) (2)  
  Non-Equity
Incentive  Plan
Compensation
        ($) (3)        
  All Other
Compensation
        ($) (4)        
  Total
       ($)        
 

Greg Becker

President and Chief

Executive Officer

  2017   945,673     -     2,774,296     926,248     1,435,000     25,494     6,106,711  
 

 

 

 

2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

925,904  

 

 

 

 

 

 

-  

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,225,746  

 

 

 

 

 

 

807,501  

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,148,750  

 

 

 

 

 

 

17,879  

 

 

 

 

 

 

5,125,780 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

912,333  

 

 

 

 

 

 

-  

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,092,890  

 

 

 

 

 

 

670,964  

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,225,000  

 

 

 

 

 

 

25,947  

 

 

 

 

 

 

4,927,134 

 

 

 

Dan Beck

Chief Financial Officer

 

 

 

 

2017

 

 

 

 

 

 

302,885  

 

 

 

 

 

 

300,000  

 

 

 

 

 

 

749,654  

 

 

 

 

 

 

161,829  

 

 

 

 

 

 

325,000  

 

 

 

 

 

 

4,938  

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,844,306 

 

 

        

 

Michael Descheneaux (5)

President, Silicon Valley

Bank (former CFO)

 

 

 

 

2017

 

 

 

 

 

 

682,692  

 

 

 

 

 

 

-  

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,155,820  

 

 

 

 

 

 

385,917  

 

 

 

 

 

 

965,000  

 

 

 

 

 

 

18,559  

 

 

 

 

 

 

3,207,988 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

602,308  

 

 

 

 

 

 

-  

 

 

 

 

 

 

861,541  

 

 

 

 

 

 

312,566  

 

 

 

 

 

 

625,000  

 

 

 

 

 

 

53,977  

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,455,392 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

592,885  

 

 

 

 

 

 

-  

 

 

 

 

 

 

837,104  

 

 

 

 

 

 

268,394  

 

 

 

 

 

 

575,000  

 

 

 

 

 

 

22,508  

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,295,891 

 

 

 

John China

Head of Technology Banking

 

 

 

 

2017

 

 

 

 

 

 

520,673  

 

 

 

 

 

 

-  

 

 

 

 

 

 

693,529  

 

 

 

 

 

 

231,562  

 

 

 

 

 

 

650,000  

 

 

 

 

 

 

19,597  

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,115,361 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

498,385  

 

 

 

 

 

 

-  

 

 

 

 

 

 

538,395  

 

 

 

 

 

 

195,346  

 

 

 

 

 

 

525,000  

 

 

 

 

 

 

19,424  

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,776,550 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

479,308  

 

 

 

 

 

 

-  

 

 

 

 

 

 

456,520  

 

 

 

 

 

 

146,366  

 

 

 

 

 

 

525,000  

 

 

 

 

 

 

24,383  

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,631,577 

 

 

 

Michael Dreyer

Chief Operations Officer

 

 

 

 

2017

 

 

 

 

 

 

491,346  

 

 

 

 

 

 

-  

 

 

 

 

 

 

616,331  

 

 

 

 

 

 

205,788  

 

 

 

 

 

 

575,000  

 

 

 

 

 

 

19,181  

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,907,646 

 

 

        

 

Laura Izurieta

Chief Risk Officer

 

 

 

 

2017

 

 

 

 

 

 

484,423  

 

 

 

 

 

 

-  

 

 

 

 

 

 

500,618  

 

 

 

 

 

 

167,213  

 

 

 

 

 

 

500,000  

 

 

 

 

 

 

21,748  

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,674,002 

 

 

        

(1)     For Mr. Beck, the performance criteria presented under “Compensation Discussion and Analysis-Equity Incentives” above.amount reflects a signing bonus paid following his hire in 2017.

(3)

The stock(2)     Values indicated for equity awards reported above reflect restricted stock unit awards granted to each NEO.

(4)

The exercise pricethe fair value of the stock option awards is reported in the table.

(5)

The fair values reported above are also reported in the “Summary Compensation Table” under the “Stock Awards” and “Stock Option Awards” columns. Amounts shown represent the grant date fair values of awards of stock options and stock awards granted ingrants made during the fiscal year indicated whichyear. Such values were computed in accordance with the Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718 Compensation (“ASC Topic 718”). The amounts disclosed may never be realized. Assumptions used in calculating these amounts are included in the note entitled “Stockholders’ EquityShare-based Compensationofin our audited financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form10-K for the applicable year. The amounts disclosed under the “Stock Awards” column also include the fair value of grants of certain performance-based restricted stock unit awards reported based on achievement at target level. The aggregate maximum fair value of such awards, assuming the highest level of achievement of the performance conditions, is 150% of the target level. For details of 2017 grants, see “Grants of Plan-Based Awards” below.

(3)     Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation is comprised of ICP Payments for each executive.

(4)     The following table provides the amounts of other compensation, including perquisites, paid to, or on behalf of, our NEOs during 2017 included in the “All Other Compensation” column. Perquisites and other personal benefits are valued on the basis of the aggregate incremental cost to the Company.

   Greg
Becker
  Dan
Beck
  Michael
Descheneaux
  John
China
  Michael
Dreyer
   Laura
Izurieta
 

Imputed Income Tax Reimbursement (a)

    $7,569      $32      $562      $1,672      $1,232       $3,809   

ESOP

   4,401     4,401     4,401     4,401     4,401      4,401   

401(k) Match

   13,524     505     13,596     13,524     13,548      13,538   
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

    $    25,494      $    4,938      $    18,559      $    19,597      $    19,181       $    21,748   
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

(a)

Amounts represent reimbursement payments of income taxes incurred by our NEOs on imputed income. For 2017, such imputed income was primarily associated with spousal travel and attendance to our business events where our NEOs’ spouses or significant others were invited, and expected, to attend, and our relocation program.

(5)     In June 2017, Mr. Descheneaux, former Chief Financial Officer, was promoted to President, Silicon Valley Bank.

45

LOGO

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS & COMPENSATION

Compensation for NEOs


GRANTSOF PLAN-BASED AWARDS

The following table sets forth all plan-based awards, including equity awards andnon-equity incentive awards, made to our NEOs during the year ended December 31, 2017.

  Grant Date Compensation
Committee or
Board Approval
Date
 Estimated Future Payouts Under
Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards
(1)
  Estimated Future Payouts Under
Equity Incentive Plan Awards
(2)
  All Other
Stock
Awards;
Number of
Shares of
Stock or
Units (3)
  All Other
Option
Awards;
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Options
  Exercise
or Base
Price of
Option
Awards
  Grant Date
Fair Value
of Stock and
Option
Awards

(4)
 
Name   

 

Threshold
($)

  

 

Target ($)

  

 

Maximum
($)

  

 

Threshold
(#)

  

 

Target
(#)

  

 

Maximum
(#)

     

Greg Becker

 January 26, 2017 January 26, 2017  -     950,000     -     -     -     -     -     -     -     -   
 February 21, 2017 February 21, 2017  -     -     -     5,056     10,112     15,168     -     -     -     1,892,157   
 May 2, 2017 February 21, 2017  -     -     -     -     -     -     4,945     -     -     882,139   
 May 2, 2017 February 21, 2017  -     -     -     -     -     -     -     15,920     178.39     926,248   

Dan Beck

 June 5, 2017 April 26, 2017  -     367,500     -     -     -     -     -     -     -     -   
 June 5, 2017 May 5, 2017  -     -     -     -     -     -     4,423     -     -     749,654   
 June 5, 2017 May 5, 2017  -     -     -     -     -     -     -     2,939     169.49     161,829   

Michael Descheneaux

 January 25, 2017 January 25, 2017  -     630,000     -     -     -     -     -     -     -     -   
 February 21, 2017 February 7, 2017  -     -     -     2,106     4,213     6,319     -     -     -     788,337   
 May 2, 2017 February 7, 2017  -     -     -     -     -     -     2,060     -     -     367,483   
 May 2, 2017 February 7, 2017  -     -     -     -     -     -     -     6,633     178.39     385,917   

John China

 January 25, 2017 January 25, 2017  -     420,000     -     -     -     -     -     -     -     -   
 February 21, 2017 February 7, 2017  -     -     -     1,264     2,528     3,792     -     -     -     473,039   
 May 2, 2017 February 7, 2017  -     -     -     -     -     -     1,236     -     -     220,490   
 May 2, 2017 February 7, 2017  -     -     -     -     -     -     -     3,980     178.39     231,562   

Michael Dreyer

 January 25, 2017 January 25, 2017  -     400,000     -     -     -     -     -     -     -     -   
 February 21, 2017 February 7, 2017  -     -     -     1,123     2,247     3,370     -     -     -     420,459   
 May 2, 2017 February 7, 2017  -     -     -     -     -     -     1,098     -     -     195,872   
 May 2, 2017 February 7, 2017  -     -     -     -     -     -     -     3,537     178.39     205,788   

Laura Izurieta

 January 25, 2017 January 25, 2017  -     300,000     -     -     -     -     -     -     -     -   
 February 21, 2017 February 7, 2017  -     -     -     912     1,825     2,737     -     -     -     341,494   
 May 2, 2017 February 7, 2017  -     -     -     -     -     -     892     -     -     159,124   
 May 2, 2017 February 7, 2017  -     -     -     -     -     -     -     2,874     178.39     167,213   

(1)

The ICP amounts represent target levels. There are no individual thresholds or maximum amounts.

Option Exercises and Stock Vested

The following table sets forth the number of securities underlying equity awards that vested (in the case of restricted shares) or were exercised (in the case of stock options) by the NEOs during the year ended December 31, 2015, and the value realized upon such vesting or exercise.

   OPTION AWARDS   STOCK AWARDS 

Name

  Number of
Shares
Acquired on
Exercise
   Value Realized
on Exercise
   Number of
Shares
Acquired on
Vesting
   Value Realized
on Vesting
 

Greg Becker

   42,962      $3,102,893       39,758      $4,980,320    

Michael Descheneaux

   17,767       1,286,517       11,444       1,406,322    

John China

   2,064       158,381       5,679       694,038    

Joan Parsons

   -       -       6,342       779,882    

Bruce Wallace

   8,836       548,706       6,042       741,358    
(2)

For the performance-based restricted stock unit grants to the NEOs made in 2017, the performance achievement will be determined as of December 31, 2019 for the 2017-2019 performance period based upon the performance criteria presented under “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Equity Incentives” above.

(3)

The stock awards reported reflect restricted stock unit awards granted to each NEO.

(4)

The fair values reported above are also reported in the “Summary Compensation Table” under the “Stock Awards” and “Stock Option Awards” columns. Amounts shown represent the grant date fair values of stock options and stock awards granted in the fiscal year indicated, which were computed in accordance with ASC Topic 718. The amounts disclosed may never be realized. Assumptions used in calculating these amounts are included in the note entitled “Share-based Compensation” of our audited financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form10-K for the applicable year.

OPTION EXERCISESAND STOCK VESTED

The following table sets forth the number of securities underlying equity awards that vested (in the case of restricted stock) or were exercised (in the case of stock options) by the NEOs during the year ended December 31, 2017, and the value realized upon such vesting or exercise.

   OPTION AWARDS   STOCK AWARDS 

Name

  Number of
Shares
Acquired on
Exercise
   Value Realized
on Exercise
   Number of
Shares
Acquired on
Vesting
   Value Realized
on Vesting
 

Greg Becker

   33,405       $        4,729,537      16,660       $        2,943,156   

Dan Beck

   -      -      -      -   

Michael Descheneaux

   21,375      2,449,471      7,437      1,314,387   

John China

   152      26,881      4,219      746,123   

Michael Dreyer

   -      -      2,774      566,926   

Laura lzurieta

   -      -      921      158,900   

 

46

LOGO     EXECUTIVE OFFICERS & COMPENSATION


Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year End

The following tables set forth all outstanding equity awards to the NEOs as of December 31, 2015. The exercise price for each of the stock option grants reported below is equal to the closing market price on the grant date. The vesting schedule for each outstanding equity award is provided in the footnotes to the tables below. Outstanding stock awards are valued based upon the closing market price of our stock as of December 31, 2015, which was $118.90
LOGO

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS & COMPENSATION

Compensation for NEOs


OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDSAT FISCAL YEAR END

The following tables set forth all outstanding equity awards to the NEOs as of December 31, 2017. The exercise price for each of the stock option grants reported below is equal to the closing market price on the applicable grant date. The vesting schedule for each outstanding equity award is provided in the footnotes to the table below. Outstanding stock awards are valued based upon the closing market price of our stock as of December 29, 2017, which was $233.77 per share.

  OPTION AWARDS  STOCK AWARDS 

Name

 Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
(# Exercisable)
  Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
(# Unexercisable)
  Equity
Incentive Plan
Awards;
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Unearned
Options
  Option
Exercise
Price
(per option)
  Option
Expiration Date
  Number of
Shares or
Units of
Stock
That Have
Not
Vested
  Market
Value of
Shares or
Units of
Stock That
Have Not
Vested
  Equity
Incentive Plan
Awards;
Number of
Unearned
Shares, Units
or Other
Rights That
Have Not
Vested
  Equity
Incentive Plan
Awards;
Market or
Payout Value
of Unearned
Shares, Units,
or Other Rights
That Have Not
Vested
 

Greg Becker

  13,894    -         $      60.37    April 27, 2018             1,300  (5)  $154,570   
  12,486    7,025  (1)       64.37    May 1, 2019             4,400  (6)   523,160   
  13,028    15,800  (2)       71.11    April 30, 2020             3,024  (7)   359,554   
  6,086    18,257  (3)       107.98    April 29, 2021             5,371  (8)   638,612   
      16,237  (4)       129.81    May 1, 2022             10,281  (9)     1,222,411   
               16,500  (10)   1,961,850   

 

(1)
  OPTION AWARDS  STOCK AWARDS 
Name Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
(# Exercisable)
  Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
(# Unexercisable)
    Equity
Incentive
Plan Awards;
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Unearned
Options
  Option
Exercise Price
(per option)
  Option
Expiration Date
  Number of
Shares or
Units of
Stock That
Have Not
Vested
  Market Value
of Shares or
Units of Stock
That Have
Not Vested
  Equity Incentive
Plan Awards;
Number of
Unearned
Shares, Units or
Other Rights
That Have Not
Vested
  Equity Incentive
Plan Awards;
Market or
Payout Value of
Unearned
Shares, Units,
or Other Rights
That Have Not
Vested

Greg Becker

  28,828     -        $71.11     April 30, 2020         1,008  (1)  $235,640  
  18,258     6,085  (1)       107.98     April 29, 2021         2,685  (2)   627,672 
  8,119     8,118  (2)       129.81     May 1, 2022         5,483  (3)   1,281,761 
  6,238     18,713  (3)       105.18     May 2, 2023         4,945  (4)   1,155,993 
  -     15,920  (4)       178.39     May 2, 2024         16,500  (5)   3,857,205 
          24,999  (6)   5,844,016 
          15,168  (7)   3,545,823 

Dan Beck

  -     2,939  (8)      $169.49     June 5, 2024         4,423  (8)  $1,033,965 

Michael Descheneaux

  11,325     -        $71.11     April 30, 2020         443  (1)  $103,560 
  8,034     2,677  (1)       107.98     April 29, 2021         1,074  (2)   251,069 
  3,248     3,247  (2)       129.81     May 1, 2022         2,122  (3)   496,060 
  2,415     7,243  (3)       105.18     May 2, 2023         2,060  (4)   481,566 
  -     6,633  (4)       178.39     May 2, 2024         6,600  (5)   1,542,882 
          9,676  (6)   2,261,959 
          6,319  (7)   1,477,193 

John China

  6,600     -        $64.37     May 1, 2019         241  (1)  $56,339 
  8,600     -         71.11     April 30, 2020         585  (2)   136,755 
  4,382     1,460  (1)       107.98     April 29, 2021         1,326  (3)   309,979 
  1,772     1,770  (2)       129.81     May 1, 2022         1,236  (4)   288,940 
  1,509     4,527  (3)       105.18     May 2, 2023         3,600  (5)   841,572 
  -     3,980  (4)       178.39     May 2, 2024         6,048  (6)   1,413,841 
          3,792  (7)   886,456 

Michael Dreyer

  -     3,537  (4)      $178.39     May 2, 2024         4,032  (9)  $        942,561 
          2,272  (10)   531,125 
          1,098  (4)   256,679 
          3,370  (7)   787,805 

Laura Izurieta

  -     2,874  (4)      $        178.39     May 2, 2024         2,762  (11)  $645,673 
          892  (4)   208,523 
          2,737  (7)   639,828 

7,025 options scheduled to vest on May 1, 2016.

(1)

Options and awards scheduled to vest on April 29, 2018.

(2)

Options and awards scheduled to vest with respect toone-half of the underlying shares on each of May 1, 2018 and 2019, respectively.

(3)

Options and awards scheduled to vest with respect toone-third of the underlying shares on each of May 2, 2018, 2019 and 2020, respectively.

(4)

Options and awards scheduled to vest with respect toone-fourth of the underlying shares on each of May 2, 2018, 2019, 2020 and 2021, respectively.

(5)

Reflects performance-based restricted stock units scheduled to vest on January 30, 2018, assuming maximum award at 150% of target. Following the fiscalyear-end, the actual shares earned pursuant to these awards were determined to be 125% of target.

(6)

Performance-based restricted stock units scheduled to vest on January 30, 2019, assuming maximum award at 150% of target.

(7)

Performance-based restricted stock units scheduled to vest on January 30, 2020, assuming maximum award at 150% of target.

(8)

Options and awards scheduled to vest with respect toone-fourth of the underlying shares on each of June 5, 2018, 2019, 2020 and 2021, respectively.

(9)

Restricted stock units scheduled to vest with respect toone-half of the underlying shares on each of November 12, 2018 and 2019, respectively.

(10)

Restricted stock units scheduled to vest with respect toone-third of the underlying shares on each of August 1, 2018, 2019 and 2020, respectively.

(11)

Restricted stock units scheduled to vest with respect toone-third of the underlying shares on each of September 1, 2018, 2019 and 2020, respectively.

(2)

7,900 options scheduled to vest on April 30, 2016 and 7,900 options scheduled to vest on April 30, 2017.

(3)

6,086 options scheduled to vest on April 29, 2016; 6,086 options scheduled to vest on April 29, 2017; and 6,085 options scheduled to vest on April 29, 2018.

(4)

4,060 options scheduled to vest on May 1, 2016; 4,059 options scheduled to vest on May 1, 2017; 4,059 options scheduled to vest on May 1, 2018; and 4,059 options scheduled to vest on May 1, 2019.

(5)

1,300 restricted stock units scheduled to vest on May 1, 2016.

(6)

2,200 restricted stock units scheduled to vest on April 30, 2016 and 2,200 restricted stock units scheduled to vest on April 30, 2017.

(7)

1,008 restricted stock units scheduled to vest on April 29, 2016; 1,008 restricted stock units scheduled to vest on April 29, 2017; and 1,008 restricted stock units scheduled to vest on April 29, 2018.

(8)

1,343 restricted stock units scheduled to vest on May 1, 2016; 1,343 restricted stock units scheduled to vest on May 1, 2017; 1,343 restricted stock units scheduled to vest on May 1, 2018; and 1,342 restricted stock units scheduled to vest on May 1, 2019.

(9)

10,281 performance-based restricted stock units scheduled to vest on January 30, 2017 (maximum of 150% of target).

(10)

16,500 performance-based restricted stock units scheduled to vest on January 30, 2018 (maximum of 150% of target).

  OPTION AWARDS  STOCK AWARDS 

Name

 Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
(# Exercisable)
  Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
(# Unexercisable)
  Equity Incentive
Plan Awards;
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Unearned
Options
  Option
Exercise
Price
(per option)
  Option
Expiration Date
  Number of
Shares or
Units of
Stock

That Have
Not
Vested
  Market
Value of
Shares or
Units of
Stock
That
Have Not
Vested
  Equity
Incentive Plan
Awards;
Number of
Unearned
Shares, Units
or Other
Rights That
Have Not
Vested
  Equity
Incentive Plan
Awards;
Market or
Payout Value
of Unearned
Shares, Units,
or Other Rights
That Have Not
Vested
 

Michael Descheneaux

  2,500    -         $      45.19    July 27, 2017             775  (5)  $92,148   
  8,000    -          60.37    April 27, 2018             2,450  (6)     291,305   
  9,050    4,350  (1)       64.37    May 1, 2019             1,330  (7)   158,137   
  6,650    8,650  (2)       71.11    April 30, 2020             2,148  (8)   255,397   
  2,678    8,033  (3)       107.98    April 29, 2021             4,524  (9)   537,904   
      6,495  (4)       129.81    May 1, 2022             6,600  (10)   784,740   

(1)

4,350 options scheduled to vest on May 1, 2016.

(2)

4,325 options scheduled to vest on April 30, 2016 and 4,325 options scheduled to vest on April 30, 2017.

(3)

2,678 options scheduled to vest on April 29, 2016; 2,678 options scheduled to vest on April 29, 2017; and 2,677 options scheduled to vest on April 29, 2018.

(4)

1,624 options scheduled to vest on May 1, 2016; 1,624 options scheduled to vest on May 1, 2017; 1,624 options scheduled to vest on May 1, 2018; and 1,623 options scheduled to vest on May 1, 2019.

(5)

775 restricted stock units scheduled to vest on May 1, 2016.

(6)

1,225 restricted stock units scheduled to vest on April 30, 2016 and 1,225 restricted stock units scheduled to vest on April 30, 2017.

(7)

444 restricted stock units scheduled to vest on April 29, 2016; 443 restricted stock units scheduled to vest on April 29, 2017; and 443 restricted stock units scheduled to vest on April 29, 2018.

(8)

537 restricted stock units scheduled to vest on May 1, 2016; 537 restricted stock units scheduled to vest on May 1, 2017; 537 restricted stock units scheduled to vest on May 1, 2018; and 537 restricted stock units scheduled to vest on May 1, 2019.

(9)

4,524 performance-based restricted stock units scheduled to vest on January 30, 2017 (maximum of 150% of target).

(10)

6,600 performance-based restricted stock units scheduled to vest on January 30, 2018 (maximum of 150% of target).

 

47

LOGO     EXECUTIVE OFFICERS & COMPENSATION


  OPTION AWARDS  STOCK AWARDS 

Name

 Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
(# Exercisable)
  Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
(# Unexercisable)
  Equity
Incentive
Plan Awards;
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Unearned
Options
  Option
Exercise
Price
(per option)
  Option
Expiration Date
  Number of
Shares or
Units of
Stock
That Have
Not
Vested
  Market
Value of
Shares or
Units of
Stock
That
Have Not
Vested
  Equity
Incentive
Plan Awards;
Number of
Unearned
Shares, Units or
Other Rights

That Have Not
Vested
  Equity Incentive
Plan Awards;
Market or
Payout Value

of Unearned
Shares, Units, or
Other Rights
That Have
Not Vested
 

John China

  3,704    -      -     $19.48      April 28, 2016    -      -      300  (5)  $35,670   
  2,500    -      -      49.18      April 30, 2017    -      -      1,550  (6)   184,295   
  2,520    -      -      54.88      January 3, 2018    -      -      725  (7)   86,203   
  4,950    1,650  (1)   -      64.37      May 1, 2019    -      -      1,171  (8)   139,232   
  4,300    4,300  (2)   -      71.11      April 30, 2020    -      -      2,467  (9)   293,326   
  1,461    4,381  (3)   -      107.98      April 29, 2021    -      -      3,600  (10)     428,040   
  -    3,542  (4)   -        129.81      May 1, 2022      
LOGO

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS & COMPENSATION

Compensation for NEOs

 


PENSION BENEFITS

We do not maintain any defined benefit pension plans in which any of our executive officers participate.

NON-QUALIFIED DEFERRED COMPENSATION

The following table sets forth information about executive contributions to, earnings from, and distributions ofnon-qualified deferred compensation under our Deferred Compensation Plan. There were no above-market or preferential earnings on any compensation that was deferred. We do not maintain any othernon-qualified deferred compensation program for our NEOs.

  Name

  Executive
Contributions in
Last FY (1)
   Registrant
Contributions in
Last FY (1)
   Aggregate
Earnings in
Last FY (1)
   Aggregate
Withdrawals/
Distributions

(1)
   Aggregate
Balance at Last
December 31,
2017 (1)
 

 Greg Becker (2)

 

  $

 

-  

 

 

 

  $

 

                    -  

 

 

 

  $

 

33,790  

 

 

 

  $

 

            37,951  

 

 

 

  $

 

182,421 

 

 

 

 Dan Beck

 

   

 

-  

 

 

 

   

 

-  

 

 

 

   

 

-  

 

 

 

   

 

-  

 

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

 Michael Descheneaux

 

   

 

-  

 

 

 

   

 

-  

 

 

 

   

 

-  

 

 

 

   

 

-  

 

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

 John China

 

   

 

-  

 

 

 

   

 

-  

 

 

 

   

 

-  

 

 

 

   

 

-  

 

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

 Michael Dreyer

 

   

 

-  

 

 

 

   

 

-  

 

 

 

   

 

-  

 

 

 

   

 

-  

 

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

 Laura Izurieta (3)

 

  $

 

            46,692  

 

 

 

   

 

-  

 

 

 

  $

 

        4,152  

 

 

 

   

 

-  

 

 

 

  $

 

            50,844 

 

 

 

 

(1)

1,650 options scheduled to vest on May 1, 2016.

(2)

2,150 options scheduled to vest on April 30, 2016 and 2,150 options scheduled to vest on April 30, 2017.

(3)

1,461 options scheduled to vest on April 29, 2016; 1,460 options scheduled to vest on April 29, 2017; and 1,460 options scheduled to vest on April 29, 2018.

(4)

886 options scheduled to vest on May 1, 2016; 886 options scheduled to vest on May 1, 2017; 885 options scheduled to vest on May 1, 2018; and 885 options scheduled to vest on May 1, 2019.

(5)

300 restricted stock units scheduled to vest on May 1, 2016.

(6)

775 restricted stock units scheduled to vest on April 30, 2016 and 775 restricted stock units scheduled to vest on April 30, 2017.

(7)

242 restricted stock units scheduled to vest on April 29, 2016; 242 restricted stock units scheduled to vest on April 29, 2017; and 241 restricted stock units scheduled to vest on April 29, 2018.

(8)

293 restricted stock units scheduled to vest on May 1, 2016; 293 restricted stock units scheduled to vest on May 1, 2017; 293 restricted stock units scheduled to vest on May 1, 2018; and 292 restricted stock units scheduled to vest on May 1, 2019.

(9)

2,467 performance-based restricted stock units scheduled to vest on January 30, 2017 (maximum of 150% of target).

(10)

3,600 performance-based restricted stock units scheduled to vest on January 30, 2018 (maximum of 150% of target).

  OPTION AWARDS  STOCK AWARDS 

Name

 Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
(# Exercisable)
  Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
(# Unexercisable)
  Equity
Incentive
Plan Awards;
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Unearned
Options
  Option
Exercise
Price
(per option)
  Option
Expiration Date
  Number of
Shares or
Units of
Stock
That Have
Not
Vested
  Market
Value of
Shares or
Units of
Stock
That
Have Not
Vested
  Equity
Incentive
Plan Awards;
Number of
Unearned
Shares, Units or
Other Rights
That Have Not
Vested
  Equity Incentive
Plan Awards;
Market or
Payout Value
of Unearned
Shares, Units, or
Other Rights
That Have
Not Vested
 

Joan Parsons

  171    -      -     $43.53      October 26, 2017    -      -      425  (5)  $50,533   
  1,750    -      -      60.37      April 27, 2018    -      -      1,350  (6)   160,515   
  2,300    2,300  (1)   -      64.37      May 1, 2019    -      -      725  (7)   86,203   
  2,350    4,700  (2)   -      71.11      April 30, 2020    -      -      1,171  (8)   139,232   
  1,461    4,381  (3)   -      107.98      April 29, 2021    -      -      2,467  (9)   293,326   
  -    3,542  (4)   -      129.81      May 1, 2022    -      -      3,600  (10)     428,040   

(1)

2,300 options scheduled to vest on May 1, 2016.

(2)

2,350 options scheduled to vest on April 30, 2016 and 2,350 options scheduled to vest on April 30, 2017.

(3)

1,461 options scheduled to vest on April 29, 2016; 1,460 options scheduled to vest on April 29, 2017; and 1,460 options scheduled to vest on April 29, 2018.

(4)

886 options scheduled to vest on May 1, 2016; 886 options scheduled to vest on May 1, 2017; 885 options scheduled to vest on May 1, 2018; and 885 options scheduled to vest on May 1, 2019.

(5)

425 restricted stock units scheduled to vest on May 1, 2016.

(6)

675 restricted stock units scheduled to vest on April 30, 2016 and 675 restricted stock units scheduled to vest on April 30, 2017.

(7)

242 restricted stock units scheduled to vest on April 29, 2016; 242 restricted stock units scheduled to vest on April 29, 2017; and 241 restricted stock units scheduled to vest on April 29, 2018.

(8)

293 restricted stock units scheduled to vest on May 1, 2016; 293 restricted stock units scheduled to vest on May 1, 2017; 293 restricted stock units scheduled to vest on May 1, 2018; and 292 restricted stock units scheduled to vest on May 1, 2019.

(9)

2,467 performance-based restricted stock units scheduled to vest on January 30, 2017 (maximum of 150% of target).

(10)

3,600 performance-based restricted stock units scheduled to vest on January 30, 2018 (maximum of 150% of target).

48

LOGO     EXECUTIVE OFFICERS & COMPENSATION


  OPTION AWARDS  STOCK AWARDS 

Name

 Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
(# Exercisable)
  Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
(# Unexercisable)
  Equity
Incentive
Plan Awards;
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Unearned
Options
  Option
Exercise
Price
(per option)
  Option
Expiration Date
  Number of
Shares or
Units of
Stock
That Have
Not
Vested
  Market
Value of
Shares or
Units of
Stock
That
Have Not
Vested
  Equity
Incentive
Plan Awards;
Number of
Unearned
Shares, Units or
Other Rights
That Have Not
Vested
  Equity Incentive
Plan Awards;
Market or
Payout Value

of Unearned
Shares, Units, or
Other Rights

That Have
Not Vested
 

Bruce Wallace

  2,250    2,250  (1)   -     $64.37      May 1, 2019    -      -      400  (5)  $47,560   
  -    4,700  (2)   -      71.11      April 30, 2020    -      -      1,300  (6)   154,570   
  -    4,381  (3)   -      107.98      April 29, 2021    -      -      725  (7)   86,203   
  -    3,542  (4)   -      129.81      May 1, 2022    -      -      1,171  (8)   139,232   
       -      -      2,467  (9)   293,326   
       -      -      3,600  (10)     428,040   

(1)

2,250 options scheduled to vest on May 1, 2016.

(2)

2,350 options scheduled to vest on April 30, 2016 and 2,350 options scheduled to vest on April 30, 2017.

(3)

1,461 options scheduled to vest on April 29, 2016; 1,460 options scheduled to vest on April 29, 2017; and 1,460 options scheduled to vest on April 29, 2018.

(4)

886 options scheduled to vest on May 1, 2016; 886 options scheduled to vest on May 1, 2017; 885 options scheduled to vest on May 1, 2018; and 885 options scheduled to vest on May 1, 2019.

(5)

400 restricted stock units scheduled to vest on May 1, 2016.

(6)

650 restricted stock units scheduled to vest on April 30, 2016 and 650 restricted stock units scheduled to vest on April 30, 2017.

(7)

242 restricted stock units scheduled to vest on April 29, 2016; 242 restricted stock units scheduled to vest on April 29, 2017; and 241 restricted stock units scheduled to vest on April 29, 2018.

(8)

293 restricted stock units scheduled to vest on May 1, 2016; 293 restricted stock units scheduled to vest on May 1, 2017; 293 restricted stock units scheduled to vest on May 1, 2018; and 292 restricted stock units scheduled to vest on May 1, 2019.

(9)

2,467 performance-based restricted stock units scheduled to vest on January 30, 2017 (maximum of 150% of target).

(10)

3,600 performance-based restricted stock units scheduled to vest on January 30, 2018 (maximum of 150% of target).

Pension Benefits

We do not maintain any defined benefit pension plans in which any of our executive officers participate.

Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation

The following table sets forth information about executive contributions to, earnings from, and distributions of non-qualified deferred compensation under our Deferred Compensation Plan. There were no above-market or preferential earnings on any compensation that was deferred. We do not maintain any other non-qualified deferred compensation program for our NEOs.

Name

  Executive
Contributions
in Last FY
   Registrant
Contributions
in Last FY
   Aggregate
Earnings

in Last FY
  Aggregate
Withdrawals/
Distributions
   Aggregate
Balance at
December 31,
2015
 

Greg Becker (1)

   -       -      ($      1,131  -      $    171,890  

Michael Descheneaux

   -       -           -       -  

John China

   -       -           -       -  

Joan Parsons

   -       -           -       -  

Bruce Wallace

   -       -           -       -  

(1)

Mr. Becker participated in the Deferred Compensation Plan in 2005. No additional contributions were made during 2015. The amounts in the above table are not required to be, and are not, reflected in the Summary Compensation Table above.

Other Post-Employment Payments
(2)

Mr. Becker elected to participate in the Deferred Compensation Plan in 2005. No additional contributions were made during 2017.

(3)

Ms. Izurieta elected to participate in the Deferred Compensation Plan in 2017.

OTHER POST-EMPLOYMENT PAYMENTS

There are certain circumstances in which our NEOs may be entitled to post-employment payments, which are discussed in further detail below:

Change in Control Severance Plan

Our Change in Control Severance Plan (the “Change in Control Plan

Our Change in Control Plan,), as adopted in 2006 and amended from time to time, provides a specified severance benefit to our executive officers in the event their employment is involuntarily terminated or they resign from such employment for a “good reason” following a change in control of the Company. (GenerallyGenerally under the plan, “good reason” is defined as the occurrence of any of the following events without the covered employee’s written consent: (i) a material, involuntary reduction in responsibilities, authorities or functions, except in connection with a termination of employment for death, disability, retirement, fraud, misappropriation, embezzlement and other exclusions; (ii) a material reduction in base salary; (iii) a reduction in total compensation to less than 85% of the

49

LOGO     EXECUTIVE OFFICERS & COMPENSATION


amount provided for the last full calendar year; or (iv) a relocation of more than fifty (50)50 miles.) We adopted this plan in order to ensure that itsour executives remain incented to consider and, whereif it is determined by the Board or stockholders as appropriate,(as appropriate) to be in our best interests, to act diligently to promote a change in the control of the Company. The plan does not provide for any 280G excise taxgross-up provisions.

We did not make any amendments or changes to the plan in 2015.2017.

The plan provides for a cash severance payment equal to 300% of base salary and target ICP incentive for the Chief Executive Officer, 200% of base salary and target ICP incentive for certain executive officers, including the Chief Financial Officer,chief financial officer and the Bank’s President and the Chief Strategy Officer,president, and 100% of base salary and target ICP incentive for the other executive officers. In addition, it provides for up to 12 months of Company-paid COBRA medical, dental and vision coverage, full vesting of Company contributions totax-qualified retirement plans and certain outplacement services.

The circumstances that constitute a “Change“change in Control”control” are set forth in the Change in Control Plan. Generally, speaking, a Changechange in Controlcontrol includes a merger or consolidation, other than a merger or consolidation in which the owners of our voting securities own fifty percent (50%)50% or more of the voting securities of the surviving entity; a liquidation or dissolution or the closing of the sale or other disposition of all or substantially all of our assets; an acquisition by any person, directly or indirectly, of 50% or more of our voting securities; and an acquisition by any person, directly or indirectly, of 25% or more of our voting securities and, within twelve (12)12 months of the occurrence of such event, a change in the composition of the Board occurs as a result of which sixty percent (60%)60% or fewer of the directors are incumbent directors.

48

LOGO

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS & COMPENSATION

Compensation for NEOs


Our Change in Control Plan includes a number of restrictive covenants that govern the executives’ rights to receive benefits under the plan. Specifically,Generally, unless we provide otherwise in writing, the executive must not directly or indirectly engage in, have any ownership in or participate in the financing, operation, management or control of any person, firm, corporation or business that competes with us or our affiliates, or any of our customers or our affiliates for a period of (i) 18 months, with respect toin the case of the chief executive officer (ii) 12 months, forin the case of the chief financial officer and the Bank’s president and chief strategy officer, and(iii) six months, forin the case of most other covered executives. In addition, unless we provide otherwise in writing, the executive may not directly or indirectly solicit, recruit, or otherwise hire or attempt to hire any of our employees or cause any such person to leave his or her employment during the periods described in the previous sentence. Finally, the executive must execute a general release of claims in our favor covering all claims arising out of the executive’s involuntary termination of employment (as defined in the Change in Control Plan) and employment with us and our affiliates.

Any benefits payable to an executive under this Planplan are reduced by any severance benefits we may pay to that executive under any other policy, plan, program or arrangement, including our Group Severance Benefit Policy.

SVB Financial Group Severance Benefit Policy

Our Severance Benefit Policy provides severance pay and benefits to eligible employees who are involuntarily terminated from employment due to staff reduction, position elimination, closure of a business unit, organization restructuring or such other circumstances, as we deem appropriate for the payment of severance benefits. The policy is intended to promote our ability to modify itsour workforce and structure, while providing a reasonable level of certainty and job security to our employees. The policy covers all regular full-time or regularand part-time employees, including the NEOs.

The policySeverance Benefit Policy provides for a cash severance payment based on level of job.job-level. For NEOs, this benefit is equal to 6six weeks’ pay per year of service including apro-rata amount for each partial year worked, with a minimum benefit of 6six months’ pay and a maximum benefit of 1one year’s pay. In addition, under the policy, we continue to makeco-payments for COBRA medical, dental, and vision coverage during the severance pay period and pays for certainpay designated outplacement services provided by a Company-selected external vendor. Any benefits payable to an executive under this Policypolicy are reduced by any severance benefits we pay to that executive under any other policy, plan, program, or arrangement, including our Change in Control Plan discussed above.

2006 Equity Incentive Plan

Our 2006 Equity Incentive Plan, in which the NEOs participate, provides for full vesting of outstanding awards in the event of a change in control (as defined in the plan) of the Company in the event that a successor corporation does not assume or substitute an equivalent option or right for the original equity awards under the plans.plan. In addition, effective as of January 7, 2015, we amended the equity awards agreements under the plan to provide for certain vesting of outstanding awards upon the termination of a participant’s employment due to death or disability as follows: (i) full vesting of any outstanding stock option awards, restricted stock unit awards subject to time-based vesting, restricted stock awards and stock appreciation rights awards; and(ii) pro-rated vesting for any outstanding restricted stock unit awards subject to performance conditions based on the level of achievement of the applicable performance conditions as of the date of termination. These changes apply to all outstanding awards on a retrospective basis, as well as to any new grants made under the applicable amended form of award agreement on a prospective basis.

Certain Executive Severance Arrangements

 

50In connection with Mr. Descheneaux’s promotion to the role of President, Silicon Valley Bank during 2017, we provided Mr. Descheneaux with a limited severance arrangement. Under the arrangement, in the event Mr. Descheneaux is terminated other than for cause or by reason of his death or disability following the his appointment, but on or before July 1, 2019, he will be entitled to receive the greater of: (A) the direct cash amount he would be eligible to receive under the Company’s Severance Benefit Policy (and if applicable, the Company’s Change in Control Severance Plan) or (B) if the termination occurs on or after (i) the effectiveness of his appointment through December 31, 2017, a multiple of two times his annual base salary and incentive compensation; (ii) January 1, 2018 through July 1, 2018, a multiple of one andone-half times his base salary and incentive compensation; (iii) July 2, 2018 through December 31, 2018, a multiple of one times his base salary and incentive compensation; or (iv) January 1, 2019 through July 1, 2019, a multiple ofone-half times his base salary and incentive compensation, each as in effect at such time. Following July 1, 2019, Mr. Descheneaux will only be eligible to receive severance benefits in accordance with the plans, programs or policies of the Company as may be in effect from time to time.

LOGO     EXECUTIVE OFFICERS & COMPENSATION

49

LOGO

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS & COMPENSATION

Compensation for NEOs


Payments Upon Termination Of EmploymentPAYMENTSUPON TERMINATIONOF EMPLOYMENT

The following tables summarize the payments whichthat would be payable to our NEOs, as of December 31, 2015,2017, in the event of various termination scenarios, including voluntary resignation, involuntary termination for cause, involuntary termination (not for cause), involuntary termination for good reason or after a change in control, death and disability.

 

  GREG BECKER, PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER 

Compensation and Benefits

 Voluntary
Resignation
(including
Retirement)
  Involuntary
Termination
for Cause
  Involuntary
Termination
(Not for

Cause)
(1)
  Involuntary or for
Good Reason After
Change-in-Control

(2)
  Death  Disability 

Cash severance pay

   $-       $-       $910,000       $5,187,000           $-           $-        

Market value of vested, exercisable stock options (3)

  2,183,145      -      2,183,145      2,183,145          2,183,145          2,183,145        

Market value of unvested stock options which would vest (4)

  -      -      -      1,337,522          1,337,522          1,337,522        

Market value of unvested restricted stock which would vest (4)

  -      -      -      3,798,737  (5)    2,654,205  (6)    2,654,205  (6)  

Company-paid health benefits

  -      -      13,243      17,652          -          -        

Accelerated retirement plan vesting

  -      -      -      -          -          -        

Company-paid outplacement benefits

  -      -      20,000      20,000          -          -        

Deferred Compensation Plan balance payable (7)

  171,890      171,890      171,890      171,890         171,890         171,890       
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

TOTAL

   $  2,355,035       $  171,890       $  3,298,278       $  12,715,946          $  6,346,762          $  6,346,762       
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

  GREG BECKER, PRESIDENT & CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER 
Compensation and Benefits Voluntary
Resignation
(including
Retirement)
  Involuntary
Termination for
Cause
  Involuntary
Termination
(Not for  Cause)

(1)
  Involuntary or for
Good Reason After
Change-in-Control

(2)
 Death Disability

Cash severance pay

  $   $   $950,000    $5,700,000    $   $ 

Market value of vested, exercisable stock options (3)

  8,632,032       8,632,032    8,632,032    8,632,032    8,632,032  

Market value of unvested stock options which would vest (4)

           4,897,334    4,897,334    4,897,334  

Market value of unvested restricted stock which would vest (4)

           12,775,297 (5)   9,901,562 (6)   9,901,562 (6) 

Company-paid health benefits

        13,501    17,992        

Accelerated retirement plan vesting

               ��  

Company-paid outplacement benefits

        20,000    20,000        

Deferred Compensation Plan balance payable (7)

  182,421    182,421    182,421    182,421    182,421    182,421  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

TOTAL

  $ 8,814,453    $ 182,421    $ 9,797,954    $ 32,225,076    $ 23,613,349    $ 23,613,349  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1)

Cash severance pay, Company-paid health benefits and Company-paid outplacement benefits reported under Involuntary“Involuntary Termination (Not for Cause) are calculated based on the terms of our U.S. Severance Benefit Policy.

(2)

Cash severance pay, Company-paid health benefits and Company-paid outplacement benefits reported under Involuntary“Involuntary or for Good Reason After Change-in-ControlChange-in-Control” are calculated based on the terms of our Change in Control Severance Plan for Executives. Consistent with that plan, amounts reported are calculated assuming no tax adjustment. Under our 2006 Equity Incentive Plan, if outstanding equity awards are not assumed or substituted by the successor of the Company upon a change of controlchange-in-control event, all such awards will fully vest and all restrictions thereon will lapse. The amounts reported in this table assume that such equity awards haveare not been assumed or substituted.

(3)

The market value of vested, exercisable stock options is calculated assuming a market value of $118.90$233.77 per share (the closing sharestock price as of December 31, 2015)29, 2017).

(4)

The market value of unvested equity whichthat would vest is calculated assuming a market value of $118.90$233.77 per share (the closing sharestock price as of December 31, 2015)29, 2017).

(5)

The amount reported is comprised of (a)(i) the market value of unvested restricted stock of $1,675,896$3,301,066 and (b)(ii) the market value of performance-based restricted stock unit awards of $2,122,841$9,474,231 (performance-based restricted stock unit awards for which final performance has not been determined as of December 31, 20152017 are deemed to be achieved at target level). See “Other Post-Employment Payments – 2006 Equity Incentive Plan” above.

(6)

The amount reported is comprised of (a)(i) the market value of unvested restricted stock of $1,675,896$3,301,066 and (b)(ii) the market value of performance-based restricted stock unit awards of $978,309$6,600,496 (performance-based restricted stock unit awards for which final performance has not been determined as of December 31, 20152017 are deemed to be achieved at target level). See “Other Post-Employment Payments – 2006 Equity Incentive Plan” above.

(7)

Deferred Compensation Plan balance for Mr. Becker reflects account balance as of December 31, 2015.2017. Mr. Becker is entitled to receive his account balance under each of the termination scenarios, to be paid in accordance with the plan and Mr. Becker’s payment election.

 

51

LOGO     EXECUTIVE OFFICERS & COMPENSATION


  MICHAEL DESCHENEAUX, CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER 

Compensation and Benefits

 Voluntary
Resignation
(including
Retirement)
  Involuntary
Termination
for Cause
  Involuntary
Termination
(Not for

Cause)
(1)
  Involuntary or for
Good Reason
After Change-in-

Control
(2)
 Death Disability

Cash severance pay

   $-       $-       $600,000     $1,920,000       $-       $-    

Market value of vested, exercisable stock options (3)

  1,493,059      -      1,493,059      1,493,059      1,493,059      1,493,059    

Market value of unvested stock options which would vest (4)

  -      -      -      738,309      738,309      738,309    

Market value of unvested restricted stock which would vest (4)

  -      -      -      1,678,749  (5)   1,209,927  (6)   1,209,927  (6) 

Company-paid health benefits

  -      -      20,613      26,671      -      -    

Accelerated retirement plan vesting

  -      -      -      -      -      -    

Company-paid outplacement benefits

  -      -      7,500      7,500      -      -    

Deferred Compensation Plan balance payable

  -      -      -      -      -      -    
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

TOTAL

   $  1,493,059       $            -       $  2,121,172       $  5,864,288      $  3,441,295      $  3,441,295   
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  DAN BECK, CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER 
Compensation and Benefits Voluntary
Resignation
(including
Retirement)
  Involuntary
Termination for
Cause
  Involuntary
Termination
(Not for
Cause)

(1)
  Involuntary or for
Good Reason After
Change-in- Control

(2)
 Death Disability

Cash severance pay

  $-        $   $262,500    $1,785,000    $   $ 

Market value of vested, exercisable stock options

  -                     

Market value of unvested stock options which would vest (3)

  -              188,919    188,919    188,919  

Market value of unvested restricted stock which would vest (3)

  -              1,033,965 (4)   1,033,965 (4)   1,033,965 (4) 

Company-paid health benefits

  -           10,503    27,178        

Accelerated retirement plan vesting

  -                     

Company-paid outplacement benefits

  -           7,500    7,500        

Deferred Compensation Plan balance payable

  -                     
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

TOTAL

  $            -        $              -    $ 280,503    $ 3,042,562    $ 1,222,884    $ 1,222,884  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1)

Cash severance pay, Company-paid health benefits and Company-paid outplacement benefits reported under Involuntary“Involuntary Termination (Not for Cause) are calculated based on the terms of our U.S. Severance Benefit Policy.

(2)

Cash severance pay, Company-paid health benefits and Company-paid outplacement benefits reported under Involuntary“Involuntary or for Good Reason After Change-in-ControlChange-in-Control” are calculated based on the terms of our Change in Control Severance Plan for Executives. Consistent with that plan, amounts reported are calculated assuming no tax adjustment. Under our 2006 Equity Incentive Plan, if outstanding equity awards are not assumed or substituted by the successor of the Company upon a change of controlchange-in-control event, all such awards will fully vest and all restrictions thereon will lapse. The amounts reported in this table assume that such equity awards haveare not been assumed or substituted.

(3)

The market value of vested, exercisable stock options is calculated assuming a market value of $118.90$233.77 per share (the closing sharestock price as of December 31, 2015)29, 2017).

(4)

The market value of unvested equity which would vest is calculated assuming a market value of $118.90 per share (the closing share price as of December 31, 2015).

(5)

The amount reported is comprised of (a) the market value of unvested restricted stock of $796,987 and (b) the market value of performance-based restricted stock unit awards of $881,762 (performance-based restricted stock unit awards for which final performance has not been determined as of December 31, 2015 are deemed to be achieved at target level). See “Other Post-Employment Payments – 2006 Equity Incentive Plan” above.

(6)

The amount reported is comprised of (a) the market value of unvested restricted stock of $796,987 and (b) the market value of performance-based restricted stock unit awards of $412,940 (performance-based restricted stock unit awards for which final performance has not been determined as of December 31, 2015 are deemed to be achieved at target level).stock. See “Other Post-Employment Payments – 2006 Equity Incentive Plan” above.

 

  JOHN CHINA, HEAD OF RELATIONSHIP BANKING 

Compensation and Benefits

 Voluntary
Resignation
(including
Retirement)
  Involuntary
Termination
for Cause
  Involuntary
Termination
(Not for

Cause)
(1)
  Involuntary or for
Good Reason
After Change-in-
Control
(2)
 Death Disability

Cash severance pay

   $-     $-     $480,000       $768,000       $-       $-    

Market value of vested, exercisable stock options (3)

  1,195,257      -      1,195,257      1,195,257      1,195,257      1,195,257    

Market value of unvested stock options which would vest (4)

  -      -      -      343,312      343,312      343,312    

Market value of unvested restricted stock which would vest (4)

  -      -      -      926,350  (5)   670,596  (6)   670,596  (6) 

Company-paid health benefits

  -      -      20,613      26,671      -      -    

Accelerated retirement plan vesting

  -      -      -      -      -      -    

Company-paid outplacement benefits

  -      -      7,500      7,500      -      -    

Deferred Compensation Plan balance payable

  -      -      -      -      -      -    
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

TOTAL

   $  1,195,257       $            -       $  1,703,370       $  3,267,090       $  2,209,165       $  2,209,165    
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

50

LOGO

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS & COMPENSATION

Compensation for NEOs

 


  MICHAEL DESCHENEAUX, PRESIDENT, SILICON VALLEY BANK 
Compensation and Benefits Voluntary
Resignation
(including
Retirement)
  Involuntary
Termination
for Cause
  Involuntary
Termination
(Not for Cause)
(1)
  Involuntary or for
Good Reason After
Change-in-Control
(2)
 Death Disability

Cash severance pay

  $   $              -    $2,660,000    $2,660,000    $   $ 

Market value of vested, exercisable stock options (3)

  3,500,928       3,500,928    3,500,928    3,500,928    3,500,928  

Market value of unvested stock options which would vest (4)

           1,973,011    1,973,011    1,973,011  

Market value of unvested restricted stock which would vest (4)

           5,110,913 (5)   3,951,882 (6)   3,951,882 (6) 

Company-paid health benefits

           27,178        

Accelerated retirement plan vesting

                  

Company-paid outplacement benefits

           7,500        

Deferred Compensation Plan balance payable

                  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

TOTAL

  $ 3,500,928    $   $ 6,160,928    $ 13,279,530    $  9,425,821    $  9,425,821  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1)

Cash severance pay Company-paid health benefits, and Company-paid outplacement benefits reported under Involuntary“Involuntary Termination (Not for Cause) are” is calculated based on the terms of our U.S. Severance Benefit Policy.Mr. Descheneaux’s severance agreement.

(2)

Cash severance pay, Company-paid health benefits and Company-paid outplacement benefits reported under Involuntary“Involuntary or for Good Reason After Change-in-ControlChange-in-Control” are calculated based on the terms of our Change in Control Severance Plan for Executives. Consistent with that plan, amounts reported are calculated assuming no tax adjustment. Under our 2006 Equity Incentive Plan, if outstanding equity awards are not assumed or substituted by the successor of the Company upon a change of controlchange-in-control event, all such awards will fully vest and all restrictions thereon will lapse. The amounts reported in this table assume that such equity awards haveare not been assumed or substituted.

(3)

The market value of vested, exercisable stock options is calculated assuming a market value of $118.90$233.77 per share (the closing sharestock price as of December 31, 2015)29, 2017).

(4)

The market value of unvested equity whichthat would vest is calculated assuming a market value of $118.90$233.77 per share (the closing sharestock price as of December 31, 2015)29, 2017).

(5)

The amount reported is comprised of (a)(i) the market value of unvested restricted stock of $445,399$1,332,255 and (b)(ii) the market value of performance-based restricted stock unit awards of $480,951$3,778,658 (performance-based restricted stock unit awards for which final performance has not been determined as of December 31, 20152017 are deemed to be achieved at target level). See “Other Post-Employment Payments – 2006 Equity Incentive Plan” above.

(6)

The amount reported is comprised of (a)(i) the market value of unvested restricted stock of $445,399$1,332,255 and (b)(ii) the market value of performance-based restricted stock unit awards of $225,197$2,619,627 (performance-based restricted stock unit awards for which final performance has not been determined as of December 31, 20152016 are deemed to be achieved at target level). See “Other Post-Employment Payments – 2006 Equity Incentive Plan” above.

 

52

LOGO     EXECUTIVE OFFICERS & COMPENSATION


  JOAN PARSONS, HEAD OF SPECIALTY BANKING 

Compensation and Benefits

 Voluntary
Resignation
(including
Retirement)
  Involuntary
Termination
for Cause
  Involuntary
Termination
(Not for
Cause)
(1)
  Involuntary or for
Good Reason
After Change-in-
Control

(2)
 Death Disability

Cash severance pay

   $-     $-       $480,000       $768,000       $-       $-    

Market value of vested, exercisable stock options (3)

  368,995      -      368,995      368,995      368,995      368,995    

Market value of unvested stock options which would vest (4)

  -      -      -      397,873      397,873      397,873    

Market value of unvested restricted stock which would vest (4)

  -      -      -      917,433  (5)   661,679  (6)   661,679  (6) 

Company-paid health benefits

  -      -      20,613      26,671      -      -    

Accelerated retirement plan vesting

  -      -      -      -      -      -    

Company-paid outplacement benefits

  -      -      7,500      7,500      -      -    

Deferred Compensation Plan balance payable

  -      -      -      -      -      -    
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

TOTAL

   $  368,995       $            -      $  877,108       $  2,486,472      $  1,428,547      $  1,428,547   
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  JOHN CHINA, HEAD OF TECHNOLOGY BANKING 
Compensation and Benefits Voluntary
Resignation
(including
Retirement)
  Involuntary
Termination for
Cause
  Involuntary
Termination
(Not for Cause)
(1)
  Involuntary or for
Good Reason  After
Change-in-Control
(2)
 Death Disability

Cash severance pay

  $   $                  -    $525,000    $945,000    $   $ 

Market value of vested, exercisable stock options (3)

   3,446,387        3,446,387    3,446,387    3,446,387    3,446,387  

Market value of unvested stock options which would vest (4)

           1,170,202    1,170,202    1,170,202  

Market value of unvested restricted stock which would vest (4)

           3,026,854 (5)   2,318,765 (6)   2,318,765 (6) 

Company-paid health benefits

        21,006    27,178        

Accelerated retirement plan vesting

                  

Company-paid outplacement benefits

        7,500    7,500        

Deferred Compensation Plan balance payable

                  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

TOTAL

  $3,446,387    $   $3,999,893    $ 8,623,121    $ 6,935,354    $ 6,935,354  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1)

Cash severance pay, Company-paid health benefits and Company-paid outplacement benefits reported under Involuntary“Involuntary Termination (Not for Cause) are calculated based on the terms of our U.S. Severance Benefit Policy.

(2)

Cash severance pay, Company-paid health benefits and Company-paid outplacement benefits reported under Involuntary“Involuntary or for Good Reason After Change-in-ControlChange-in-Control” are calculated based on the terms of our Change in Control Severance Plan for Executives. Consistent with that plan, amounts reported are calculated assuming no tax adjustment. Under our 2006 Equity Incentive Plan, if outstanding equity awards are not assumed or substituted by the successor of the Company upon a change of controlchange-in-control event, all such awards will fully vest and all restrictions thereon will lapse. The amounts reported in this table assume that such equity awards haveare not been assumed or substituted.

(3)

The market value of vested, exercisable stock options is calculated assuming a market value of $118.90$233.77 per share (the closing sharestock price as of December 31, 2015)29, 2017).

(4)

The market value of unvested equity whichthat would vest is calculated assuming a market value of $118.90$233.77 per share (the closing sharestock price as of December 31, 2015)29, 2017).

(5)

The amount reported is comprised of (a)(i) the market value of unvested restricted stock of $436,482$792,013 and (b)(ii) the market value of performance-based restricted stock unit awards of $480,951$2,234,841 (performance-based restricted stock unit awards for which final performance has not been determined as of December 31, 20152017 are deemed to be achieved at target level). See “Other Post-Employment Payments – 2006 Equity Incentive Plan” above.

(6)

The amount reported is comprised of (a)(i) the market value of unvested restricted stock of $436,482$792,013 and (b)(ii) the market value of performance-based restricted stock unit awards of $225,197$1,526,752 (performance-based restricted stock unit awards for which final performance has not been determined as of December 31, 20152017 are deemed to be achieved at target level). See “Other Post-Employment Payments – 2006 Equity Incentive Plan” above.

 

  BRUCE WALLACE, CHIEF DIGITAL OFFICER 

Compensation and Benefits

 Voluntary
Resignation
(including
Retirement)
  Involuntary
Termination
for Cause
  Involuntary
Termination
(Not for
Cause)
(1)
  Involuntary or for
Good Reason
After Change-in-
Control

(2)
 Death Disability

Cash severance pay 

   $-     $-     $402,866     $720,000       $-       $-    

Market value of vested, exercisable stock options (3)

  122,693      -      122,693      122,693      122,693      122,693    

Market value of unvested stock options which would vest (4)

  -      -      -      395,146      395,146      395,146    

Market value of unvested restricted stock which would vest (4)

  -      -      -      908,515  (5)   652,761  (6)   652,761  (6) 

Company-paid health benefits

  -      -      14,129      20,363      -      -    

Accelerated retirement plan vesting

  -      -      -      -      -      -    

Company-paid outplacement benefits

  -      -      7,500      7,500      -      -    

Deferred Compensation Plan balance payable

  -      -      -      -      -      -    
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

TOTAL

   $  122,693       $            -       $  547,188     $      2,174,217      $  1,170,600      $  1,170,600   
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

51

LOGO

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS & COMPENSATION

Compensation for NEOs

 


  MICHAEL DREYER, CHIEF OPERATIONS OFFICER 
Compensation and Benefits Voluntary
Resignation
(including
Retirement)
  Involuntary
Termination for
Cause
  Involuntary
Termination
(Not for Cause)
(1)
  Involuntary or for
Good Reason After
Change-in-Control
(2)
 Death Disability

Cash severance pay

  $   $               -    $250,000    $900,000    $   $ 

Market value of vested, exercisable stock options

                  

Market value of unvested stock options which would vest (3)

           195,879    195,879    195,879  

Market value of unvested restricted stock which would vest (3)

           2,255,647 (4)   1,905,460 (5)   1,905,460 (5) 

Company-paid health benefits

        10,503    27,178        

Accelerated retirement plan vesting (6)

           4,648    4,648    4,648  

Company-paid outplacement benefits

        7,500    7,500        

Deferred Compensation Plan balance payable

                  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

TOTAL

  $         -    $   $ 268,003    $ 3,390,852    $ 2,105,987    $ 2,105,987  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1)

Cash severance pay, Company-paid health benefits and Company-paid outplacement benefits reported under Involuntary“Involuntary Termination (Not for Cause) are calculated based on the terms of our U.S. Severance Benefit Policy.

(2)

Cash severance pay, Company-paid health benefits and Company-paid outplacement benefits reported under Involuntary“Involuntary or for Good Reason After Change-in-ControlChange-in-Control” are calculated based on the terms of our Change in Control Severance Plan for Executives. Consistent with that plan, amounts reported are calculated assuming no tax adjustment. Under our 2006 Equity Incentive Plan, if outstanding equity awards are not assumed or substituted by the successor of the Company upon a change of controlchange-in-control event, all such awards will fully vest and all restrictions thereon will lapse. The amounts reported in this table assume that such equity awards haveare not been assumed or substituted.

(3)

The market value of vested, exercisable stock options is calculated assuming a market value of $118.90 per share (the closing share price as of December 31, 2015).

(4)

The market value of unvested equity whichthat would vest is calculated assuming a market value of $118.90$233.77 per share (the closing sharestock price as of December 31, 2015)29, 2017).

(5)(4)

The amount reported is comprised of (a)(i) the market value of unvested restricted stock of $427,564$1,730,366 and (b)(ii) the market value of performance-based restricted stock unit awards of $480,951$525,281 (performance-based restricted stock unit awards for which final performance has not been determined as of December 31, 20152017 are deemed to be achieved at target level). See “Other Post-Employment Payments – 2006 Equity Incentive Plan” above.

(5)

The amount reported is comprised of (i) the market value of unvested restricted stock of $1,730,366 and (ii) the market value of performance-based restricted stock unit awards of $175,094 (performance-based restricted stock unit awards for which final performance has not been determined as of December 31, 2017 are deemed to be achieved at target level). See “Other Post-Employment Payments – 2006 Equity Incentive Plan” above.

(6)

Mr. Dreyer was 40% vested in his ESOP retirement account as of December 31, 2017.

  LAURA IZURIETA, CHIEF RISK OFFICER 

Compensation and Benefits

 Voluntary
Resignation
(including
Retirement)
  Involuntary
Termination
for Cause
  Involuntary
Termination
(Not for Cause)
(1)
  Involuntary or for
Good Reason After
Change-in-Control
(2)
 Death Disability

Cash severance pay

  $   $   $250,000    $800,000    $   $ 

Market value of vested, exercisable stock options

                  

Market value of unvested stock options which would vest (3)

           159,162    159,162    159,162  

Market value of unvested restricted stock which would vest (3)

           1,280,826 (4)   996,328 (5)   996,328 (5) 

Company-paid health benefits

        10,765    28,881        

Accelerated retirement plan vesting (6)

           3,481    3,481    3,481  

Company-paid outplacement benefits

        7,500    7,500        

Deferred Compensation Plan balance payable (7)

  50,844    50,844    50,844    50,844    50,844    50,844  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

TOTAL

  $ 50,844    $ 50,844    $ 319,109    $ 2,330,694    $ 1,209,815    $ 1,209,815  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1)

Cash severance pay, Company-paid health benefits and Company-paid outplacement benefits reported under “Involuntary Termination (Not for Cause)” are calculated based on the terms of our U.S. Severance Benefit Policy.

(2)

Cash severance pay, Company-paid health benefits and Company-paid outplacement benefits reported under Involuntary or for Good Reason AfterChange-in-Control are calculated based on the terms of our Change in Control Severance Plan for Executives. Consistent with that plan, amounts reported are calculated assuming no tax adjustment. Under our 2006 Equity Incentive Plan, if outstanding equity awards are not assumed or substituted by the successor of the Company upon achange-in-control event, all such awards will fully vest and all restrictions thereon will lapse. The amounts reported in this table assume that such equity awards are not assumed or substituted.

(3)

The market value of vested equity that would vest is calculated assuming a market value of $233.77 per share (the closing stock price as of December 29, 2017).

(4)

The amount reported is comprised of (a)(i) the market value of unvested restricted stock of $427,564$854,196 and (b)(ii) the market value of performance-based restricted stock unit awards of $225,197$426,630 (performance-based restricted stock unit awards for which final performance has not been determined as of December 31, 20152017 are deemed to be achieved at target level). See “Other Post-Employment Payments – Payments—2006 Equity Incentive Plan” above.

(5)

The amount reported is comprised of (i) the market value of unvested restricted stock of $854,196 and (ii) the market value of performance-based restricted stock unit awards of $142,132 (performance-based restricted stock unit awards for which final performance has not been determined as of December 31, 2017 are deemed to be achieved at target level). See “Other Post-Employment Payments—2006 Equity Incentive Plan” above.

(6)

Ms. Izurieta was 20% vested in her ESOP retirement account as of December 31, 2017

(7)

Deferred Compensation Plan balance for Ms. Izurieta reflects account balance as of December 31, 2017. Ms. Izurieta is entitled to receive her account balance under each of the termination scenarios, to be paid in accordance with the plan and Ms. Izurieta’s payment election.

52

LOGO

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS & COMPENSATION

Compensation for NEOs


CEO Pay Ratio

RATIO BASEDON 2017 COMPENSATION

As required by Section 953(b) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, and Item 402(u) of RegulationS-K, we are providing the following information about the relationship of the annual total compensation of our employees and the annual total compensation of Mr. Greg Becker, our President and Chief Executive Officer. For 2017, our last completed fiscal year: (i) the median of the annual total compensation of all employees of the company (other than the CEO) was $131,664; and (ii) the annual total compensation of our CEO, as reported in the “Summary Compensation Table”, was $6,106,711. Based on this information, for 2017, the ratio of the annual total compensation of our CEO to the median of the annual total compensation of all employees was 46 to 1. Please note that the provided pay ratio is a reasonable estimate calculated in accordance with Item 402(u) of RegulationS-K.

To identify the median of the annual total compensation of all our employees, as well as to determine the annual total compensation of the “median employee,” the methodology and the material assumptions, adjustments and estimates that we used is described below.

We selected October 31, 2017 (which is a date within the last 3 months of our last completed fiscal year) as the date upon which we would identify the “median employee”. This date was chosen to allow sufficient time to identify the median employee given the global scope of our operations. As of October 31, 2017, our employee population (excluding the CEO) consisted of approximately 2,450 individuals, including employees in the United States, United Kingdom, Ireland, Germany, Israel, China, Hong Kong and India. All 2,450 of these employees were included when identifying our “median employee”. No employees were excluded due to data privacy restrictions in our determination of the “median employee,” and allnon-U.S. employees were included in the determination of the “median employee.” To identify the “median employee” from our employee population, we utilized payroll and equity plan records for November 1, 2016 through October 31, 2017 (the “compensation measure”). Given that prior year payroll earnings reports would not be available untilmid-January and prior-year bonus and profit sharing amounts would not be available until late-February, we measured compensation for the employees in our sample using the12-month period ended October 31, 2017. The payroll records included all earnings paid, except most benefit programs, realized equity compensation earnings, deferred compensation payments, andnon-taxable per diem payments. Equity plan records included the grant date fair value of all equity grants (with performance-based equity awards assumed to be achieved at target). Additionally, we did not annualize compensation for employees who were not active for the entire period between November 1, 2016 and October 31, 2017. Employees who did not receive compensation during this period were excluded (for example, recent hires who did not receive a paycheck by October 31, 2017). In identifying the “median employee”, we did not make anycost-of-living adjustments. Amounts paid in foreign currency were converted into United States dollars using third party foreign exchange rates as of October 31, 2017. We identified our “median employee” using a standard median formula based on the compensation measure, which was consistently applied to all of our employees included in this calculation.

With respect to the annual total compensation of the “median employee,” we identified and calculated the elements of such employee’s compensation for 2017 in accordance with the requirements of Item 402(c)(2)(x) of RegulationS-K, resulting in annual total compensation of $131,664. With respect to the annual total compensation for the CEO, we used the amount reported in the “Total” column of our 2017 Summary Compensation Table.

 

53

LOGO

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS & COMPENSATION

CEO Pay Ratio

LOGO     EXECUTIVE OFFICERS & COMPENSATION


  Security Ownership Information

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERSSecurity Ownership of Directors and Executive Officers

The following table sets forth information regarding beneficial ownership as of the Record Date of our Common Stock by: (i) each of our directors and director nominees, (ii) each of the executive officersNEOs named in the “Summary Compensation Table” above, and (iii) all directors, director nominees and executive officers as a group. Unless otherwise noted and subject to applicable community property laws, the respective nominees have sole voting and investment power with respect to the shares shown in the table as beneficially owned.

 

   Shares Beneficially Owned 

Name of Beneficial Owner

  Number of
Shares
   Percent of Class
Owned
 

Eric Benhamou (1)

   15,2623,443    *

David Clapper (1)

   14,70616,252*

John Clendening (2)

337    * 

Roger Dunbar (2)(3)

   15,60518,117    * 

Joel Friedman (1)

   19,70621,252    * 

Lata Krishnan (3)Kimberly Jabal^

   12,056--

Lata Krishnan (4)

13,778    * 

Jeffrey Maggioncalda (1)

   4,7016,247    * 

Mary Miller (1)

   1,7373,283    * 

Kate Mitchell (3)(4)

   7,9498,686    * 

John Robinson (1)

   5,4717,017    * 

Garen Staglin (1)

   11,40610,952    * 

Greg Becker (4)(5)

   96,461121,666*

Dan Beck

--

John China (6)

42,097    * 

Michael Descheneaux (5)(7)

   42,01042,811    * 

John China (6)Michael Dreyer

   32,8412,979    * 

Joan Parsons (7)Laura Izurieta

   34,656*

Bruce Wallace (8)

12,400626    * 

All directors, director nominees and executive officers as a group (23 persons) (9)(8)

   401,249390,069    * 

 

*

Represents beneficial ownership of less than 1%.

^New director nominee
(1)

Includes 737561 shares which may be acquired pursuant to the releasevesting of restricted stock units within 60 days of the Record Date.

(2)

Includes 1,474337 shares which may be acquired pursuant to the releasevesting of restricted stock units within 60 days of the Record Date.

(3)

Includes 1,122 shares which may be acquired pursuant to the vesting of restricted stock units within 60 days of the Record Date.

(4)Does not include 737561 shares underlying restricted stock units, receipt of which the director has elected to defer.

(4)

(5)

Includes 45,49461,443 shares which may be acquired pursuant to the exercise of stock options within 60 days of the Record Date.

(5)

(6)

Includes 28,87822,863 shares which may be acquired pursuant to the exercise of stock options within 60 days of the Record Date.

(6)

(7)

Includes 19,43525,022 shares which may be acquired pursuant to the exercise of stock options within 60 days of the Record Date.

(7)

(8)

Includes 8,032141,072 shares which may be acquired pursuant to the exercise of stock options within 60 days of the Record Date.

(8)

Includes 2,250 shares which may be acquired pursuant to the exercise of stock options within 60 days of the Record Date.

(9)

Includes 132,861 shares which may be acquired pursuant to the releasevesting of restricted stock units or the exercise of stock options within 60 days of the Record Date.

 

54

LOGO

SECURITY OWNERSHIP INFORMATION

Directors and Executive Officers

LOGO     SECURITY OWNERSHIP INFORMATION


SECURITY OWNERSHIP SECURITY OWNERSHIPOF PRINCIPAL STOCKHOLDERS PRINCIPAL STOCKHOLDERS

The following table sets forth information regarding the beneficial ownership of our Common Stock as of December 31, 20152017 by those we know to own more than 5% of our outstanding Common Stock, and is based upon Schedules 13D and 13G filed with the SEC. Applicable percentages are based on 51,610,22652,835,188 shares outstanding as of December 31, 2015.2017. We know of no persons other than those entities described below which beneficially own more than 5% of our outstanding Common Stock. Unless otherwise noted, the respective nominees have sole voting and investment power with respect to the shares shown in the table as beneficially owned.

 

       Shares Beneficially Owned     

Name and Address of Beneficial Owner

  Number of
Shares
   Percent of
Class Owned
 

BlackRock, Inc. (1)

55 East 52nd Street

New York, NY 10055

   3,837,003     7.43

The Vanguard Group (2)

100 Vanguard Blvd.

Malvern, PA 19355

   3,544,825     6.87
            Shares Beneficially Owned          

Name and Address of Beneficial Owner              

  Number of
Shares
   Percent of
Class Owned
 

BlackRock, Inc. (1)

   5,104,914    9.66%  

55 East 52nd Street

New York, NY 10055

 

    

The Vanguard Group (2)

   4,512,684    8.54%  

100 Vanguard Blvd.

Malvern, PA 19355

    

 

 

(1)

Information is based on figures set forth in athe Schedule 13G/A filed by BlackRock, Inc., on January 27, 2016.23, 2018. According to suchthe Schedule 13G/A, of the total shares reported, BlackRock, Inc., an investment adviser, has sole voting power with respect to 3,659,8044,775,678 shares and sole dispositive power with respect to 3,837,0035,104,914 shares.

(2)

Information is based on figures set forth in athe Schedule 13G/A filed by The Vanguard Group (“Vanguard Group”) on February 10, 2016.12, 2018. According to suchthe Schedule 13G/A, of the total shares reported, Vanguard Group, an investment advisor, has sole voting power with respect to 37,54542,203 shares and sole dispositive power with respect to 3,507,8804,462,771 shares.

 

55

LOGO

SECURITY OWNERSHIP INFORMATION

Principal Stockholders

LOGO     SECURITY OWNERSHIP INFORMATION


  OTHER PROXY PROPOSALS

Proposal No. 2 – Ratification of Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO THE 1999 EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN

The Board of Directors Recommends a Vote “For” the Approval of an Amendment to the 1999 Employee Stock Purchase Plan

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL AND SELECTED PLAN AND FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Summary of Proposal:

We are proposing to increase the share reserve of our 1999 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, as amended by 1,500,000 shares of our Common Stock.

Number of Shares Available for Issuance:

425,728 (as of January 1, 2016, not including the proposed 1,500,000 share increase)

Number of Total Shares of Common Stock Outstanding:

51,610,226 (as of December 31, 2015)

Percentage of Total Available Shares (Including Proposed Increase) of Total Outstanding Shares (as of December 31, 2015):

3.7%

Number of Shares Purchased under Purchase Plan in last three years:

2015: 140,471 shares

2014: 130,110 shares

2013: 176,416 shares

Certain Purchase Plan Features (as further described below or in the Purchase Plan):

•    Broad-based Eligibility. Generally, employees with at least twenty (20) hours per week and more than five (5) months in a calendar year are eligible to participate in the Purchase Plan.

•    5% Limit. Purchase Plan participants are subject to a limit of 5% or more beneficial ownership in the Company.

•    15% Purchase Price Discount Limit. The purchase price for shares may not be lower than eighty-five percent (85%) of the fair market value of the Common Stock.

•    Limit on Offering Period Term. No offering period can exceed twenty-seven (27) months under the plan. Our typical offering period is six months.

The stockholders are being asked to approve an amendment to the Company’s 1999 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “Purchase Plan”). A total of 3,000,000 shares of our Common Stock are currently authorized for sale under the Purchase Plan. The Purchase Plan is a significant part of our overall equity compensation strategy, especially with respect to our non-executive employees and is one of the primary programs through which our employees may achieve ownership in the Company and thereby share in the success of our Company. Therefore, the Board has approved an amendment to the Purchase Plan to increase the number of the Company’s Common Stock available for sale under the Purchase Plan by 1,500,000 shares to a total of 4,500,000 (as adjusted for stock splits) shares, subject to stockholder approval at the Meeting. The Purchase Plan is not being amended in any other material respect.

Background for Request

As of December 31, 2015 which is the last day of the most recently completed offering, there were 1,303 employees participating in the offering then in progress under the Purchase Plan and these employees purchased approximately 47,232 shares of our Common Stock (with an approximate value of $5,615,885 on the date of purchase) at a purchase price of $101.07 per share.

As of February 23, 2016, without giving effect to the proposed amendment, a total of 425,728 shares were available for sale under the Purchase Plan. If stockholders approve this proposal, the total number of shares authorized and reserved for sale under the Purchase Plan will be 4,500,000. Since adoption, approximately 2,574,272 shares have been issued under the Purchase Plan. Based on current forecasts, current stock price levels, and estimated participation rates, if the increase subject to this proposal is not approved, it is anticipated that the Purchase Plan will run out of available shares after the year 2017. The requested increase of 1,500,000 shares represents approximately 2.9% of the Company’s outstanding shares as of December 31, 2015.

56

LOGO     OTHER PROXY PROPOSALS


In considering its recommendation to amend the Purchase Plan to reserve an additional 1,500,000 shares available for sale thereunder, the Board considered the historical number of shares of Company Common Stock purchased under the Purchase Plan in the past three years. In fiscal years 2013, 2014 and 2015, the number of shares purchased under the Purchase Plan was 176,416 shares, 130,110 shares and 140,471 shares, respectively. Although the Board considered the historical number of purchased shares when considering its recommendation, the actual number of shares that will be purchased under the Purchase Plan in any given year will depend on a number of factors, including the number of participants, the participant’s participation rates and the Company’s stock price. Based on participation in the most recently completed fiscal year and current stock price levels, an additional 1,500,000 shares is expected to meet the Company’s needs for at least four years, but the actual number of shares that will be purchased under the Purchase Plan will depend on the factors listed above.

Summary of the Company 1999 Employee Stock Purchase Plan

The following is a summary of the principal features of the Purchase Plan and its operation. The summary is qualified in its entirety by reference to the Purchase Plan as set forth in Appendix B.

General

The Purchase Plan originally was adopted by the Board in January 1999, originally was approved by our stockholders in April 1999 and was most recently approved by our stockholders on April 22, 2010. The Board, through its Compensation Committee, approved the amendment to increase the number of the Company’s Common Stock available for sale under the Purchase Plan by 1,500,000 shares on February 9, 2016, subject to and effective upon, stockholder approval at the Meeting. The purpose of the Purchase Plan is to provide a means by which employees of the Company and its designated affiliates may be given an opportunity to purchase Common Stock of the Company.

Shares Available for Issuance

If our stockholders approve this proposal, a total of 4,500,000 (as adjusted for stock splits) shares of our Common Stock will be subject to the Purchase Plan. As of February 23, 2016, after giving effect to the proposed amendment, a total of 1,925,728 shares would be actually available for sale under the Purchase Plan.

Administration

The Board administers the Purchase Plan unless and until the Board delegates administration to a committee appointed by the Board (in either case, the “Administrator”). Whether or not the Board has delegated administration, the Board has the final power to determine all questions of policy and expediency that may arise in the administration of the Purchase Plan. The Administrator has the power to construe and interpret the Purchase Plan and rights granted under it, and to establish, amend and revoke rules and regulations for its administration. The Administrator, in the exercise of this power, may correct any defect, omission or inconsistency in the Purchase Plan, in a manner and to the extent it deems necessary or expedient to make the Purchase Plan fully effective. The Administrator may amend or terminate the Purchase Plan, subject to the Purchase Plan’s provisions. Generally, the Administrator may exercise such powers and perform such acts it deems necessary or expedient to promote the best interests of the Company and its affiliates and to carry out the intent that the Purchase Plan be treated as an “employee stock purchase plan” within the meaning of Section 423 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”). Any interpretation of the Purchase Plan by the Administrator of any decision made by it under the Purchase Plan is final and binding on all persons.

Eligibility

Employees of the Company and its designated affiliates whose customary employment is at least twenty (20) hours per week and more than five (5) months in a calendar year are eligible to participate in the Purchase Plan; except that no employee will be granted an option under the Purchase Plan to the extent that, immediately after the grant, such employee would own five percent (5%) or more of the total combined voting power or value of all classes of the Company’s stock or the stock of any parent or subsidiary. The Administrator may require that an employee be in the employ of the Company or any affiliate for a continuous period of time preceding the grant of a right, but in no event will the required period of continuous employment be greater than two (2) years. Officers of the Company and any designated subsidiary who otherwise satisfy the eligibility requirements are eligible to participate in the Purchase Plan; provided, however, that the Administrator may provide that certain employees who are highly compensated employees within the meaning of Code Section 414(q) with compensation above a certain level or who is an officer or subject to the disclosure requirements under Section 16(a) of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, will not be eligible to participate in the Purchase Plan. The Administrator has the authority to adjust eligibility requirements consistent with the terms of the Purchase Plan.

57

LOGO     OTHER PROXY PROPOSALS


Notwithstanding the foregoing, no employee will be granted a right to purchase stock under all of the Company’s employee stock purchase plans that accrues at a rate which exceeds $25,000 worth of stock (determined at the fair market value of the shares at the time such right is granted) for each calendar year in which such rights are outstanding at any time. Subject to the limit in the previous sentence, the maximum aggregate number of shares that a participant may purchase during an offering is 3,000 shares.

As of February 23, 2016, approximately 2,050 employees, including all five of our named executive officers, were eligible to participate in the Purchase Plan. Non-employee members of the Board are not eligible to participate in the Purchase Plan.

Offerings

The Purchase Plan is implemented by offerings of rights to eligible employees. Each offering will be in such form and will contain such terms and conditions as the Administrator will deem appropriate, which will comply with Code Section 423(b)(5) that all employees granted rights to purchase stock in an offering will have the same rights and privileges. The provisions of separate offerings need not be identical. The Administrator will determine the duration of an offering period, provided that no offering period can exceed twenty-seven (27) months.

If an employee has more than one (1) right outstanding under the Purchase Plan, unless he or she indicates otherwise, a right with a lower exercise price (or an earlier-granted right if two (2) rights have identical exercise prices), will be exercised to the fullest possible extent before a right with a higher exercise price (or a later-granted right if two (2) rights have identical exercise prices) will be exercised.

Contributions

An eligible employee may become a participant in the Purchase Plan pursuant to an offering by delivering an enrollment agreement to the Company within the time period specified in the offering, in such form as the Company provides. Employees may authorize payroll deductions of up to 15% (the actual percentage to be determined by the Administrator) of such employee’s earnings during the offering.

Purchase Price

The purchase price for shares is the lesser of: (i) eighty-five percent (85%) of the fair market value of the Common Stock on the first date of the offering, or (ii) eighty-five percent (85%) of the fair market value of the Common Stock on the purchase date.

Payment of Purchase Price

On each purchase date, each participant’s accumulated contributions will be applied to the purchase of whole shares of Company Common Stock, up to the maximum number of shares permitted under the Purchase Plan and a given purchase period. No fractional shares will be issued.

Withdrawal

At any time during an offering, a participant may terminate his or her contributions under the Purchase Plan and withdraw from the offering by delivering to the Company a notice of withdrawal in such form as the Company provides. The withdrawal may be elected at any time prior to the end of the offering except as provided by the Administrator. Once a participant withdraws from an offering, the Company will distribute to the participant all of his or her accumulated contributions under the offering, without interest, and the participant’s interest in that offering will be automatically terminated. A participant’s withdrawal from an offering will have no effect upon his or her eligibility to participate in any other offerings under the Purchase Plan, but the participant will be required to deliver a new enrollment agreement in order to participate in subsequent offerings under the Purchase Plan.

Termination of Employment

Rights granted under the Purchase Plan terminate immediately upon cessation of a participant’s employment with the Company and any designated affiliate for any reason. Once a participant’s employment is terminated, the Company will distribute to such terminated employee all of his or her accumulated contributions under the offering without interest.

Adjustments upon Changes in Capitalization, Dissolution or Liquidation, or Change of Control

Changes in Capitalization.If any change is made in the stock subject to the Purchase Plan, or subject to any rights granted under the Purchase Plan (through merger, consolidation, reorganization, recapitalization, stock dividend, dividend in property other than cash, stock split, liquidating dividend, combination of shares, exchange of shares, change in corporate structure or other transaction not involving the receipt of consideration by the Company), the Purchase Plan and outstanding rights will be appropriately adjusted in the classes and maximum number of shares subject to the Purchase Plan and the classes and number of

58

LOGO     OTHER PROXY PROPOSALS


shares and price per share of stock subject to outstanding rights. Such adjustments will be made by the Administrator, whose determination will be final, binding and conclusive. The conversion of any convertible securities of the Company will not be treated as a transaction not involving the receipt of consideration by the Company.

Dissolution, Liquidation, or Change in Control.In the event of the Company’s dissolution or liquidation or certain change in control transactions set forth in the Purchase Plan, then the Administrator in its sole discretion may take any of the following actions: (i) any surviving or acquiring corporation may assume outstanding rights or substitute similar rights for those under the Purchase Plan, (ii) such rights may continue in full force and effect, or (iii) all participants’ accumulated contributions may be used to purchase the Company’s Common Stock immediately prior to or within a reasonable period of time following the dissolution, liquidation or transaction, and the participants’ rights under the ongoing offering terminated.

Amendment and Termination of the Purchase Plan

Amendment.The Administrator may, at any time and from time to time, amend the Purchase Plan or the terms of one or more offerings. Certain amendments will not be effective unless stockholder approval is obtained within twelve (12) months before or after the amendment, including increasing the number of shares reserved under the Purchase Plan, modifying the eligibility provisions, and other modifications which require stockholder approval under Code Section 423 or Rule 16b-3. The Administrator may amend the Purchase Plan or an offering in any respect the Administrator deems necessary or advisable to provide eligible employees with the maximum benefits provided or to be provided under the provisions of the Code and the regulations promulgated thereunder relating to employee stock purchase plans and/or to bring the Purchase Plan and/or rights granted under an offering into compliance therewith. Amendments generally may not adversely affect any rights and obligations granted before the amendment, except with the consent of the affected participant, or except as necessary to comply with any laws or governmental regulations, or except as necessary to ensure that the Purchase Plan and/or rights granted under an offering comply with the requirements of Section 423 of the Code.

Termination. The Administrator in its discretion may suspend or terminate the Purchase Plan at any time. The Purchase Plan will automatically terminate if all the shares subject to the Purchase Plan are issued. No rights may be granted under the Purchase Plan while the Purchase Plan is suspended or after it is terminated. Rights and obligations under any rights granted while the Purchase Plan is in effect generally will not be impaired by suspension or termination of the Purchase Plan, except as expressly provided in the Purchase Plan, or with the consent of the person to whom such rights were granted, or except as necessary to comply with any laws or governmental regulation, or except as necessary to ensure that the Purchase Plan and/or rights granted under an offering comply with the requirements of Section 423 of the Code.

Participation in Plan Benefits

Participation in the Purchase Plan is voluntary and is dependent on each eligible employee’s election to participate and his or her determination as to the level of payroll deductions or other contributions. Accordingly, future purchases under the Purchase Plan are not determinable. Non-employee directors are not eligible to participate in the Purchase Plan. For illustrative purposes, the following table sets forth (i) the number of shares of our Common Stock that were purchased during the last fiscal year under the Purchase Plan and (ii) the weighted average price per share paid for such shares.

Name of Individual or Group

  Number of
Shares
Purchased
   Weighted
Average Per
Share Purchase
Price ($)
 

Greg Becker

   217    $          97.86  

Michael Descheneaux

   217     97.86  

John China

   217     97.86  

Joan Parsons

   217     97.86  

Bruce Wallace

   N/A     -      

All executive officers, as a group

   1,451     98.33  

All directors who are not executive officers, as a group

   N/A     -      

All employees who are not executive officers, as a group

       139,020     98.94  

59

LOGO     OTHER PROXY PROPOSALS


Certain U.S. Federal Income Tax Information

The following brief summary of the effect of U.S. federal income taxation upon the participant and the Company with respect to the shares purchased under the Purchase Plan does not purport to be complete, and does not discuss the tax consequences of a participant’s death or the income tax laws of any state or non-U.S. jurisdiction in which the participant may reside.

The Purchase Plan, and the right of participants to make purchases thereunder, is intended to qualify under the provisions of Sections 421 and 423 of the Code. Under these provisions, no income will be taxable to a participant until the shares purchased under the Purchase Plan are sold or otherwise disposed of. Upon sale or other disposition of the shares, the participant generally will be subject to tax in an amount that depends upon the holding period. If the shares are sold or otherwise disposed of more than two (2) years from the first day of the applicable offering and one (1) year from the applicable date of purchase, the participant will recognize ordinary income measured as the lesser of (a) the excess of the fair market value of the shares at the time of such sale or disposition over the purchase price, or (b) 15% of the fair market value of the shares on the start date of that offering. Any additional gain will be treated as long-term capital gain. If the shares are sold or otherwise disposed of before the expiration of these holding periods, the participant will recognize ordinary income generally measured as the excess of the fair market value of the shares on the date the shares are purchased over the purchase price. Any additional gain or loss on such sale or disposition will be long-term or short-term capital gain or loss, depending on how long the shares have been held from the date of purchase. The Company generally is not entitled to a deduction for amounts taxed as ordinary income or capital gain to a participant except to the extent of ordinary income recognized by participants upon a sale or disposition of shares prior to the expiration of the holding periods described above.

THE FOREGOING IS ONLY A SUMMARY OF THE EFFECT OF U.S. FEDERAL INCOME TAXATION UPON PARTICIPANTS AND THE COMPANY UNDER THE PURCHASE PLAN. IT DOES NOT PURPORT TO BE COMPLETE, AND DOES NOT DISCUSS THE TAX CONSEQUENCES OF A PARTICIPANT’S DEATH OR THE PROVISIONS OF THE INCOME TAX LAWS OF ANY MUNICIPALITY, STATE OR NON-U.S. JURISDICTION IN WHICH THE PARTICIPANT MAY RESIDE.

Vote Required; Recommendation of Board of Directors

The approval of the amendment to the Purchase Plan requires the affirmative vote of the holders a majority of the Votes Cast on the proposal at the Meeting.

Our Board of Directors has approved this proposal and recommends that stockholders vote “FOR” the approval of the amendment to the Company’s 1999 Employee Stock Purchase Plan.

60

LOGO     OTHER PROXY PROPOSALS


Proposal No. 3

RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF

INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Board of Directors Recommends a Vote “For”FOR the Ratification of the Appointment

of KPMG LLP as the Company’s Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Audit Committee has appointed the firm of KPMG LLP to be our independent registered public accounting firm for our 20162018 fiscal year. KPMG LLP has audited our financial statements since November 1994. While neither our Bylaws nor other governing documents require stockholder ratification of the selection of KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm, the Board is, based on the recommendation of the Audit Committee, submitting the appointment of KPMG LLP to the stockholders for ratification as a matter of good corporate practice. If theour stockholders do not ratify suchthe selection by the affirmative vote of the holders ofKPMG by a majority of the Votes Cast,votes present and entitled to vote on the matter, then the Audit Committee may reconsider its selection.

RepresentativesWe expect a representative from the firm of KPMG LLP willto be present at the Meeting andAnnual Meeting. The representative will be afforded the opportunity to make a statement if they desire to do so. They will alsoso and is expected to be available to respond to stockholders’stockholder questions.

PRINCIPAL AUDIT FEES AND SERVICESPRINCIPAL AUDIT FEES AND SERVICES

The following table sets forth fees for services billed by or expected to be billed by KPMG LLP for the fiscal years 20152017 and 2014,2016, all of which were approved by the Audit Committee in conformity with itspre-approval process:

 

  2015   2014  2017   2016 

Audit fees

  $5,852,555    $5,139,121     $6,262,414       $5,678,821   

Audit-related fees (1)

   208,000     278,443    296,930      288,443   

Tax fees (2)

   551,328     663,184    1,500,644      1,228,565   

All other fees (3)

   15,371     115,000    56,010      -       
  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

 

Total

  $    6,627,254    $    6,195,748     $        8,115,998       $        7,195,829   
  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

 

 

(1)

Consists principally of fees billed or expected to be billed as incurred on a time and material basis related to reviews of internal controls attestation for selected information systems and business units (SSAE 16 audits), and services related to proposed accounting standards.units.

(2)

Represents fees for services provided in connection with the Company’s tax compliance tax advice and tax planning.consulting.

(3)

Represents 2017 fees for advisory services relatingrelated to the Company’s selection of a consultant to change our allowance for loan and lease losses (“ALLL”) system.certain outsourcing initiatives.

In accordance with its charter, the Audit Committee must explicitly approve the engagement of the independent auditor for all audit and permissiblenon-audit related services, as required by law. To the extent permitted by applicable law, the charter also permits the Committee the authority to adoptpre-approval policies and procedures and/or delegate authority to grant approvals to one or more of its members. During fiscal years 20152017 and 2014,2016, all audit andnon-audit related services performed by our independent auditor were approved orpre-approved by the Audit Committee. Additionally, the Audit Committee reviewed allnon-audit related services provided by our independent auditor, KPMG LLP. The Audit Committee concluded that the performance of these services did not compromise KPMG LLP’s independence in the conduct of its auditing function. KPMG LLP also confirmed their independence to the Audit Committee.

 

6156

LOGO

OTHER PROXY PROPOSALS

Proposal 2 — Ratification of Auditor

LOGO     OTHER PROXY PROPOSALS


Proposal No. 43 – Advisory Approval of our Executive Compensation

ADVISORY APPROVAL OF OUR EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The Board of Directors Recommends a Vote “FOR”FOR the Approval of the Compensation of our Named Executive Officers, as Disclosed in this Proxy Statement

Pursuant toAt the recommendation2017 Annual Meeting of our Board,Stockholders, our stockholders approved in 2011 the frequency ofvoted that our advisory vote to approve ouron executive compensation (otherwise known as “Say on Pay”) to be on an annual basis.held annually. Our Say on Pay vote provides our stockholders the opportunity to vote to approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of our NEOs as further described in the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section of this Proxy Statement, including the accompanying compensation tables and narrative discussion.discussion therein. This vote is not intended to address any specific item of compensation, but rather the overall compensation of our NEOs and the philosophy, policies and practices described in this Proxy Statement.

We ask our stockholders to indicate their support for our executive compensation program for our NEOs and vote “FOR” the following resolution at the Annual Meeting:

“RESOLVED, that the compensation paid to the Company’s named executive officers, as disclosed pursuant to Item 402 of RegulationS-K, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, compensation tables and narrative discussion, is hereby APPROVED.”

Because your vote is advisory, it will not be binding upon the Board or the Compensation Committee and may not be construed as overruling any decision by the Board or the Compensation Committee. However, the Board and Compensation Committee may, in eachvalue the opinion of their sole discretion,our stakeholders and will take into serious consideration the outcome of thethis advisory vote when considering future executive compensation arrangements.

Stockholders are encouraged to carefully review the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” and “Compensation for Named Executive Officers” sections of this Proxy Statement for a detailed discussion of our executive compensation program for our NEOs.

 

6257

LOGO

OTHER PROXY PROPOSALS

Proposal 3 — Say on Pay

LOGO     OTHER PROXY PROPOSALS


  MEETING AND OTHER INFORMATION

INFORMATION ABOUT VOTING AND PROXY SOLICITATIONInformation About Voting and Proxy Solicitation

VotingVOTING

Holders of our Common Stockcommon stock are entitled to one vote for each share held on all matters covered by this Proxy Statement, except for the election of directors. With respect to the election of directors, each stockholder has the right to invoke cumulative voting, which entitles each stockholder to as many votes as shall equal the number of shares held by such stockholder, multiplied by the number of directors to be elected. A stockholderAccordingly, you may cast all of his or heryour votes for a single candidate or distribute suchyour votes among as many of the candidates as he or she chooses (upyou choose, up to a maximum of the number of directors to be elected).elected. However, no stockholder shallwill be entitled to cumulate votes for a candidate unless such candidate’s namecandidate has been properly placed in nominationnominated prior to the voting in accordance with Article Fifth of the Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company and the stockholder (or any other stockholder) has given notice at the meeting prior to the voting of the stockholder’s intention to cumulate votes. If any stockholder has given such notice, all stockholders may cumulate their votes for candidates properly placed in nomination. If cumulative voting is properly invoked, the Proxy holders (the individuals named on the Proxy Card) are given discretionary authority under the terms of the Proxy to cumulate votes represented by shares for which they are named Proxy holders as they see fit among the nominees in order to assure the election of as many of such nominees as possible.

Whether you hold shares in your name or through a broker, bank or other nominee, you may vote without attending the meeting.Annual Meeting. You may vote by granting a Proxy or, for shares held through a broker, bank or other nominee, by submitting voting instructions to that nominee. Instructions for voting by telephone, by using the Internet or by mail are on your Proxy Card or “Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting,, as applicable. For shares held through a broker, bank or other nominee, follow the voting instructions included with your materials. If you provide specific voting instructions, your shares will be voted as you have instructed for any item on which you provide instructionseach proposal enumerated in this Proxy Statement and as the Proxy holdersHolders may determine within their discretion for any other matters including any additional matters, whichthat properly come before the meeting.

If you hold shares in your name and you sign and return a Proxy Card without giving specific voting instructions, your shares will be voted as recommended by our Board on all matters set forth in this Proxy Statement and as the Proxy holders may determine in their discretion with respect to any other matters that properly come before the meeting. If you hold your shares through a broker, bank or other nominee and you do not provide instructions on how to vote, your broker or other nominee may have authority to vote your shares on certain matters. SeeSee “Quorum; Abstentions; Broker Non-Votes” below.

Quorum; Abstentions; Broker Non-VotesNon-Votes”below.

QUORUM; ABSTENTIONS; BROKER NON-VOTES

The required quorum for the transaction of business at the Annual Meeting is a majority of the shares of Common Stock issued and outstanding on the Record Date. Shares voted are treated as being present at the meetingAnnual Meeting for purposes of establishing a quorum and are also treated as shares “represented and voting”present at the Annual Meeting (the “Votes Cast”) with respect to such matter.

We count abstentionsExcept in the case of the election of directors, adoption of the proposals requires the affirmative vote the holders of a majority of the Common Stock represented and entitled to vote on the matter. This means that of the shares represented at the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote, a majority of them must be voted “for” the proposal for it to be approved. Abstentions will be deemed present for purposes of determining both (i) the presence or absence of a quorum for the transaction of business and (ii) the total number of Votes Cast with respect to a proposal (other than Proposal No. 1 regarding the election of directors). Accordingly, in cases other than the election of directors, abstentions will have the same effect as a vote against the proposal.proposal, except for the election directors.

Brokernon-votes occur on a matter when a broker, bank or other nominee is not permitted to vote on that matter without instructions from the beneficial owner and the beneficial owner does not give instructions. Without such voting instructions, for example, your broker or other nominee cannot vote your shares on “non-routine”“non-routine” matters such as the election of directors, and the advisory vote on Say on Pay. Your broker or other nominee may, however, have discretion to vote your shares on “routine” matters, such as the ratification of the appointment of KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for our 20162018 fiscal year. Brokernon-votes will be counted for purposes of determining the presence or absence of a quorum for the transaction of business but will not be counted for purposes of determining the number of Votes Castthe votes represented and entitled to vote with respect to proposals on which brokers, banks or other nominees are prohibited from exercising their discretionary authority.

 

6358

LOGO

MEETING & OTHER INFORMATION

Voting and Proxy Solicitation

LOGO     MEETING & OTHER INFORMATION


Voting RequiredVOTING REQUIRED

The vote required for each proposal and the effect of uninstructed shares and abstentions on each proposal is as follows:

 

Proposal

 

Vote Required

 

Broker Non-

Votes
Allowed

 

Abstentions

 

You

May Vote

Proposal No. 1 - Election of Directors

 

Plurality of Votes Cast*

 

No

 

No Effect

 

FOR or WITHHOLD

Proposal No. 2 Approval- Ratification of Amendment of 1999 Employee Stock Purchase PlanAuditors

 

Majority of Votes CastPresent and Entitled to Vote

 No

Yes

 

Vote Against

 

FOR, AGAINST or ABSTAIN

Proposal No. 3 - - Ratification of AuditorsMajority of Votes CastYesVote AgainstFOR, AGAINST or ABSTAIN
Proposal No. 4- Advisory Vote on Say on Pay Majority of Votes CastPresent and Entitled to Vote No Vote Against FOR, AGAINST or ABSTAIN

 

*

* SeeMajority Voting Policy” underProposal No. 1 – Election of Directors.”

REVOCABILITYOF PROXIES

Revocability of Proxies

Any person giving a Proxy in the form accompanying this Proxy Statement has the power to revoke the Proxy at any time prior to its use. A Proxy is revocable prior to the Annual Meeting by delivering either a written instrument revoking it or a duly executed Proxy bearing a later date to our Corporate Secretary or Assistant Corporate Secretary. A Proxy is also automatically revoked if the stockholder is present at the Annual Meeting and votes in person.

SolicitationSOLICITATION

This solicitation of Proxies is made by, and on behalf of, our Board. We will bear the entire cost of preparing, assembling, printing, mailing and otherwise making available Proxy materials furnished by the Board to stockholders. Copies of Proxy materials will be furnished to brokerage houses, fiduciaries and custodians to be forwarded to the beneficial owners of our Common Stock, as requested. In addition to the solicitation of Proxies by mail, some of our officers, directors and employees may (without additional compensation) solicit Proxies by telephone or personal interview, the costs of which we will bear.

Unless otherwise instructed, each valid returned Proxy that is not revoked will be voted:

 

“FOR” each of our nominees to the Board of Directors,

“FOR” approval of the amendment of the 1999 Employee Stock Purchase Plan,

“FOR” ratification of the appointment of KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for our fiscal year ending December 31, 2016,

“FOR” each of our nominees to the Board of Directors,

 

  “FOR” ratification of the appointment of KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for our fiscal year ending December 31, 2018,

“FOR” approval, on an advisory basis, of our executive compensation (“Say on Pay”), and

 

At the Proxy holders’ discretion on such other matters, if any, as may properly come before the Annual Meeting (including any proposal to adjourn the Annual Meeting).

At the Proxy holders’ discretion on such other matters, if any, as may properly come before the Meeting (including any proposal to adjourn the Meeting).DELIVERYOF PROXY MATERIALS

Delivery of Proxy Materials

In accordance with the rules adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC,”), commonly referred to as “Notice and Access,” we have decided to provide access to our Proxy materials over the internetInternet instead of mailing a printed copy of the materials to every stockholder. StockholdersWe believe this helps to promote more cost-effective and efficient delivery of our Proxy materials to stockholders while reducing our environmental impact. As a result, you will not receive printed copies of the Proxy materials unless theyyou request them. Instead, a Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials (the “Notice”) was mailed to stockholders of record (other than stockholders who previously requested electronic or paper delivery of proxy materials) on or about March 10, 2016.8, 2018. The Notice explains the process to access and review the information contained in the Proxy materials and how to vote their proxies over the internet.Internet. In addition, the Notice will provide you the option to instruct us to send our future Proxy materials to you electronically by email. All stockholders will have the ability toYou may also access the Proxy materials on athe website referred to in the Notice or request to receive a printed set of the Proxy materials.

 

6459

LOGO

MEETING & OTHER INFORMATION

Voting and Proxy Solicitation

LOGO     MEETING & OTHER INFORMATION


For those stockholders whoIf you will receive printed copies of the Proxy materials, upon request or otherwise, you may receive more than one set of materials, including multiple copies of this Proxy Statement and multiple Proxy cards or voting instruction cards. For example, if you hold your shares in more than one brokerage account, you may receive a separate voting instruction card for each brokerage account in which you hold shares. If you are a stockholder of record and your shares are registered in more than one name, you will receive more than one Proxy Card. Please follow the instructions on your Proxy Card(s) and vote accordingly.

How to Obtain a Separate Set of Proxy MaterialsHOWTO OBTAINA SEPARATE SETOF PROXY MATERIALS

Stockholders

You may request to receive Proxy materials in printed form by mail or electronically by email on an ongoing basis. Stockholders whoIf you sign up to receive Proxy materials electronically, you will receive an email with links to the materials, which may give them faster delivery of the materials and will help save printing and mailing costs and conserve natural resources.materials. If you choose to receive future Proxy materials by email, you will receive an email next year with instructions containing a link to those materials and a link to the proxy votingproxy-voting site. Your election to receive Proxy materials by email will remain in effect until you terminate it.

For those stockholders whoIf you share an address with another stockholder, you may receive only one set of Proxy materials (including our 2015 Annual Report onForm 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017, Proxy Statement or Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials, as applicable) unless you have provided contrary instructions. If you wish to receive a separate set of Proxy materials now or in the future, you may write or call us to request a separate copy of these materials from:

SVB Financial Group

3003 Tasman Drive

Santa Clara, California 95054

Attention: Kristi GilbaughCorporate Secretary

Telephone:(408) 654-7400

Facsimile: 408-969-6500(408)969-6500

Email: kgilbaugh@svb.combod@svb.com

Similarly, if you share an address with another stockholder and have received multiple copies of our Proxy materials, you may write or call us at the above address and phone number to request delivery of a single copy of these materials.

 

6560

LOGO

MEETING & OTHER INFORMATION

Voting and Proxy Solicitation

LOGO     MEETING & OTHER INFORMATION


STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS AND DIRECTOR NOMINATIONSStockholder Proposals and Director Nominations

STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS

You may submit proposals, including director nominations, for consideration at future stockholder meetings.

Stockholder Proposals

For a stockholder proposal to be considered for inclusion in our Proxy Statement for the annual meeting next year, the written proposal must be received by our Corporate Secretary at our principal executive offices no later than November 12, 2016.8, 2018. If the date of next year’s annual meeting is moved more than 30 days before or after the anniversary date of this year’s annual meeting, the deadline for inclusion of proposals in the Company’s Proxy Statement is instead a reasonable time before SVB Financial Group begins to print and mail its Proxy materials for the annual meeting next year. Such proposals will need to comply with the SEC regulations underRule 14a-8 regarding the inclusion of stockholder proposals in Company-sponsored proxy materials. Proposals should be addressed to:

Corporate Secretary

SVB Financial Group

3003 Tasman Drive

Santa Clara, California 95054

Facsimile: (408)969-6500

For a stockholder proposal that is not intended to be included in our Proxy Statement underRule 14a-8, the stockholder must deliver a Proxy Statement and form of Proxy to holders of a sufficient number of shares of our Common Stock to approve that proposal, provide the information required by our Bylaws and give timely notice to our Corporate Secretary in accordance with our Bylaws. In general, our Bylaws require that the notice be received by our Corporate Secretary:

 

Not earlier than the close of business on December 26, 2016,23, 2018, and

 

Not later than the close of business on January 25, 2017.22, 2019.

However, if the date of the stockholder meeting is moved more than 30 days before or 60 days after the first anniversary of our annual meeting for the prior year, then notice of a stockholder proposal that is not intended to be included in our Proxy Statement underRule 14a-8 must be received no earlier than the close of business 120 days prior to the meeting and no later than the close of business on the later of the following two dates:

 

90 days prior to the meeting, and

 

10 days after public announcement of the meeting date.

Nomination of Director CandidatesNOMINATIONOF DIRECTOR CANDIDATES

You may propose director candidates for consideration by the Board’s Governance Committee. Any such recommendations should include the nominee’s name and qualifications for Board membership and should be directed to our Corporate Secretary at the address of our principal executive offices set forth above. In addition, our Bylaws permit stockholders to nominate directors for election at an annual stockholder meeting. To nominate a director, the stockholder must deliver a Proxy Statement and form of Proxy to holders of a sufficient number of shares of our Common Stock to elect such nominee and provide the information required by our Bylaws, as well as a statement by the nominee acknowledging that he or she will owe a fiduciary obligation to us and its stockholders. In addition, the stockholder must give timely notice to our Corporate Secretary in accordance with our Bylaws, which, in general, require that the notice be received by our Corporate Secretary within the time period described above under “Stockholder Proposals.”

 

6661

LOGO

MEETING & OTHER INFORMATION

Stockholder Proposals and Nominations

LOGO     MEETING & OTHER INFORMATION


COPY OF BYLAW PROVISIONSCopy of Bylaw Provisions

You may contact our Corporate Secretary at our principal executive offices for a copy of the relevant Bylaw provisions regarding the requirements for making stockholder proposals and nominating director candidates. Our Bylaws also are available through the SEC’s website atwww.sec.gov.

2015 ANNUAL REPORT2017 Annual Report

Stockholders who wish to obtain copies of our Annual Report onForm 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015,2017, without charge, should address a written request to Kristi Gilbaugh,Attention: Corporate Secretary, SVB Financial Group, 3003 Tasman Drive, Santa Clara, California 95054 (Facsimile: (408)969-6500). The report is also available electronically atwww.svb.com/proxy.(The contents of the website are not incorporated herein by reference and the website address provided above and throughout this Proxy Statement is intended to be an inactive textual reference only.)

OTHER MATTERSOther Matters

The Board knows of no other matters to be presented for stockholder action at the Annual Meeting. However, if other matters do properly come before the Annual Meeting, the Board intends that the persons named in the proxies will vote upon such matters in accordance with their best judgment.

 

67

LOGO     MEETING & OTHER INFORMATION


APPENDIX A

SVB FINANCIAL GROUP

RECONCILIATIONOF GAAP

The following table provides a summary of non-GAAP core fee income, for the year ended December 31, 2015:

   2015 

Noninterest income

  

Non-GAAP core fee income (1):

  

Foreign exchange fees

  $87,007  

Credit card fees

   56,657  

Deposit service charges

   46,683  

Lending related fees (2)

   32,536  

Client investment fees

   21,610  

Letters of credit and standby letters of credit fees

   20,889  
  

 

 

 

Total non-GAAP core fee income

   265,382  
  

 

 

 

Gains on investment securities, net

   89,445  

Gains on derivative instruments, net

   83,805  

Other

   34,162  
  

 

 

 

GAAP noninterest income

  $  472,794  
  

 

 

 

62

(1)
LOGO

This non-GAAP measure represents noninterest income, but excludes certain line items where performance is typically subject to market or other conditions beyond our control.MEETING & OTHER INFORMATION

(2)

Lending related fees consists of fee income associated with credit commitments such as unused commitment fees, syndication feesBylaw Provisions and other loan processing fees.Annual Report

In discussing our financial performance, we use certain non-GAAP measures. These supplemental performance measures may vary from, and may not be comparable to, similarly titled measures by other companies in our industry. Non-GAAP financial measures are not in accordance with, or an alternative for, GAAP. Generally, a non-GAAP financial measure is a numerical measure of a company’s performance that either excludes or includes amounts that are not normally excluded or included in the most directly comparable measure calculated and presented in accordance with GAAP. A non-GAAP financial measure may also be a financial metric that is not required by GAAP or other applicable requirement.

Specifically in this Proxy Statement, we report our non-GAAP core fee income, which is a part of our noninterest income, as reported in accordance with GAAP. We believe this non-GAAP financial measure, when taken together with the corresponding GAAP financial measures (as applicable), provides meaningful supplemental information regarding our performance by excluding from our noninterest income certain line items where performance is typically subject to market or other conditions beyond our control, such as gains on investment securities and derivative instruments. We use, and believe our investors benefit from referring to, our non-GAAP core fee income in assessing our overall operating results, forecasting and analyzing future periods.


Non-GAAP financial measures should be considered in addition to, not as a substitute for or superior to, financial measures prepared in accordance with GAAP.LOGO

 

A-1

LOGO     APPENDICES


APPENDIX B

SVB FINANCIAL GROUP

1999 EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN

(As Amended Most Recently by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors as of February 9, 2016)

1.

PURPOSE.

(a) The purpose of this 1999 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “Plan”) is to provide a means by which employees of SVB Financial Group (formerly Silicon Valley Bancshares), a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), and its Affiliates, as defined in subparagraph 1(b), which are designated as provided in subparagraph 2(b), may be given an opportunity to purchase stock of the Company. This 1999 Employee Stock Purchase Plan is intended to replace the Silicon Valley Bancshares 1988 Employee Stock Purchase Plan.

(b) The word “Affiliate” as used in the Plan means any parent corporation or subsidiary corporation of the Company, as those terms are defined in Sections 424(e) and (f), respectively, of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”).

(c) The Company, by means of the Plan, seeks to retain the services of its employees, to secure and retain the services of new employees, and to provide incentives for such persons to exert maximum efforts for the success of the Company.

(d) The Company intends that the rights to purchase stock of the Company granted under the Plan be considered options issued under an “employee stock purchase plan” as that term is defined in Section 423(b) of the Code.

2.

ADMINISTRATION.

(a) The Plan shall be administered by the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of the Company unless and until the Board delegates administration to a Committee, as provided in subparagraph 2(c). Whether or not the Board has delegated administration, the Board shall have the final power to determine all questions of policy and expediency that may arise in the administration of the Plan.

(b) The Board shall have the power, subject to, and within the limitations of, the express provisions of the Plan:

(i) To determine when and how rights to purchase stock of the Company shall be granted and the provisions of each offering of such rights (which need not be identical).

(ii) To designate from time to time which Affiliates of the Company shall be eligible to participate in the Plan and any particular Offering.

(iii) To construe and interpret the Plan and rights granted under it, and to establish, amend and revoke rules and regulations for its administration. The Board, in the exercise of this power, may correct any defect, omission or inconsistency in the Plan, in a manner and to the extent it shall deem necessary or expedient to make the Plan fully effective.

(iv) To amend the Plan as provided in paragraph 13.

(v) Generally, to exercise such powers and to perform such acts as the Board deems necessary or expedient to promote the best interests of the Company and its Affiliates and to carry out the intent that the Plan be treated as an “employee stock purchase plan” within the meaning of Section 423 of the Code.

(c) The Board may delegate administration of the Plan to a Committee composed of one (1) or more members of the Board (the “Committee”). If administration is delegated to a Committee, the Committee shall have, in connection with the administration of the Plan, the powers theretofore possessed by the Board, subject, however, to such resolutions, not inconsistent with the provisions of the Plan, as may be adopted from time to time by the Board. The Board may abolish the Committee at any time and revest in the Board the administration of the Plan.

(d) Any interpretation of the Plan by the Board of any decision made by it under the Plan shall be final and binding on all persons.

B-1

LOGO     APPENDICES


3.

SHARES SUBJECT TO THE PLAN.

(a) Subject to the provisions of paragraph 12 relating to adjustments upon changes in stock, the stock that may be sold pursuant to rights granted under the Plan shall not exceed in the aggregate four million five hundred thousand (4,500,000) shares of the Company’s Common Stock (the “Common Stock”). If any right granted under the Plan shall for any reason terminate without having been exercised, the Common Stock not purchased under such right shall again become available for the Plan.

(b) The Common Stock subject to the Plan may be unissued shares or reacquired shares, bought on the market or otherwise.

4.

GRANT OF RIGHTS; OFFERING.

(a) The Board or the Committee may from time to time grant or provide for the grant of rights to purchase Common Stock of the Company under the Plan to eligible employees (an “Offering”) on a date or dates (the “Offering Date(s)”) selected by the Board or the Committee. Each Offering shall be in such form and shall contain such terms and conditions as the Board or the Committee shall deem appropriate, which shall comply with the requirements of Section 423(b)(5) of the Code that all employees granted rights to purchase stock pursuant to the Offering shall have the same rights and privileges. The terms and conditions of an Offering shall be incorporated by reference into the Plan and treated as part of the Plan. The provisions of separate Offerings need not be identical, but each Offering shall include (through incorporation of the provisions of this Plan by reference in the document comprising the Offering or otherwise) the period during which the Offering shall be effective, which period shall not exceed twenty-seven (27) months beginning with the Offering Date, and the substance of the provisions contained in paragraphs 5 through 8, inclusive.

(b) If an employee has more than one (1) right outstanding under the Plan, unless he or she otherwise indicates in agreements or notices delivered hereunder, a right with a lower exercise price (or an earlier-granted right if two (2) rights have identical exercise prices), will be exercised to the fullest possible extent before a right with a higher exercise price (or a later-granted right if two (2) rights have identical exercise prices) will be exercised.

5.

ELIGIBILITY.

(a) Rights may be granted only to employees of the Company or, as the Board or the Committee may designate as provided in subparagraph 2(b), to employees of any Affiliate of the Company. Except as provided in subparagraph 5(b), an employee of the Company or any Affiliate shall not be eligible to be granted rights under the Plan unless, on the Offering Date, such employee has been in the employ of the Company or any Affiliate for such continuous period preceding such grant as the Board or the Committee may require, but in no event shall the required period of continuous employment be greater than two (2) years. In addition, unless otherwise determined by the Board or the Committee and set forth in the terms of the applicable Offering, no employee of the Company or any Affiliate shall be eligible to be granted rights under the Plan unless, on the Offering Date, such employee’s customary employment with the Company or such Affiliate is for at least twenty (20) hours per week and at least five (5) months per calendar year.

(b) The Board or the Committee may provide that each person who, during the course of an Offering, first becomes an eligible employee of the Company or designated Affiliate will, on a date or dates specified in the Offering which coincides with the day on which such person becomes an eligible employee or occurs thereafter, receive a right under that Offering, which right shall thereafter be deemed to be a part of that Offering. Such right shall have the same characteristics as any rights originally granted under that Offering, as described herein, except that:

(i) the date on which such right is granted shall be the “Offering Date” of such right for all purposes, including determination of the exercise price of such right;

(ii) the period of the Offering with respect to such right shall begin on its Offering Date and end coincident with the end of such Offering; and

(iii) the Board or the Committee may provide that if such person first becomes an eligible employee within a specified period of time before the end of the Offering, he or she will not receive any right under that Offering.

(c) No employee shall be eligible for the grant of any rights under the Plan if, immediately after any such rights are granted, such employee owns stock possessing five percent (5%) or more of the total combined voting power or value of all classes of stock of the Company or of any Affiliate. For purposes of this subparagraph 5(c), the rules of Section 424(d) of the Code shall apply in determining the stock ownership of any employee, and stock which such employee may purchase under all outstanding rights and options shall be treated as stock owned by such employee.

B-2

LOGO     APPENDICES


(d) An eligible employee may be granted rights under the Plan only if such rights, together with any other rights granted under “employee stock purchase plans” of the Company and any Affiliates, as specified by Section 423(b)(8) of the Code, do not permit such employee’s rights to purchase stock of the Company or any Affiliate to accrue at a rate which exceeds twenty five thousand dollars ($25,000) of fair market value of such stock (determined at the time such rights are granted) for each calendar year in which such rights are outstanding at any time.

(e) Officers of the Company and any designated Affiliate shall be eligible to participate in Offerings under the Plan; provided, however, that the Board or the Committee may provide in an Offering that highly compensated employees within the meaning of Section 414(q) of the Code shall not be eligible to participate. In this respect, the Board or the Committee may exclude highly compensated employees with compensation above a certain level or who are officers or subject to the disclosure requirements of Section 16(a) of the Securities Act of 1934, as amended, provided the exclusion is applied with respect to each particular Offering in an identical manner to all highly compensated employees the Company and every Affiliate whose employees are participating in that Offering.

6.

RIGHTS; PURCHASE PRICE.

(a) On each Offering Date, each eligible employee, pursuant to an Offering made under the Plan, shall be granted the right to purchase up to the number of shares of Common Stock of the Company purchasable with a percentage designated by the Board or the Committee not exceeding fifteen percent (15%) of such employee’s Earnings (as defined in subparagraph 7(a)) during the period which begins on the Offering Date (or such later date as the Board or the Committee determines for a particular Offering) and ends on the date stated in the Offering, which date shall be no later than the end of the Offering. The Board or the Committee shall establish one (1) or more dates during an Offering (the “Purchase Date(s)”) on which rights granted under the Plan shall be exercised and purchases of Common Stock carried out in accordance with such Offering.

(b) In connection with each Offering made under the Plan, the Board or the Committee may specify a maximum number of shares that may be purchased by any employee as well as a maximum aggregate number of shares that may be purchased by all eligible employees pursuant to such Offering. Unless the Board or the Committee provide otherwise prior to the commencement of an Offering, no employee will be permitted to purchase more than 3,000 shares of Common Stock during an Offering. In addition, in connection with each Offering that contains more than one (1) Purchase Date, the Board or the Committee may specify a maximum aggregate number of shares which may be purchased by all eligible employees on any given Purchase Date under the Offering. If the aggregate purchase of shares upon exercise of rights granted under the Offering would exceed any such maximum aggregate number, the Board or the Committee shall make a pro rata allocation of the shares available in as nearly a uniform manner as shall be practicable and as it shall deem to be equitable.

(c) The purchase price of stock acquired pursuant to rights granted under the Plan shall be not less than the lesser of: (i) an amount equal to eighty-five percent (85%) of the fair market value of the stock on the Offering Date; or (ii) an amount equal to eighty-five percent (85%) of the fair market value of the stock on the Purchase Date.

7.

PARTICIPATION; WITHDRAWAL; TERMINATION.

(a) An eligible employee may become a participant in the Plan pursuant to an Offering by delivering an enrollment agreement to the Company within the time specified in the Offering, in such form as the Company provides. Each such agreement shall authorize payroll deductions of up to the maximum percentage specified by the Board or the Committee of such employee’s Earnings during the Offering. “Earnings” is defined as an employee’s regular salary or wages (including amounts thereof elected to be deferred by the employee, that would otherwise have been paid, under any arrangement established by the Company that is intended to comply with Section 125, Section 401(k), Section 402(e)(3), Section 402(h) or section 403(b) of the Code, and also including any deferrals under a non-qualified deferred compensation plan or arrangement established by the Company), and also, if determined by the Board or the Committee and set forth in the terms of the Offering, may include any or all of the following: (i) overtime pay, (ii) commissions, (iii) bonuses, incentive pay, profit sharing and other remuneration paid directly to the employee, and/or (iv) other items of remuneration not specifically excluded pursuant to the Plan. Earnings shall not include the cost of employee benefits paid for by the Company or an Affiliate, education or tuition reimbursements, imputed income arising under any group insurance or benefit program, traveling expenses, business and moving expense reimbursements, income received in connection with stock options or other equity awards, contributions made by the Company or an Affiliate under any employee benefit plan, and similar items of compensation, as determined by the Board or the Committee. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Board or Committee may modify the definition of “Earnings” with respect to one or more Offerings as the Board or Committee determines appropriate. The payroll deductions made for each participant shall be credited to an account for such participant under the Plan and shall be deposited with the general funds of the Company. A participant

B-3

LOGO     APPENDICES


may reduce (including to zero) or increase such payroll deductions, and an eligible employee may begin such payroll deductions, after the beginning of any Offering only as provided for in the Offering. A participant may make additional payments into his or her account only if specifically provided for in the Offering and only if the participant has not had the maximum amount withheld during the Offering.

(b) At any time during an Offering, a participant may terminate his or her payroll deductions under the Plan and withdraw from the Offering by delivering to the Company a notice of withdrawal in such form as the Company provides. Such withdrawal may be elected at any time prior to the end of the Offering except as provided by the Board or the Committee in the Offering. Upon such withdrawal from the Offering by a participant, the Company shall distribute to such participant all of his or her accumulated payroll deductions (reduced to the extent, if any, such deductions have been used to acquire stock for the participant) under the Offering, without interest, and such participant’s interest in that Offering shall be automatically terminated. A participant’s withdrawal from an Offering will have no effect upon such participant’s eligibility to participate in any other Offerings under the Plan but such participant will be required to deliver a new enrollment agreement in order to participate in subsequent Offerings under the Plan.

(c) Rights granted pursuant to any Offering under the Plan shall terminate immediately upon cessation of any participating employee’s employment with the Company and any designated Affiliate, for any reason, and the Company shall distribute to such terminated employee all of his or her accumulated payroll deductions (reduced to the extent, if any, such deductions have been used to acquire stock for the terminated employee), under the Offering, without interest.

(d) Rights granted under the Plan shall not be transferable by a participant other than by will or the laws of descent and distribution, or by a beneficiary designation as provided in paragraph 14, and during a participant’s lifetime, shall be exercisable only by such participant.

8.

EXERCISE.

(a) On each Purchase Date specified therefor in the relevant Offering, each participant’s accumulated payroll deductions and other additional payments specifically provided for in the Offering (without any increase for interest) will be applied to the purchase of whole shares of stock of the Company, up to the maximum number of shares permitted pursuant to the terms of the Plan and the applicable Offering, at the purchase price specified in the Offering. No fractional shares shall be issued upon the exercise of rights granted under the Plan. The amount, if any, of accumulated payroll deductions remaining in each participant’s account after the purchase of shares which is less than the amount required to purchase one share of Common Stock on the final Purchase Date of an Offering shall be held in each such participant’s account for the purchase of shares under the next Offering under the Plan, unless such participant withdraws from such next Offering, as provided in subparagraph 7(b), or is no longer eligible to be granted rights under the Plan, as provided in paragraph 5, in which case such amount shall be distributed to the participant after such final Purchase Date, without interest. The amount, if any, of accumulated payroll deductions remaining in any participant’s account after the purchase of shares which is equal to the amount required to purchase one or more whole shares of Common Stock on the final Purchase Date of an Offering shall be distributed in full to the participant after such Purchase Date, without interest.

(b) No rights granted under the Plan may be exercised to any extent unless the shares to be issued upon such exercise under the Plan (including rights granted thereunder) are covered by an effective registration statement pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”) and the Plan is in material compliance with all applicable state, foreign and other securities and other laws applicable to the Plan. If on a Purchase Date in any Offering hereunder the Plan is not so registered or in such compliance, no rights granted under the Plan or any Offering shall be exercised on such Purchase Date, and the Purchase Date shall be delayed until the Plan is subject to such an effective registration statement and such compliance, except that the Purchase Date shall not be delayed more than twelve (12) months and the Purchase Date shall in no event be more than twenty-seven (27) months from the Offering Date. If on the Purchase Date of any Offering hereunder, as delayed to the maximum extent permissible, the Plan is not registered and in such compliance, no rights granted under the Plan or any Offering shall be exercised and all payroll deductions accumulated during the Offering (reduced to the extent, if any, such deductions have been used to acquire stock) shall be distributed to the participants, without interest.

9.

COVENANTS OF THE COMPANY.

(a) During the terms of the rights granted under the Plan, the Company shall keep available at all times the number of shares of Common Stock required to satisfy such rights.

B-4

LOGO     APPENDICES


(b) The Company shall seek to obtain from each federal, state, foreign or other regulatory commission or agency having jurisdiction over the Plan such authority as may be required to issue and sell shares of stock upon exercise of the rights granted under the Plan. If, after reasonable efforts, the Company is unable to obtain from any such regulatory commission or agency the authority which counsel for the Company deems necessary for the lawful issuance and sale of stock under the Plan, the Company shall be relieved from any liability for failure to issue and sell stock upon exercise of such rights unless and until such authority is obtained.

10.

USE OF PROCEEDS FROM STOCK.

Proceeds from the sale of stock pursuant to rights granted under the Plan shall constitute general funds of the Company.

11.

RIGHTS AS A STOCKHOLDER.

A participant shall not be deemed to be the holder of, or to have any of the rights of a holder with respect to, any shares subject to rights granted under the Plan unless and until the participant’s shareholdings acquired upon exercise of rights under the Plan are recorded in the books of the Company (or its transfer agent).

12.

ADJUSTMENTS UPON CHANGES IN STOCK.

(a) If any change is made in the stock subject to the Plan, or subject to any rights granted under the Plan (through merger, consolidation, reorganization, recapitalization, stock dividend, dividend in property other than cash, stock split, liquidating dividend, combination of shares, exchange of shares, change in corporate structure or other transaction not involving the receipt of consideration by the Company), the Plan and outstanding rights will be appropriately adjusted in the class(es) and maximum number of shares subject to the Plan and the class(es) and number of shares and price per share of stock subject to outstanding rights. Such adjustments shall be made by the Board or the Committee, the determination of which shall be final, binding and conclusive. (The conversion of any convertible securities of the Company shall not be treated as a “transaction not involving the receipt of consideration by the Company.”)

(b) In the event of: (1) a dissolution or liquidation of the Company; (2) a sale of all or substantially all of the assets of the Company; (3) a merger or consolidation in which the Company is not the surviving corporation; (4) a reverse merger in which the Company is the surviving corporation but the shares of the Company’s Common Stock outstanding immediately preceding the merger are converted by virtue of the merger into other property, whether in the form of securities, cash or otherwise; (5) the acquisition by any person, entity or group within the meaning of Section 13(d) or 14(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), or any comparable successor provisions (excluding any employee benefit plan, or related trust, sponsored or maintained by the Company or any Affiliate of the Company) of the beneficial ownership (within the meaning of Rule 13d-3 promulgated under the Exchange Act, or comparable successor rule) of securities of the Company representing at least fifty percent (50%) of the combined voting power entitled to vote in the election of directors; or (6) the individuals who, as of the date of the adoption of this Plan, are members of the Board (the “Incumbent Board”; (if the election, or nomination for election by the Company’s stockholders, of a new director was approved by a vote of at least fifty percent (50%) of the members of the Board then comprising the Incumbent Board, such new director shall upon his or her election be considered a member of the Incumbent Board) cease for any reason to constitute at least fifty percent (50%) of the Board; then the Board in its sole discretion may take any action or arrange for the taking of any action among the following: (i) any surviving or acquiring corporation may assume outstanding rights or substitute similar rights for those under the Plan, (ii) such rights may continue in full force and effect, or (iii) all participants’ accumulated payroll deductions may be used to purchase Common Stock immediately prior to or within a reasonable period of time following the transaction described above and the participants’ rights under the ongoing Offering terminated.

13.

AMENDMENT OF THE PLAN OR OFFERINGS.

(a) The Board at any time, and from time to time, may amend the Plan or the terms of one or more Offerings. However, except as provided in paragraph 12 relating to adjustments upon changes in stock, no amendment shall be effective unless approved by the stockholders of the Company within twelve (12) months before or after the adoption of the amendment, where the amendment will:

(i) Increase the number of shares reserved for rights under the Plan;

(ii) Modify the provisions as to eligibility for participation in the Plan or an Offering (to the extent such modification requires stockholder approval in order for the Plan to obtain employee stock purchase plan treatment under Section 423 of the Code or to comply with the requirements of Rule 16b-3 promulgated under the Exchange Act, or any comparable successor rule (“Rule 16b-3”); or

B-5

LOGO     APPENDICES


(iii) Modify the Plan or an Offering in any other way if such modification requires stockholder approval in order for the Plan to obtain employee stock purchase plan treatment under Section 423 of the Code or to comply with the requirements of Rule 16b-3.

It is expressly contemplated that the Board or the Committee may amend the Plan or an Offering in any respect the Board or the Committee deems necessary or advisable to provide eligible employees with the maximum benefits provided or to be provided under the provisions of the Code and the regulations promulgated thereunder relating to employee stock purchase plans and/or to bring the Plan and/or rights granted under an Offering into compliance therewith.

(b) The Board may, in its sole discretion, submit any amendment to the Plan or an Offering for stockholder approval.

(c) Rights and obligations under any rights granted before amendment of the Plan or Offering shall not be impaired by any amendment of the Plan, except with the consent of the person to whom such rights were granted, or except as necessary to comply with any laws or governmental regulations, or except as necessary to ensure that the Plan and/or rights granted under an Offering comply with the requirements of Section 423 of the Code.

14.

DESIGNATION OF BENEFICIARY.

(a) A participant may file a written designation of a beneficiary who is to receive any shares and cash, if applicable, from the participant’s account under the Plan in the event of such participant’s death subsequent to the end of an Offering but prior to delivery to the participant of such shares and cash. In addition, a participant may file a written designation of a beneficiary who is to receive any cash from the participant’s account under the Plan in the event of such participant’s death during an Offering.

(b) Such designation of beneficiary may be changed by the participant at any time by written notice in the form prescribed by the Company. In the event of the death of a participant and in the absence of a beneficiary validly designated under the Plan who is living (or if an entity, is otherwise in existence) at the time of such participant’s death, the Company shall deliver such shares and/or cash to the executor or administrator of the estate of the participant, or if no such executor or administrator has been appointed (to the knowledge of the Company), the Company, in its sole discretion, may deliver such shares and/or cash to the spouse or to any one (1) or more dependents or relatives of the participant, or if no spouse, dependent or relative is known to the Company, then to such other person as the Company may determine.

15.

TERMINATION OR SUSPENSION OF THE PLAN.

(a) The Board or the Committee in its discretion may suspend or terminate the Plan at any time. The Plan shall automatically terminate if all the shares subject to the Plan pursuant to subparagraph 3(a) are issued. No rights may be granted under the Plan while the Plan is suspended or after it is terminated.

(b) Rights and obligations under any rights granted while the Plan is in effect shall not be impaired by suspension or termination of the Plan, except as expressly provided in the Plan or with the consent of the person to whom such rights were granted, or except as necessary to comply with any laws or governmental regulation, or except as necessary to ensure that the Plan and/or rights granted under an Offering comply with the requirements of Section 423 of the Code.

16.

EFFECTIVE DATE OF PLAN.

The Plan shall become effective on the same day on which the Company’s shareholders approve the Plan pursuant to vote of the shareholders held at the duly noticed Annual Shareholders Meeting in 1999.

17.

CHOICE OF LAW.

All questions concerning the construction, validity and interpretation of this Plan shall be governed by the law of the State of California, without regard to such state’s conflict of laws rules.

*    *    *    *

B-6

LOGO     APPENDICES


LOGO

SVB FINANCIAL GROUP 3003 TASMAN DRIVE SANTA CLARA, CA 95054 VOTE BY INTERNET—INTERNET - www.proxyvote.com Use the Internet to transmit your voting instructions and for electronic delivery of information up until 11:59 p.m.P.M. Eastern Time the day before the cut-off date or meeting date. Have your proxy card in hand when you access the web site and follow the instructions to obtain your records and to create an electronic voting instruction form. ELECTRONIC DELIVERY OF FUTURE PROXY MATERIALS If you would like to reduce the costs incurred by our company in mailing proxy materials, you can consent to receiving all future proxy statements, proxy cards and annual reports electronically via e-mail or the Internet. To sign up for electronic delivery, please follow the instructions above to vote using the Internet and, when prompted, indicate that you agree to receive or access proxy materials electronically in future years. VOTE BY PHONE—PHONE - 1-800-690-6903 Use any touch-tone telephone to transmit your voting instructions up until 11:59 p.m.P.M. Eastern Time the day before the cut-off date or meeting date. Have your proxy card in hand when you call and then follow the instructions. VOTE BY MAIL Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope we have provided or return it to Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717. TO VOTE, MARK BLOCKS BELOW IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS FOLLOWS: E01547-P71472E35818-P01245 KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS THIS PROXY CARD IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED AND DATED. DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION ONLY SVB FINANCIAL GROUP For Withhold For All To withhold authority to vote for any individual The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR the following: All All Except nominee(s), mark “For All Except” and write the number(s) of the nominee(s) on the line below. 1. Election of Directors Nominees: 01) Greg W. Becker 02) Eric A. Benhamou 03) David M. ClapperJohn S. Clendening 04) Roger F. Dunbar 05) Joel P. Friedman 06) Lata KrishnanKimberly A. Jabal 07) Jeffrey N. Maggioncalda 08) Mary J. Miller 09) Kate D. Mitchell 10) John F. Robinson 11) Garen K. Staglin For All Withhold All Except For All To withhold authority to vote for any individual nominee(s), mark “For All Except” and write the number(s) of the nominee(s) on the line below. The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR the following proposals:Proposals 2 and 3: For Against Abstain 2. To approve an amendment to our 1999 Employee Stock Purchase Plan to reserve an additional 1,500,000 shares for issuance thereunder. 3. To ratify the appointment of KPMG LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for its fiscal year ending December 31, 2016. 4.2018. 3. To approve, on an advisory basis, our executive compensation. For Against Abstaincompensation (“Say on Pay”). To cumulate votes as to a particular nominee as explained in the Proxy Statement, check box to the right then indicate the name(s) and the number of votes to be given to such nominee(s) on the reverse side of this card. Please do not check box unless you want to exercise cumulative voting. Please indicate if you plan to attend this meeting. Yes No Please sign exactly as your name(s) appear(s) hereon. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, or other fiduciary, please give full title as such. Joint owners should each sign personally. All holders must sign. If a corporation or partnership, please sign in full corporate or partnership name by authorized officer. Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX] Date Signature (Joint Owners) Date


LOGOLOGO

 

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting: The Notice and Proxy Statement Annual Letter to Stockholders from the Chief Executive Officer and Board Chairman, and 20152017 Form 10-K Annual Report are available at www.proxyvote.com. E01548-P71472E35819-P01245 SVB FINANCIAL GROUP THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS FOR USE AT THE ANNUAL MEETING ON APRIL 21, 201626, 2018 The undersigned appoints GREG W. BECKER and MICHAEL S. ZUCKERT, or either of them, with full power of substitution for himself, as the proxy holder of the undersigned to vote and otherwise represent all of the shares registered in the name of the undersigned at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of SVB Financial Group to be held on Thursday, April 21, 2016,26, 2018, at 4:30 p.m. local time,Local Time, at the Company’s offices located at 3005 Tasman Drive, Santa Clara, California 95054 and any postponements or adjournments thereof, with the same effect as if the undersigned were present and voting such shares, on the matters and manner listed on the reverse side. If the undersigned holds shares in its name, and signs and returns this proxy card without giving specific voting instructions, the undersigned’s shares will be voted as recommended by the Company’s Board on each of the matters listed on the reverse side and as the proxy holders may determine in their discretion with respect to any other matters that properly come before the meeting. Cumulative voting (Complete only if applicable) NAME OF CANDIDATE # OF VOTES CAST 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.8 1.9 1.10 1.11 # OF VOTES CAST (If you exercised cumulative voting, please mark corresponding box on the reverse side.) Continued and to be signed on reverse side


LOGO

svb

Financial Group

SVB 2015 | Letter to stockholders and partners


LOGO

Year in review: 2015 Letter to stockholders and partners

To our stockholders and partners,

2015 was a strong year for SVB Financial Group, thanks to our dynamic client base and our effective execution. We delivered outstanding financial results, fueled growth across the business, expanded our client base and strengthened our market leadership. Our ongoing commitment to the innovation economy is the foundation of this success. Serving our clients and focusing on solid execution allowed us to outperform expectations while building momentum for long-term growth. In the face of low interest rates and intense competition, SVB delivered industry-leading growth and profitability, growing earnings per share by 25 percent and average assets by 24 percent.

Strong market position

We grew our net client count by 18 percent, and this strong client acquisition fueled our success. We continued to add early-stage clients at a rapid pace and made steady gains among fast-growing midsize firms and global enterprises. We also focused on growing our relationships with existing clients by adding value and winning their loyalty throughout their life cycles. Many of our current later-stage clients came to us as startups. Another area of focus was our relationships with innovation economy investors, particularly private equity firms. Those relationships drove approximately 50 percent of average loan growth in 2015 and contributed to strong fee income growth as well. Finally, our Private Bank and Wealth Advisory practices gained meaningful

corporates, and mainstream institutional fund managers. Many of these high-growth companies have been disrupting entire industries and delivering impressive customer and revenue traction. Although M&A and IPOs among venture- backed companies slowed compared with last year’s blockbuster pace and dollars, our clients continued to see relatively healthy activity, which contributed to strong venture capital-related gains for SVB.

Enhancing our business

In 2015, we continued to enhance our business in order to help our clients succeed. We improved and expanded our

FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS

24%

25%

$344 M

$ 6.62

$1.0B

NET INCOME

EARNINGS PER SHARE

NET INTEREST INCOME

$ 40.8B

$14.8B

$ 75.5B

2014

2015

2014

2015

AVERAGE TOTAL ASSETS

AVERAGE LOAN BALANCES

AVERAGE TOTAL CLIENT FUNDS1

AVERAGE ASSETS

EARNINGS

(PER SHARE)

momentum throughout the year, as we increased the number of Private Bank households we serve by 25 percent and nearly tripled our Wealth Management client count.

Healthy client markets

Our clients performed well in 2015. New company formation, fundraising and investment remained strong. High-growth companies saw capital infusions from a wide array of investors, including venture capital and private equity firms, large

digital delivery, expanding adoption of mobile banking among our clients by over 50 percent, and our SVB Mobile Banking app was recognized as one of the best in the industry.2 Most of our new client accounts were opened through our Digital Client Onboarding platform. We furthered our commitment to embracing and supporting our fintech clients and their technology, hiring a team from banking API (application programming interface) startup, Standard Treasury, to help expand our digital banking platform. We continued to grow

2


LOGO

Year in review: 2015 Letter to stockholders and partners

our global presence and capabilities, which contributed to client, balance sheet and revenue growth across the board. We also marked a significant milestone in China, with our joint venture bank receiving its local currency license, which will significantly enhance our long-term opportunities there.

Core fee income was 18% of total revenues in 2015

We accomplished all of this by staying true to what we do best: leveraging our platform, expertise and unique role in the global innovation economy to deliver the innovative financial services, unparalleled insight and meaningful connections that increase our clients’ likelihood of success.

FEE AND INVESTMENT INCOME

$265M

$89M

$71M

CORE FEE INCOME3

GAINS ON INVESTMENT

GAINS ON EQUITY

SECURITIES4

WARRANTS

Giving back to our communities

SVB has always believed in giving back to our communities, and in 2015, SVB and our employees raised or donated more than $2.5 million to benefit charitable and community organizations worldwide. These causes ranged from community partnerships that help disadvantaged people to nonprofits focused on entrepreneurial development and inclusion of people with disabilities.

In one of our largest fundraising efforts in 2015, hundreds of SVB employees raised $646,000 for Best Buddies International, which provides employment and leadership opportunities for individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities. SVB employees in San Francisco, Boston and New York volunteered their time and expertise to support BUILD, a social venture that helps low-income youth access the business and intellectual resources of their communities through education and entrepreneurship. In addition, our own SVB Foundation awarded approximately $200,000 in grants to community organizations for which our employees volunteer. On top of these corporatewide activities, SVB employees around the world selflessly donated their time, goods and services to nonprofit organizations serving their communities.

A YEAR OF GROWTH

28%

17%

Average loan growth

Net interest income growth

29%

27%

Average total client funds growth

Core fee income growth

33%

37%

International client count growth

Average Private Bank loan growth

GIVING BACK

$2.5M

In 2015, SVB and its employees raised and donated more than

$2.5 million to charitable and community organizations worldwide.

A LOOK AT SVB IN 2015

China JV bank receives RMB license

SVB named Financial Firm of the Year by Global Corporate Venturing

Standard Treasury team joins SVB to expand digital banking APIs

SVB appoints new chief information officer

Net interest income reaches $1.0B

SVB reaches $40B in total assets

SVB Asset Management exceeds $20B in balances

SVB Mobile Banking chosen as a top mobile app by American Banker2

SVB appoints chief digital officer and new chief operations officer

3


LOGO

Year in review: 2015 Letter to our stockholders and partners

Outlook for 2016

As we move into 2016, we are focused on four overarching priorities:

Enhancing our strong brand and reputation through our digital platform and differentiated products, services, insights and networks

Investing in the talent and infrastructure to drive and support our long-term growth Maintaining strong risk management, with an emphasis on stable credit and enhancements to support our growth

Investing in people and communities

We are optimistic about the future. While uncertainty about the global economic outlook persists, and the pace and magnitude of future short-term rate increases are unclear, we believe in the power of innovation and the dynamic nature of our clients. We believe they will continue to outperform the broader economy over the long term, as they have done for many years. When our clients succeed, we succeed, and we will continue to serve them by adding value to their businesses, delivering on our promises and earning their loyalty every day.

Our motivated, talented employees make this possible. Their enterprising spirit, deep industry knowledge and passion for best-in-class service are the real-life embodiment of our reputation as a dedicated, insightful partner to our clients around the world.

Together, we remain committed to driving value for our stockholders by delivering on that reputation and further solidifying our position as the bank of the global innovation economy.

Sincerely,

Roger F. Dunbar

Chairman of the Board of Directors

Greg Becker

President and CEO

1. Total client funds consists of on-balance-sheet deposits and off-balance-sheet client investment funds.

2. “Top 6 Mobile Banking Apps for Business,” American Banker, September 22, 2015.

3. For the year ended December 31, 2015, we had total non-interest income of $472.8 million, which included $265.4 million of non-GAAP core fee income. This non-GAAP measure represents non-interest income but excludes certain line items where performance is typically subject to market or other conditions beyond our control.

Core fee income comprises foreign exchange fees, credit card fees, deposit service charges, lending-related fees, letter of credit fees and client investment fees.

4. For the year ended December 31, 2015, we had net gains on investment securities of $89.4 million with $32.1 million of net gains attributable to noncontrolling interests, including carried interests, resulting in non-GAAP net gains on investment securities, net of non-controlling interests, of $57.3 million.

Learn more at svb.com

CORPORATE HEADQUARTERS

3003 Tasman Drive, Santa Clara, CA 95054 U.S.A., Phone 408.654.7400

This letter contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of applicable federal securities laws. Such statements are predictions, and actual results may differ materially. Information about factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from our forward-looking statements is provided in our 2015 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

©2016 SVB Financial Group. All rights reserved. Member of FDIC and Federal Reserve System. SVB>, SVB Financial Group, and Silicon Valley Bank are registered trademarks.

02-24-16

®

FSC

www.fsc.org

MIX

Paper from responsible sources

FSC® C101537